As Amy and Elizabeth mentioned, I have also experienced 1s and 2s being the
CW and CCW couple, progressing along the side like in Becket. The big
difference is I'm pretty sure I learned it that the 1s whose backs are to
the inside of the circle are sliding L which would be going CCW along the
large set (but a Becket contra dance would indicate this to be CW).
Probably this is not a big problem. I learned this from square dance
"Kentucky Running Sets." A caller would have people arrange themselves in
groups of 4 in a large circle, with couples facing in or out together on
the same side of the set as their partner. Usually then there would be a
variety of square dance figures like swings, allemandes, this one cool
boomerang thing I can't remember what it's called, mountain do-si-do, dip
and dive, etc. Then 1s would slide left and 2s would stay where they are
for new neighbors.
I don't have any thoughts about which contra dances would be good for
Sicilian Circles, or whether all are possible or not. I think it's cool to
play around and figure it out, though!
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023, 12:00 AM <contracallers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
wrote:
> Send Contra Callers mailing list submissions to
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> body 'help' to
> contracallers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> contracallers-owner(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Contra Callers digest..."Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Charles Abell)
> 2. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Jonathan Sivier)
> 3. Do you add a 'do anything' move into a contra? OR other playful
> strategies? :)
> (Emily Addison)
> 4. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Winston, Alan P.)
> 5. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Amy Cann)
> 6. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Winston, Alan P.)
> 7. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Amy Cann)
> 8. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Joe Harrington)
> 9. Re: Do you add a 'do anything' move into a contra? OR other playful
> strategies? :)
> (Qui Ann)
> 10. Re: Sicilian Circle question (David Harding)
> 11. Rompin' Stompin' (Amy Wimmer)
> 12. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Jonathan Sivier)
> 13. Re: Rompin' Stompin' (Chris Page)
> 14. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Charles Abell)
> 15. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Elizabeth Bloom Albert)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Charles Abell <chuckabell(a)hotmail.com>
> To: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 20:06:37 +0000
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I may
> soon - two questions:
>
> 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
> "twos", right?
> 2. If there *are* ones and two, which couple would be considered the
> "ones" - CW or CCW?
> 3. If there *are not *typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
> ascribing those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea
> for a dance that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to
> arch first, thus the need for separate numbers.
>
> I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
> Thoughts?
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Sivier <jsivier(a)illinois.edu>
> To: New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:23:42 -0600
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> I have a Sicilian Circle dance in my collection called Dip for the
> Oyster which designates 1's and 2's to determine who ducks or arches
> first. In my notes I have 1's facing CCW and 2's facing CW. However, I
> imagine this is totally arbitrary and you could do it whichever way you
> like. In most of the Sicilian Circles I'm aware of there is no need to
> designate 1's and 2's.
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 2/4/2023 2:06 PM, Charles Abell via Contra Callers wrote:
> > Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
> may soon - two questions:
> >
> > 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
> "twos", right?
> > 2. If there /are/ ones and two, which couple would be considered the
> "ones" - CW or CCW?
> > 3. If there /are not /typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
> ascribing those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea
> for a dance that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to
> arch first, thus the need for separate numbers.
> >
> > I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
> Thoughts?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Emily Addison <emilyladdison(a)gmail.com>
> To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 15:47:02 -0500
> Subject: [Callers] Do you add a 'do anything' move into a contra? OR other
> playful strategies? :)
> Hey folks,
>
> After a number of relatively quiet caller years (parenting; pandemic),
> I've started to dig deep to expand my repertoire and up my skills. It
> feels like it's time for lots more dance fun! :)
>
> One dance that I've really enjoyed is Heartbeat Contra (by Don Flaherty -
> see below).
> Tom Calwell called it in Ottawa way back in 2010 and at the top of the
> B1, he called Al R 1.5 or ANYTHING (R shoulder round, swing, DSD).
>
> *Do any of you throw in a 'do anything' moment in an evening of contra
> programming?* I'm always looking for fun, playful moments that make
> dancers smile and this feels like a lovely one. If you throw in an
> anything moment, how do you choose when?
>
> *And do you have other strategies for adding playfulness to an evening?*
> I've got some dances which I find super playful and fun (e.g., Three's
> Company - Altered & Alternating - Paul Balliet)
>
> Thoughts on this?
>
> Thanks!
> Emily in Ottawa
>
> -------------------------------
> Heartbeat Contra (Don Flaherty)
> A1
>
> Bal Ring & Petronella Twirl
> Bal Ring & Petronella Twirl
>
> A2
> Bal Ring & N Sw
>
> B1
>
> ROB Al R 1.5 *OR ANYTHING! *(Al R, Rshoulder round, swing, DSD...
> original was RH round)
> P Sw
>
> B2
>
> Cir L 3/4
> Bal Ring & California Twirl
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Winston, Alan P." <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu>
> To: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>, Charles Abell <
> chuckabell(a)hotmail.com>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 20:47:32 +0000
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> To your questions:
>
> 1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
>
> 2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or CCW
> are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
>
> 3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
> "The Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the 1s ("those facing
> clockwise") do the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through the 1.,
> and it's fine so long as you get across who goes first. Way better to
> indicate that visually rather than just say it.
>
> -- Alan
> ________________________________________
> From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
> To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
>
> Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I may
> soon - two questions:
>
> 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
> "twos", right?
> 2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
> "ones" - CW or CCW?
> 3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried ascribing
> those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea for a dance
> that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first,
> thus the need for separate numbers.
>
> I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
> Thoughts?
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
> To: "Winston, Alan P." <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu>
> Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:11:52 -0500
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> Here's how I learned:
>
> "Everybody promenade the usual way, two-by-two around the room - now
> stop where you are."
>
> "Starting from this point right in front of me (gesture to where head
> couple of center set usually stands for contras), you're going to
> count off in pairs of couples and take hands four in this big ring.
>
> "Half of you can just stay facing the usual promenade direction - you're
> 1s"
>
> "Half of you will need to turn as a couple and face the 'wrong'
> direction - you're 2's".
>
> It links the role of 1s/2s to the familiar line-of-direction we use
> for promenading and coupledancing
>
> -- who feels most "normal", and who feels as if they're
> accommodating/supporting.
>
>
>
> On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. via Contra Callers
> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> > To your questions:
> >
> > 1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
> >
> > 2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or CCW
> > are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
> >
> > 3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
> "The
> > Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the 1s ("those facing
> clockwise") do
> > the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through the 1., and it's fine
> so
> > long as you get across who goes first. Way better to indicate that
> > visually rather than just say it.
> >
> > -- Alan
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers
> > <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
> > To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> >
> > Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
> may
> > soon - two questions:
> >
> > 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
> > "twos", right?
> > 2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
> "ones"
> > - CW or CCW?
> > 3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
> ascribing
> > those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea for a
> dance
> > that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first,
> > thus the need for separate numbers.
> >
> > I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Chuck
> > _______________________________________________
> > Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> >
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Winston, Alan P." <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu>
> To: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
> Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 21:19:50 +0000
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> Any —
>
> That’s great! I hadn’t encountered that, and I really have to put it in
> my toolbox for ONS - way faster/more fun than getting people who have no
> idea what a Sicilian *is* to pair up and form one. (The best I had up to
> this point was make a big circle, pick a pair and make them face, and then
> (in Susan Michael’s words), say “Chain Reaction - pair up like this all the
> way around.). So this’ll be good even for symmetric Sicilians.
>
> — Alan
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 1:11 PM
> To: Winston, Alan P.
> Cc: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net; Charles Abell
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
>
> Here's how I learned:
>
> "Everybody promenade the usual way, two-by-two around the room - now
> stop where you are."
>
> "Starting from this point right in front of me (gesture to where head
> couple of center set usually stands for contras), you're going to
> count off in pairs of couples and take hands four in this big ring.
>
> "Half of you can just stay facing the usual promenade direction - you're
> 1s"
>
> "Half of you will need to turn as a couple and face the 'wrong'
> direction - you're 2's".
>
> It links the role of 1s/2s to the familiar line-of-direction we use
> for promenading and coupledancing
>
> -- who feels most "normal", and who feels as if they're
> accommodating/supporting.
>
>
>
> On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. via Contra Callers
> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> > To your questions:
> >
> > 1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
> >
> > 2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or CCW
> > are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
> >
> > 3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
> "The
> > Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the 1s ("those facing
> clockwise") do
> > the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through the 1., and it's fine
> so
> > long as you get across who goes first. Way better to indicate that
> > visually rather than just say it.
> >
> > -- Alan
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers
> > <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
> > To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> >
> > Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
> may
> > soon - two questions:
> >
> > 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
> > "twos", right?
> > 2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
> "ones"
> > - CW or CCW?
> > 3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
> ascribing
> > those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea for a
> dance
> > that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first,
> > thus the need for separate numbers.
> >
> > I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Chuck
> > _______________________________________________
> > Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> >
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
> To: "Winston, Alan P." <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu>
> Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:39:39 -0500
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> Glad you like it!
>
> For what it's worth, at a ONS I often do a scatter mixer that's
> basically half of "Haste to the Wedding" -
>
> Circle L, circle R
> Star R star L
> everybody bow, promenade and find someone else
>
> for a little, then turn the scatter promenade into the big ring and go
> from there.
>
> On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
> > Any —
> >
> > That’s great! I hadn’t encountered that, and I really have to put it in
> my
> > toolbox for ONS - way faster/more fun than getting people who have no
> idea
> > what a Sicilian *is* to pair up and form one. (The best I had up to this
> > point was make a big circle, pick a pair and make them face, and then (in
> > Susan Michael’s words), say “Chain Reaction - pair up like this all the
> way
> > around.). So this’ll be good even for symmetric Sicilians.
> >
> > — Alan
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 1:11 PM
> > To: Winston, Alan P.
> > Cc: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net; Charles Abell
> > Subject: Re: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> >
> > Here's how I learned:
> >
> > "Everybody promenade the usual way, two-by-two around the room - now
> > stop where you are."
> >
> > "Starting from this point right in front of me (gesture to where head
> > couple of center set usually stands for contras), you're going to
> > count off in pairs of couples and take hands four in this big ring.
> >
> > "Half of you can just stay facing the usual promenade direction - you're
> 1s"
> >
> > "Half of you will need to turn as a couple and face the 'wrong'
> > direction - you're 2's".
> >
> > It links the role of 1s/2s to the familiar line-of-direction we use
> > for promenading and coupledancing
> >
> > -- who feels most "normal", and who feels as if they're
> > accommodating/supporting.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. via Contra Callers
> > <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> >> To your questions:
> >>
> >> 1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
> >>
> >> 2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or
> CCW
> >> are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
> >>
> >> 3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
> >> "The
> >> Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the 1s ("those facing
> clockwise")
> >> do
> >> the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through the 1., and it's fine
> so
> >> long as you get across who goes first. Way better to indicate that
> >> visually rather than just say it.
> >>
> >> -- Alan
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers
> >> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> >> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
> >> To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> >> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> >>
> >> Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
> may
> >> soon - two questions:
> >>
> >> 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
> >> "twos", right?
> >> 2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
> >> "ones"
> >> - CW or CCW?
> >> 3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
> ascribing
> >> those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea for a
> >> dance
> >> that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first,
> >> thus the need for separate numbers.
> >>
> >> I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Chuck
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to
> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Joe Harrington <contradancerjoe(a)gmail.com>
> To: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
> Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:49:36 -0500
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> Newbie question: Why is it called a "Sicilian" circle?
>
> While certain dances came from long ago with that label, wouldn't
> many/most contras work, as long as the circle isn't too small and the 1s
> and 2s are comparably active?
>
> --jh--
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 4:39 PM Amy Cann via Contra Callers <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
>> Glad you like it!
>>
>> For what it's worth, at a ONS I often do a scatter mixer that's
>> basically half of "Haste to the Wedding" -
>>
>> Circle L, circle R
>> Star R star L
>> everybody bow, promenade and find someone else
>>
>> for a little, then turn the scatter promenade into the big ring and go
>> from there.
>>
>> On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> > Any —
>> >
>> > That’s great! I hadn’t encountered that, and I really have to put it
>> in my
>> > toolbox for ONS - way faster/more fun than getting people who have no
>> idea
>> > what a Sicilian *is* to pair up and form one. (The best I had up to
>> this
>> > point was make a big circle, pick a pair and make them face, and then
>> (in
>> > Susan Michael’s words), say “Chain Reaction - pair up like this all the
>> way
>> > around.). So this’ll be good even for symmetric Sicilians.
>> >
>> > — Alan
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
>> > Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 1:11 PM
>> > To: Winston, Alan P.
>> > Cc: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net; Charles Abell
>> > Subject: Re: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
>> >
>> > Here's how I learned:
>> >
>> > "Everybody promenade the usual way, two-by-two around the room - now
>> > stop where you are."
>> >
>> > "Starting from this point right in front of me (gesture to where head
>> > couple of center set usually stands for contras), you're going to
>> > count off in pairs of couples and take hands four in this big ring.
>> >
>> > "Half of you can just stay facing the usual promenade direction -
>> you're 1s"
>> >
>> > "Half of you will need to turn as a couple and face the 'wrong'
>> > direction - you're 2's".
>> >
>> > It links the role of 1s/2s to the familiar line-of-direction we use
>> > for promenading and coupledancing
>> >
>> > -- who feels most "normal", and who feels as if they're
>> > accommodating/supporting.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. via Contra Callers
>> > <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>> >> To your questions:
>> >>
>> >> 1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
>> >>
>> >> 2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or
>> CCW
>> >> are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
>> >>
>> >> 3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
>> >> "The
>> >> Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the 1s ("those facing
>> clockwise")
>> >> do
>> >> the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through the 1., and it's
>> fine so
>> >> long as you get across who goes first. Way better to indicate that
>> >> visually rather than just say it.
>> >>
>> >> -- Alan
>> >> ________________________________________
>> >> From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers
>> >> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
>> >> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
>> >> To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>> >> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
>> >>
>> >> Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
>> may
>> >> soon - two questions:
>> >>
>> >> 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
>> >> "twos", right?
>> >> 2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
>> >> "ones"
>> >> - CW or CCW?
>> >> 3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
>> ascribing
>> >> those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea for a
>> >> dance
>> >> that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch
>> first,
>> >> thus the need for separate numbers.
>> >>
>> >> I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially
>> successful.
>> >> Thoughts?
>> >>
>> >> Chuck
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>> >> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>> >>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Qui Ann <quiann2(a)gmail.com>
> To: Emily Addison <emilyladdison(a)gmail.com>
> Cc: callers(a)sharedweight.net
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:29:41 -0800
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Do you add a 'do anything' move into a contra? OR
> other playful strategies? :)
> I call Hot Buttered Rolls by Perry Shafran and sometimes modify the B1 to
> “pass P, shadow DSD” and then invite them to sort out with their shadow as
> to what they want to do.
> https://www.ibiblio.org/contradance/thecallersbox/dance.php?id=7821
>
> Same with "Vote with Your Feet" by Bob Isaacs.
> https://www.ibiblio.org/contradance/thecallersbox/dance.php?id=1956
> In this video you can hear me say “do something” when it comes to that
> part.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKP1xR-fjgk&ab_channel=albatrossace101
>
> Jacqui
>
> On Feb 4, 2023, at 12:47, Emily Addison via Contra Callers <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> After a number of relatively quiet caller years (parenting; pandemic),
> I've started to dig deep to expand my repertoire and up my skills. It
> feels like it's time for lots more dance fun! :)
>
> One dance that I've really enjoyed is Heartbeat Contra (by Don Flaherty -
> see below).
> Tom Calwell called it in Ottawa way back in 2010 and at the top of the
> B1, he called Al R 1.5 or ANYTHING (R shoulder round, swing, DSD).
>
> *Do any of you throw in a 'do anything' moment in an evening of contra
> programming?* I'm always looking for fun, playful moments that make
> dancers smile and this feels like a lovely one. If you throw in an
> anything moment, how do you choose when?
>
> *And do you have other strategies for adding playfulness to an evening?*
> I've got some dances which I find super playful and fun (e.g., Three's
> Company - Altered & Alternating - Paul Balliet)
>
> Thoughts on this?
>
> Thanks!
> Emily in Ottawa
>
> -------------------------------
> Heartbeat Contra (Don Flaherty)
> A1
> Bal Ring & Petronella Twirl
> Bal Ring & Petronella Twirl
>
> A2
> Bal Ring & N Sw
>
> B1
> ROB Al R 1.5 *OR ANYTHING! *(Al R, Rshoulder round, swing, DSD...
> original was RH round)
> P Sw
>
> B2
> Cir L 3/4
> Bal Ring & California Twirl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Harding <dharding101(a)comcast.net>
> To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:52:30 -0600
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> There is a specific old dance bearing the name "Sicilian Circle". You
> can find it in, for instance, this 1857 instruction book from the
> Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/musdi.094/ The name has
> come to imply the formation and general pattern.
>
> On 2/4/2023 3:49 PM, Joe Harrington via Contra Callers wrote:
> > Newbie question: Why is it called a "Sicilian" circle?
> >
> > While certain dances came from long ago with that label, wouldn't
> > many/most contras work, as long as the circle isn't too small and the
> > 1s and 2s are comparably active?
> >
> > --jh--
> >
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Amy Wimmer <amywimmer(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 15:04:59 -0800
> Subject: [Callers] Rompin' Stompin'
> Hey All,
>
> What are your favorite barn burner contras? I have a few, but they get old.
>
> -Amy
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Sivier <jsivier(a)illinois.edu>
> To: New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 17:18:12 -0600
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> It appears that in that book the dance formation is given as a
> longways, duple, improper set. Not the circle of couple facing couple that
> we typically connect to the Sicilian circle formation. The dance just
> before it is the Spanish Dance and gives as the formation, "The first
> couple at the head of the room, with their backs to the wall; the next
> couple facing the first; the third couple with their backs to the second;
> the fourth couple facing the third; and all the rest are formed in the same
> manner, every two couples facing each other, without regard to numbers."
>
> Then it says, "As each couple arrives at the end of the room, they
> must turn round and wait for the next couple to meet them, the gentlemen
> being careful to have their ladies always on the right hand.
>
> This seems to be describing a longways dance instead of a circle.
> Under Sicilian Circle it says, "This dance is formed precisely the same as
> the Spanish Dance," so that would seem to be a longways dance as well.
>
> I think I have read that Spanish Dance was also used in the 19th
> century as the generic name for the circle of couples facing each other.
> So were these dances described somewhere with the circle formation, or was
> that just something that someone did at one point and it stuck?
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 2/4/2023 4:52 PM, David Harding via Contra Callers wrote:
> > There is a specific old dance bearing the name "Sicilian Circle". You
> can find it in, for instance, this 1857 instruction book from the Library
> of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/musdi.094/ The name has come to
> imply the formation and general pattern.
> >
> > On 2/4/2023 3:49 PM, Joe Harrington via Contra Callers wrote:
> >> Newbie question: Why is it called a "Sicilian" circle?
> >>
> >> While certain dances came from long ago with that label, wouldn't
> many/most contras work, as long as the circle isn't too small and the 1s
> and 2s are comparably active?
> >>
> >> --jh--
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Chris Page <chriscpage(a)gmail.com>
> To: Amy Wimmer <amywimmer(a)gmail.com>
> Cc: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:09:37 -0800
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Rompin' Stompin'
> What do you mean by "barn burner contra"?
>
> Confused,
> -Chris Page
> Los Angeles, CA
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Charles Abell <chuckabell(a)hotmail.com>
> To: New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>,
> Jonathan Sivier <jsivier(a)illinois.edu>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:13:28 +0000
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> Thanks for the comments, everyone. Very helpful, especially the tip about
> promenading into the proper formation.
>
> I noticed no one has responded yet to the question about whether a large
> number of contra dances could be run as Sicilian circles. I'd be curious to
> hear what others say, but my instinct is that it would maybe be
> problematic. The curvature of the format would seem to make heys and other
> figures more challenging to execute - the spacing between minor sets might
> also be impacted in that formation. So, for instance, when doing a sequence
> like "alle right N1 1/2x along the side then alle left next N 1x", the
> distance between N #1 and N#2 might easily be greater than in a regular
> contra. Anyway, this is just an initial gut reaction - let's see what the
> hive mind thinks.
