Thanks for the answers, Alan.
Alan wrote "If you play it like a contra dance tune, you won't get an
English dance out of it."
Ah - but I don't want an "English dance" - I just want a dance that is
fun :-) so I would ask the band to funk it up or play any tune they
like.
And I have no objection to adding twirls in "English" dosidos.
I really don't believe that the 17th and 18th century dancers were as
staid as some people would have us believe.
I have studied the history of many dance forms and constantly see
improvisation and innovation - these are all living traditions.
I also don't believe that the dances were done only to specific tunes,
except for the ones that have a really strong connection to the dance or
are strange lengths.
Too many elements get fossilized by people who think that it should only
be done the way they learnt it 50 years ago.
Your "Trash English" (or xEnglish - eXtreme English - as some people
are trying to re-brand it) sounds great - some of us have been doing it
for decades!
Shame that we need to pigeon-hole dances - it is much more fun just to
do everything :-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Hi Greg,
Your definition: "open public dances, with live music and a
caller, that are sponsored and hosted by a group of dance enthusiasts"
is basically any dance community - specifically contra in your case
since you added "primarily featuring duple contras".
As to how many new dancers turn up at such contra dances in
the UK? Well, there are less than 10 active contra dance clubs in the
UK as far as I know - they are listed at
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk/Links.html, and some are quite small. So
it is difficult to provide any sensible statistics based on such a small
sample.
There are a few big successful ones like the monthly London
Barndance Company dance in Cecil Sharp House (never billed as a contra,
and not guaranteed to be, but generally at least 90% contra dancing to
great contra dance bands and with great contra dance callers). Usually
around 80 to 150 dancers I believe, peaking to 300 for special events.
Most attendees are regulars; I suspect the number of new dancers is well
under 10%, but sometimes boosted by a party (literally - someone brings
their birthday party guests along for a dance) - however the party
members very rarely ever come back for another dance.
There are of course countless community dances (One Night
Stands - weddings, birthdays, fund-raisers, etc.) but in my experience
it is very rare to get one of those attendees to come to a dance
community event.
There is a Modern Western Square Dance community with around
150 clubs - see http://www.uksquaredancing.com/page5.htm. I don't know
how they do, but in the southeast (where I live) it has virtually died
out.
There is a Ceilidh community, who dance relatively simple
dances with lots of energy and stepping (hornpipe step-hops, rants, skip
steps, skip-change/polka steps, etc.) to great bands who are
experimenting with lots of musical influences (a similar evolution to
the contra dance music one, but exploring different musical genres) -
lots of information at http://www.cix.co.uk/~net-services/ec/ and
http://www.webfeet.org/ - there are usually around 10 big ceilidhs
around the country each weekend. Sadly none in my area, so I have no
idea how they are doing at getting new dancers. There are also lots of
ceilidhs at all the big folk festivals with lots of attendees. This is
the dance community that attracts the most younger people in the UK.
There are no ECD clubs in the UK (well there might be one
that calls itself that) - but lots of Folk Dance Clubs and other groups
which have a lot of similarity, but who are normally prepared to try any
dance. Sadly the average age is quite high at many of these clubs and
so the dances chosen, and the style in which they are danced, reflect
the physical ability of the dancers. They will happily dance contra
dances, but generally without the twirls and spins that Americans add.
Many of the clubs are quite small, but as you can see at
http://www.setandturnsingle.org.uk/ there are hundreds of them, and lots
of open dances at the weekends and at festivals. Sadly, the percentage
of new dancers is, I believe, very small.
Again, the word "club" above is not intended to imply a
closed group - just a regular event open to anyone, but attended
primarily by regulars.
So, sorry, no specific answers, but I hope that helps a
little.
Note: this is my personal perception of what is happening in
the UK - if anyone can add to it please do.
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Hi Greg,
Sorry, I used the word "club" in a very generic way - I
meant any form of regular gathering, series, dance or session where
contra dances are danced.
My note was a response to your words: "The term "contra
dance" as an event name seems pretty clear."
Your response seems to agree with my understanding, i.e.
that the term is not well defined and is used by anyone running a dance
to mean what they want it to mean, just like the terms "barn dance",
"ceilidh" and even "square dance" are used over here. We often get
people asking us to run a square dance when they want simple dances in
any formation, and never notice if I don't call a square all night!
And, strangely, they often dress up as cowboys and cowgirls even though
we are doing English dances to English tunes. Ah, the power of the
media!
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:05:16 PDT
> From: "Brian Hamshar" <bhamshar(a)yahoo.com>
> To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Firedancing/ Hooping while calling and other
> possible future Burning Man innovations
> Message-ID: <761638.47077.qm(a)smtp105-mob.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I was just thinking the same thing...we could integrate lighting signals into "techno" contras to help reinforce the dance phrasing as an alternative or adjunct to the extensive vocal cueing that is often called for with this music. I'm looking forward to exploring this idea.
