This thread reminds me of a question posed years ago - probably because of
the staying power of the chestnut dances like Chorus Jig, Rory O'More,
Petronella, etc. - WHICH CONTRA DANCES DO YOU THINK FOLKS WILL STILL BE
DANCING 100 YEARS FROM NOW?
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Bree Kalb <bree(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
  Alan,
 Your explanation is so reflective of my reasons and so vivid, I felt like
 I was dancing with you. If we're ever in the same hall and that dance is on
 the program.....
 Bree Kalb
 -----
 Why I like it:
 Whether I'm inactive or active, I like the music, I really like the way
 the parts of the dance interlock, I like the many things that remind me
 I'm dancing in a bigger set
 than just my foursome - go down the outside and you have to see the
 whole line, be in line, match their timing; go down the middle and it's
 the same, but if I'm inactive
 I have to see people outside of my foursome on the way through.  I
 really like how much it requires timing and rewards timing and
 geographical sense.  I rather like the feeling of being a good cog in
 the big dance machine.  I like supporting the actives and being
 supported when it's my turn.
 - When I'm an active, the way the excitement of the tune builds up
 during the contra corners to resolve at the balance with partner (and
 the balance + swing is way
   better than the balance without swing)  is just unparalleled. Hitting
 the balance on the dot is just a tremendous moment.  The whole dance
 (which is, incidentally, made of
   standard early-nineteenth century figures which show up in other
 dances but aren't as  satisfying there) is an exercise in delayed
 gratification; I leave my partner, we're apart
   (but have a flirtatious peek, perhaps, in the middle of the
 down-the-outside-and-back), we're closer together for the
 down-the-middle-and-back; we connect with our
   same-sex neighbors on the cast off, we interact with two opposite-sex
 neighbors in the contra-corners, briefly seeing partner in between
 others, and we finally connect.
   It's awesome.
 - When I'm inactive - well, you can always swing your partner during the
 down-the-outside, and I have no problem for that. During the
 down-the-middle  you can likely cheat-swing somebody from the   next
 line (although I won't generally do that and don't much like it when my
 partner abandons me to cheat swing).  But here's what I like there - I
 enjoy being able to support the actives in the contra corners, I enjoy
 getting a read on whether they want to push off and spin out of the
 allemande and supporting that, I enjoy helping to get them to their
 appointment with their partner on time.   (I'll usually balance or stomp
 at the end of the contra corners even if I'm an inactive.)  I'll admit
 that I'd be a bit frustrated if I were inactive all the way to to the
 top and the dance ended without my ever getting to be active, but I'm
 happy to have it run long enough for everybody to get to be both active
 and inactive.
 Your mileage may well vary.  People like different things.
 -- Alan
 ______________________________**_________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…
 ______________________________**_________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…
 
-- 
*Looking forward,
Linda S. Mrosko
7302 CR 2829
Mabank, Texas 75156
(903) 451-5535 (H)
(903) 288-4401 (cell)
(903) 603-9033 (Skype)
www.towerwebsites.com/dancinglinda
*"We should consider every day lost on which we have not danced at least
once."
                                  -- Friedrich Nietzsche