>
> As for "barnburner" dances, that's a broad term, and there are so many to
> choose from. How about, as a starting bid, "From Here to Infinity" by Bob
> Isaacs...
>
> Chuck
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jonathan Sivier via Contra Callers <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 4, 2023 11:18 PM
> *To:* New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> *Subject:* [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
>
> It appears that in that book the dance formation is given as a
> longways, duple, improper set. Not the circle of couple facing couple that
> we typically connect to the Sicilian circle formation. The dance just
> before it is the Spanish Dance and gives as the formation, "The first
> couple at the head of the room, with their backs to the wall; the next
> couple facing the first; the third couple with their backs to the second;
> the fourth couple facing the third; and all the rest are formed in the same
> manner, every two couples facing each other, without regard to numbers."
>
> Then it says, "As each couple arrives at the end of the room, they
> must turn round and wait for the next couple to meet them, the gentlemen
> being careful to have their ladies always on the right hand.
>
> This seems to be describing a longways dance instead of a circle.
> Under Sicilian Circle it says, "This dance is formed precisely the same as
> the Spanish Dance," so that would seem to be a longways dance as well.
>
> I think I have read that Spanish Dance was also used in the 19th
> century as the generic name for the circle of couples facing each other.
> So were these dances described somewhere with the circle formation, or was
> that just something that someone did at one point and it stuck?
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 2/4/2023 4:52 PM, David Harding via Contra Callers wrote:
> > There is a specific old dance bearing the name "Sicilian Circle". You
> can find it in, for instance, this 1857 instruction book from the Library
> of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/musdi.094/ The name has come to
> imply the formation and general pattern.
> >
> > On 2/4/2023 3:49 PM, Joe Harrington via Contra Callers wrote:
> >> Newbie question: Why is it called a "Sicilian" circle?
> >>
> >> While certain dances came from long ago with that label, wouldn't
> many/most contras work, as long as the circle isn't too small and the 1s
> and 2s are comparably active?
> >>
> >> --jh--
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Elizabeth Bloom Albert <ealbert75(a)gmail.com>
> To: Charles Abell <chuckabell(a)hotmail.com>
> Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 22:01:30 -0600
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> Offering up the following:
>
> *Burning Ring of Arches **by Elizabeth Bloom Albert*
>
> Sicilian Circle. QUADRUPLE Progression dance
>
>
>
> *Key: 1’s = Couples who are facing CW around circle*
>
> * 2’s = Couples who are facing CCW around circle*
>
>
>
> A1 1’s Arch, 2’s Duck under;
>
> 2’s Arch, 1’s Duck under;
>
> 1’s Arch, 2’s Duck under;
>
> 2’s Arch, 1’s Duck under
>
>
>
> A2 Ladies Chain (to Neighbor)
>
> Ladies Chain (to Partner)
>
>
>
> B1 Ladies Alle-R 1 and ½
>
> Swing Neighbor
>
> End swing facing partner.
>
>
>
> B2 Circle Left 3/4
>
> Swing Partner
>
> End swing facing original direction.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 2:06 PM Charles Abell via Contra Callers <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
>> may soon - two questions:
>>
>> 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
>> "twos", right?
>> 2. If there *are* ones and two, which couple would be considered the
>> "ones" - CW or CCW?
>> 3. If there *are not *typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
>> ascribing those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea
>> for a dance that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to
>> arch first, thus the need for separate numbers.
>>
>> I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Chuck
>> _______________________________________________
>> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>>
>
>
> --
>
> * Elizabeth Bloom Albert *
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I may soon - two questions:
1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other "twos", right?
2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the "ones" - CW or CCW?
3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried ascribing those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea for a dance that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first, thus the need for separate numbers.
I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful. Thoughts?
Chuck
So I've been experimenting with the new ChatGBT program, mainly to determine whether my job as an English teacher is in danger of becoming obsolete (it's not). While I was at it, I decided to see if it could write a functional contra dance. This is what I entered, and what it produced.