>
> Brian Hamshar
Note this discussion about calling with lights started by Jeff Kaufman on Google+
http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/08/cbr/news/2011-08-07.html
Greg said: "The term "contra dance" as an event name seems pretty
clear."
Hmmm.
What is a contra dance? Is it the American pronunciation of the French
"contre danse" which was their version of the UK English words "country
dance", and therefore encompasses all forms of traditional dance? Or
does it mean a dance where you are opposite (contrary to) someone else?
Even if you limit it to the latter, then does it have to be a longways
set for as many as will, or can it be a three, four, five, or
whatever-number couple dance?
Can it be a Sicilian Circle where the longways set is bent to avoid end
effects, but you are still opposite someone?
Historically I believe that you would often find many different
formations at an event billed as a "contra dance", varying depending on
the decade, the country, the state, the organiser, the caller, etc.
I guess most Americans who have only been to a limited number of clubs
would expect all (most of?) the dances to be:
- longways for as many as will
- first couples Improper, or Becket formation
- flowing choreography
- no-one stationary for more than 16 beats (e.g. First Couple Balance &
Swing, finish facing down to make Lines of Four)
- containing at least one swing
- 95% of the moves to be from a set of well-know moves that they know
already
Have I left anything out?
But I have been to lots of contra dance clubs where other formations
have been used, especially in England where we tend to be exposed to a
wider variety of formations and styles at a single club.
Are you allowed to do Proper dances at a "contra dance"? Or a
four-couple dance that has all the other characteristics listed above?
Or a Sicilian Circle (space allowing)?
There are many types of square dance. I use simple ones like Cumberland
Square Eight at One Night Stands, and I wouldn't call a Modern Western
Square Dance with hash calls at a contra dance. But there are many
great squares which are much closer in style to contras, using the same
figures with only a couple of new things to learn.
I suspect many of the people at contra dances have never experienced the
full richness of the tradition, and would be very positive to some
alternate formations if they were introduced carefully, and didn't
deviate significantly from their basic expectations.
So anyway, what is a contra dance? :-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk <http://www.contrafusion.co.uk/> for
Dancing in Kent
I'm stepping ever so cautiously onto a soapbox. Though I'll strive to maintain a
civil tone, my biases will certainly become clear in what follows...
Mac's original question was "I would be interesting to hear how other callers
incorporate other formations in their programs and how they and the dancer feel
about it..."
Most of the responses, mine included, spoke to what we as callers do in our
programs and why. Embedded in our answers is the reality of being hired
professionals at the mercy of the dance organizers and subject to local customs.
For example, Joy wrote: "My region is not very square-friendly, at least not at
a contra dance. ... So given the local atmosphere, I stick to mostly improper
and Becket contra dances."
The Big Question hidden behind all of our responses so far is, "To what extent
should callers select a program based on the wishes of the dancers?" Granted,
unless one meets those expectations at least in part, one will have a hard time
getting hired again. I'm well aware of that reality.
Remember the words of Polonius in Hamlet? "To thine own self be true." What does
that mean for us as callers?
Phrased differently, is the caller's role to follow the dancers or is it to
provide leadership? This might take the form of presenting a program that is
slightly different from the norm. It might mean taking a little more time to
bring out style points, or to discuss safety on the dance floor, or to
illustrate through example a particularly interesting / challenging transition,
or even in the middle of a walkthrough to remind dancers of some basics that may
never have been learned or that need refreshing-- "A ladies chain across takes
eight counts, four for the two women to cross the set and four for the courtesy
turn. The same timing applies to right and left, four to cross and four to
turn." It might mean calling more often than is the norm; several times I've
been quietly thanked by dancers who note that most callers only call a few times
and how stressful this has been for them trying to learn a dance.
I highly recommend Bruce Hamilton's little booklet, "Notes on Teaching Country
Dance," published by CDSS. Although Bruce's background is Scottish and English
country dance, much of what he says also applies in the realm of contras and
squares. In his section on "Leadership and Social Aspects," Bruce writes:
---quoted material follows:
It is crucial to understand this: people accede to your authority because that's
the shortest way for them to get to dance. Generally speaking, they do what you
say, not out of respect for your experience, because they think you know more
than they do, because you have a big voice, because it's a habit they picked up
in school, or anything like that. They do what you say out of enlightened
self-interest.
---end quoted material
He goes on to say that because the caller has been given this authority, it is
important to exercise it.
The most common example today in "our" dance community is the contras vs.
squares divide. It's important to remember that we are part of a long and
braided chain, that these two country dance forms have been in and out of favor
at different points of time. The longways dances of the late 1700s and into the
1800s were pushed aside by the quadrilles, and then both forms were abandoned on
ballroom floors and replaced by couple dances such as the polka and waltz.
