13 May
2010
13 May
'10
2:03 p.m.
Gee, I guess you would need 6 couples to get to everyone. Thanks, Luke, for broadening my
perspective.
Ron
From: luke.donev(a)gmail.com
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:48:16 -0500
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] Dance length
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:…
Actually, no. Most Becketts progress in a
clockwise direction. Everyone has equal
opportunity to dance with each of the other couples.
Double progression dances, becket (either direction) or improper, only
let you dance with half the couples when there's an even number of
couples. For four couple they're nice in that they keep everyone in,
but you don't get to dance with everyone.
For a clockwise double progression becket, same letters are partners. It goes
B a
b A
~~
D c
d C
Progress
D b
d B
~~
C a
c A
Progress
C d
c D
~~
A b
a B
Progress
A c
a C
~~
B d
b D
Progress
B a
b A
~~
D c
d C
And you're back where you started, with A's never dancing with D's
(for a ccw becket, read bottom to top)
--
Luke Donev
http://www.lukedonev.com
Luke.Donev(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers