Kat,
Nice observations.
I'll note that your symmetrical version of California Twirl into "Tug and
Turn" is almost exactly the definition of "Trade By" in club squares for
dancers who are facing out of the set. (For dancers facing in, trade by is
functionally the same as "pass through."
I like your tweaks toward symmetry, particularly as you're in a position
to encourage it across an entire community.
I fear a splitting of dance communities as some dancers favor certain
terms while others prefer a different set without some consensus.
Jerome Grisanti
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023, 12:23 PM Katherine Kitching via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Hello from Halifax, NS, Canada!
I'd like to add to this convo by saying that for many years (as both a
dancer and then a caller), I've had the desire to cultivate the roles as
equal, rather than the Larks having more of a leader role.
I wasn't sure that that was an ok thing to want though, so I kept it to
myself at first. I'm thrilled to now read that there are others also
consciously pushing the roles in that direction.
Our group was doing gents and ladies when i started to dance, and there
were definitely many gents in our group who wanted to lead me around. I
didn't particularly enjoy being relegated to the follow role because of my
gender. (and yes, there was in theory the option to dance the other role,
but as I was easily confused back then, I preferred to stick with the role
I was slowly getting used to). At the same time, as I started to learn
more, I noticed there were many "gents" who had no sense of leading, and I
began to enjoy as the "lady" being able to "back-lead" them to help
them
feel the wonderful centripetal and balancy forces at play. I became quite
the expert back-leader in the ladies chain! But I always hated the term
"back-lead" as I felt it had a negative connotation. (That pushy lady is
back-leading the gent, just like a back-seat driver!). I even remember
once, an experienced dancer from the US telling me it was totally
inappropriate to desire to "back-lead" and I still feel annoyed by that
today ;)
Anyhow, we've now switched over to a non-gendered dance with Larks and
Ravens (with beautiful bird-labels that the dancers wear, which is why we
haven't evolved to Robins here) and it is working wonderfully for us.
With so many new dancers coming in and old ones fading away over the
years, I think the majority of our dancers don't have any idea there even
*were* gender roles in our type of dancing. (We are quite an isolated
community out here, so for many people, we are the only thing they know
about contra dancing). I think that is so cool! When you look around the
room at our dances, we have reached the point where there is no correlation
between visible gender and bird-role - everyone randomly assigns
themselves. For us, it's been an amazing change - and we've heard directly
from both the queer community and from many women that they feel more
comfortable at our dances now. And the cisgender men keep coming so I
presume they are having an ok time too :)
As I've become more confident in my calling and am now the defacto
caller for our group (nobody else is currently available though I'm going
to train some new folks this spring), I've felt more bold to cultivate the
roles as I'd like to see them.
I never mention a notion of leading or following, and instead I talk
about the delightful "push-me-pull-you" feeling of contra, where each
dancer feels an "elastic connection" to the other, and how (in my view)
this special shared connection, along with a feeling of never-ending
movement, is what makes contra magical.
We get a very large proportion of beginners each month, and also many
repeat dancers who don't become particularly skilled (they perhaps attend
once every 2-3 months on average, so their learning curve is slow, and they
forget a lot after our 3-month summer break).
As such, we do a lot of dances without swings (I try to get at least
halfway through the dance without introducing a swing), and I'm trying
Larks chains as well as Robins chains prior to swinging these days.
Post-covid, we've been doing swings with a modified ballroom hold (Larks
left hand in Robins' right, but other hands cupped on each others' elbows),
which creates more space between the dancers -- both for personal comfort
for any gender when dancing with a stranger--and also less germs-in-face
feeling during these covid times.
(Though I plan to try the Scottish Swing that Ridge suggested at our
next dance, just out of interest! :) )
I find the swing in this modified ballroom position feels symmetrical to
me and to our dancers- both dancers are supporting each other by the elbow,
and one does not feel more inherently "lead-y".
I've also replaced "California Twirl" with what I call "tug and
turn" -
I tell the dancers to tug off the hand they are holding (i.e inside hand)
to pass by the right shoulder - then catch by the new inside hand facing
the other way. When this happens with partners, sometimes they end up
doing a cali-twirl as an embellishment - but the base move is symmetrical.
So I feel I'm close to achieving my personal vision for a no
leads/follow dance. :D
I have always loved contra as a way for two dancers or 4 dancers or a
whole line of dancers to feel these interesting connections and forces at
play, while never stopping moving. I personally have never been interested
in contra as something that resembles "couples dancing", so the approach we
have in our group is emphasizing the elements of contra that I
personally love best. As our dances are well attended and growing, it
seems to be working for our group. Which is gratifying for me for sure :)
All that said!
One of the most interesting parts of this discussion is to read about
all the diverse approaches that callers are taking throughout the world,
and how different approaches seem to work super well in different
communities. I am totally intrigued by positional calling. I don't forsee
trying it myself any time soon, only because what we have going for us
right now is working really well and it's taken many years to get here...
but I'm super keen to try it out at a dance elsewhere, and maybe in the
future I'll give it a try in Halifax.
And while I LOVE our non-gendered dances here in Halifax, I could see
myself as a cisgender person getting a kick out of going to a dance
somewhere far away with my sweetheart on a date night, where they call with
men and ladies and the gender roles are quite rigid, and getting into that
vibe for the evening. And though I am personally terrified of the idea of
dancing at one of those fusion events where the contra dancers do some
red-hot swing/blues type dancing with their partners, I *adore* watching
videos of it, it's amazing!
So I wanted to say that I hope everyone continues to contribute to this
discussion in the spirit of "Here is what works for me/ here is what works
for my group in case it interests you" rather than in a critical or
prosthelytizing fashion :)
Cheers from Halifax!
Kat Kitching
https://halifaxcontra.ca <http://www.halifaxcontra.c>
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list --
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net