Contras were, for much of the last century, appreciated in only a handful of
communities while squares were enjoyed by (literally) millions of dancers. We
get excited because 700 people are dancing contras in the main hall at NEFFA?
Modern western square dance callers remember occasions when they called to 700
squares. Callers such as Ralph Sweet who tried to interest their square dancers
in contras found a closed audience: "Contras? Boring! You do the same thing over
and over again. What's the fun of that?" And today, in this mostly
contra-centric universe, the wheel turns again as we see the rise of communities
of young dancers who are enthusiastic about southern Appalachian old-time music
and squares and want nothing to do with contras.
People like what they know. If callers only give dancers what they already know,
how will they discover the delight to be found in other dance styles? Does this
mean that an event advertised as a contra dance, one should only present a
program of polkas and tango? Scarcely. But keep in mind that an evening billed
as a "contra dance" is a new phenomenon; the first such events date back only
about 35 years, to the Boston area in the mid-1970s.
My home dance bills itself as a contra dance, but I think of it as a country
dance, and that term in my mind encompasses more than long lines. Even within
the strict contra designation, there are proper and improper dances, duple and
triple minors, and I believe that each has a valid place in a program. I
remember a dancer who started at our local dances and then, after several years,
went cautiously out into the broader world, to one of the more distant hot (or
cool) venues. She reported that she had had a great time and then added, "There
one thing I don't understand. All they did, the whole evening, was hands four
improper or Becket dances. The whole night!"
David Millstone
Lebanon, NH
I was just thinking the same thing...we could integrate lighting signals into "techno" contras to help reinforce the dance phrasing as an alternative or adjunct to the extensive vocal cueing that is often called for with this music. I'm looking forward to exploring this idea.
Brian Hamshar
-----Original Message-----
Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 11:12:34 am
To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
From: "Dorcas Hand" <handd51(a)tekkmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Firedancing/ Hooping while calling and other possible future Burning Man innovations
I've never done techno, but this lighting plan sounds well suited to some of that. So interesting.
Dorcas Hand
-----Original Message-----
From: callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net [mailto:callers-bounces@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Greg McKenzie
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 10:09 AM
To: Caller's discussion list
Subject: Re: [Callers] Firedancing/ Hooping while calling and other possible future Burning Man innovations
I can understand Jolaine's hesitation. But the "Look at ME!" part of the
caller's ego has always been a factor at contra dances. Like Jolaine I also
feel that the caller should "fade into the background" as soon as possible,
but I recognize that I am in the minority of callers and I am willing to let
others experiment. I also recognize that burning man is a unique venue with
extreme considerations for anyone attempting to call a contra dance there.
If we learn from our mistakes then those organizing the burningman contra
will learn much. I wish I could participate. I hav
I applaud Mark for all his efforts to spread contra dancing. But I have to
ask what is the purpose of firedancing/hooping while calling? I would argue
that this is an unnecessary distraction and puts the focus on the caller
instead of on the dancers. Am I supposed to watch this person
firedance/hoop while I am trying to contra dance? I hope that organizers
will ask if this "innovation" is really making the dancing more enjoyable,
or simply for the sake of being "different." My personal opinion is that
the caller should be as invisible as possible - call clearly and get out of
the way of the dancers. There are certainly callers who contribute beyond
the calls such as Beth Molero and Nils Fredland's with their wonderful
singing voices and other callers who may clog or play spoons or some other
contribution to the experience. But firedancing/hooping is a distraction
from the dance, not a contribution to it.
May Burning Man contra grow and thrive for years to come!
JoLaine
--
JoLaine Jones-Pokorney
"We are as gods and might as well get good at it!"
- Stewart Brand
A little while ago I posted a call for a replacement caller for our
contradance at Burning Man. In that post I misidentified our caller
who is planning to firedance up and down the side of the lines while
calling - it is Tracy Wilkins. In the future we might also try to
combine hooping and calling (it took a youtube search to make me aware
how amazing hooping can be).
Now that we have several replacement volunteers, I must drop off of
this list for lack of time. But I thought before I go that I would
present some of the ideas that we hope to explore many of which are
relevant to this group. I should also say that we will be looking
for adventurous experiment- friendly callers (and to generally spread
the word to dancers/callers/musicians) into the indefinite future.
There is also a nascent Western Square Dance camp at the festival (I
don't know how experimental they are going to be.)
The Vision
Beyond all the usual magical music, dancing and camaraderie, I hope
organizing this event will allow me to 'give something back' to
contradancing.
I hope first that we will attract a significant number of new young
dancers at this huge heavily under 30 festival and that this will
snowball (CA is one of the parts of the country that is graying and
needs more young dancers).
I hope we help broaden the contradancing subculture as a whole with
new moves and dance structures - see my remarks here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/burningmancontradance/message/13
I hope that we expand musical styles and technology.
I hope that our use of video (looping slomo views from the side and
from above with L and R labels of the relevant hands/ shoulders , etc)
to enhance and speed up contradance instruction is perfected and
spreads.
I hope we can come up with ('tastefully' flashing or varying) reactive
lighting that will reinforce the AABB structure of the music and give
new dancers more cues to pick up on for their timing. And maybe we
can solve the problem of finding a kind of lighting that is easy
enough for older eyes to see with, but has the magic and romance of
darker venues.
At this year’s dance we will be providing water at both ends of all
the lines – couples who are waiting out can reach up to a dangling
tube with a beer tap and direct a flow of water into their mouths (the
beer tap and nozzle will be inside a glowing silk flower so that no
one puts the nozzle in their mouth, the whole system is NSF/ approved
for potable water).
There will be new dancers drawn in by a non-traditional approach who
are then hooked and learn to love and support the long term survival
of old time/traditional contradancing.
Thanks to all those who responded. I now have enough information to
give the Sicilian lady a different answer every week and thoroughly
confuse her :-)
I sent the request to four discussion groups - I have listed them at the
bottom of the note in case anyone wants to join the other groups. Here
are the replies to the question:
Why is the formation known as a "Sicilian Circle"?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Tim Brooks:
Cos' it's a dansa you canta refusa?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Hanny Budnick:
I have no idea where I read it, but apparently the "Sicilian" circle
started out as "Caecilian" circle, named in honor of St. Caecilia, the
muse of music.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Ramsay John Martin:
I don't KNOW the answer, but I do have an hypothesis. English dances
had men on the left and ladies on the right. I was told in Sweden that
this is a custom which came from the practice of the men taking the warm
south side of cathedrals during gatherings with the women relegated to
the cold north. Thus, after marriage, and the newlyweds turned to face
the congregation, the man was on the left and the lady on the right.
Regardless of the reality of this reasoning, the English dances did have
the sexes divided.
The Spanish waltz instead had the alternate pattern-what many of us call
a Sicilian Circle formation. Several dance manuals in the last half of
the 19th century referred to that formation "as in the Spanish dance" in
contrast to the English pattern. I hypothesize that Spain and Sicily
may have seemed similar to some English dancing masters. Today we call
the "Sicilian" formation or as it had been earlier dubbed the "Spanish"
formation by the modern designation of "improper."
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Alan Winston:
I looked into this a while back; the stuff from the 1820s is my possibly
messed up version of stuff Susan de Guardiola told me about.
Executive summary:
- There's nothing Sicilian about it.
- There's nothing Circassian about it.
The "Spanish Dance" formation (duple improper) seems to indeed have come
from Spain but been adopted by English-speaking dancing masters.
Dancing master
G.M.S. Chivers turned that longways into a circle of
couples-facing-couples in the 1820s and called it a "Chiversian" circle.
[Much detail omitted here about weird variations.] That name wasn't
particularly popular. I honestly don't know whether "Sicilian" and
"Circassian" are misprisions of "Chiversian", but I haven't seen
anything from, eg, 1840 using any of those words.
So things go along from the 1820s to the 1870s and dances in that
formation (including a specific dance sequence called the Spanish Waltz,
rather than the genre of English dances of that name, which may have
been longways dances anyway).
The English dancing masters of this period liked to assign an exotic
foreign origin to the stuff they were teaching, when they weren't
proudly proclaiming themselves the inventors of it.
In the 1860s, a specific dance in that formation called "Sicilienne
Circle" was published, with the dancing master claiming that it was
formerly popular but had fallen out of favor because of bad behavior
from dancers. (That was in Hillgrove, 1865; he was an Englishman but
published in the USA, so I don't know whether he's saying it was popular
in England or in the USA.) I can't draw a clear line from that to the
formation being called "Sicilian Circle", and I have no evidence about
how popular "Le Sicilienne" was, but at some point after that - and it
might be some time in the mid-20th century, for all I know - that was
the established name for the formation.
Hope that helps!
Full Posting at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/trad-dance-callers/message/3039
What Elias Howe has to say in 1859:
SICILIAN CIRCLE (form as for Spanish dance) 100 steps
All balance, swing four hands-ladies chain-balance to partners and
turn-right and left-all forward and back, forward and cross to face the
next couple.
So note that this is Howe calling a specific dance "Sicilian Circle" and
identifying it as "form as for Spanish dance"; to Howe, "Sicilian
Circle" isn't a genre.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
English Ceilidh Discussion Group:
http://www.cix.co.uk/~net-services/ec/#bp
Callers' Discussion List
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
Traditional Dance Callers List
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/trad-dance-callers
ECD mailing list
http://www.bacds.org/mailman/listinfo/ecd
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk <http://www.contrafusion.co.uk/> for
Dancing in Kent