Write a 32-bar contra dance that starts improper, includes a partner swing, a neighbor swing, and a full hey:
(8 bars) Start improper with your partner, swing left and right, Come back to place with a do-si-do in sight
(8 bars) Swing your neighbor with a smile on your face, Then circle left, it's a wondrous embrace
(8 bars) Swing your partner with a twirl and a spin, Then switch places, and let the fun begin
(8 bars) Full hey now, join hands and take a bow, The contra dance is just getting started now!
End the contra dance with a grand finale, Swinging and smiling, what a perfect finale!
I don't think callers' and dance choreographers' jobs are in much danger either!
I am super excited about this as I too have been looking for material that
meets this kind of crowd need!
Thank you :)
Emily in Ottawa
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:00 AM <
contracallers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Send Contra Callers mailing list submissions to
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> body 'help' to
> contracallers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> contracallers-owner(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Contra Callers digest..."Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: dances in that space between community and beginners
> (Meg Dedolph)
> 2. Re: dances in that space between community and beginners
> (John Sweeney)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Meg Dedolph <meg.dedolph(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Tepfer, Seth" <labst(a)emory.edu>
> Cc: Contra Callers <contracallers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 09:01:32 -0600
> Subject: [Callers] Re: dances in that space between community and beginners
> Thanks, Seth. I agree there’s a shortage of repertoire in that sweet spot
> around Family Contra/ Jefferson and Lincoln, etc, so I’ll be trying these
> dances out soon.
> Meg
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:15 PM Tepfer, Seth via Contra Callers <
> contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello Callers
>>
>> Last Saturday I found myself at a dance that had a large number of first
>> time dancers (50+) and a fair number of experienced dancers. This is a
>> fascinating place to be - more than Galopede, but pre-Chain in teaching.
>> Family Contra by Sherry Nevins is the canonical dance. (
>> https://www.ibiblio.org/contradance/thecallersbox/dance.php?id=10422)
>>
>> I was inspired to come up with 3 others. Have you seen any of these
>> before? Are they simply re-writes of existing dances?
>>
>> Title: untitled
>>
>> Author: Seth Tepfer
>>
>> Formation: Improper
>>
>> Date: 1/21/2023
>>
>> A1: Circle Left; Neighbor Swing
>>
>> A2: Long Lines (8); 1s DSD (8);
>>
>> B1: 1s ‘lady round two, gent drop thru; gent round two, lady drop through’
>>
>> B2: 1s balance and swing
>>
>>
>> Title: Dahlonega Cozy
>>
>> Author: Seth Tepfer
>>
>> Formation: improper
>>
>> Date: 1/21/2023
>>
>> A1: N DSD (8); neighbor swing (8)
>>
>> A2: Down the hall, come back cozy
>>
>> B1: cloverleaf 3 places (8); partner swing (8)
>>
>> B2: Circle left 3/4 (8); bal ring (4), pass thru (4)
>>
>>
>> Title: Dahlonega ContraFlow(tm) and Weave
>>
>> Author: Seth Tepfer
>>
>> Formation: Sicillian
>>
>> Date: 1/21/2023
>>
>> A1: [weave left, weave right] x2
>>
>> A2: N DSD (8); neighbor swing (8)
>>
>> B1: larks allemande left 1.5 (8); partner swing (8)
>>
>> B2: bal ring 2X (8); circle right 3/4, weave right
>>
>>
>>
>> Seth Tepfer, MBA, CSM, PMP (he, him, his)
>> Senior IT Manager, Emory Primate Center
>> _______________________________________________
>> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: John Sweeney <john(a)modernjive.com>
> To: "'Contra Callers'" <contracallers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:44:40 -0000
> Subject: [Callers] Re: dances in that space between community and beginners
>
> Hi,
>
> I work with many groups that aren’t skilled in contra, so I
> wrote these. I hope some of them help.
>
>
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/ChainnHey.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/CheekboneCity.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/Dopeca.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/FindingYourBalance.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/GirlsofOakhill.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/GrapevineJig.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/Pestchye.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/TrainingWheels.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/BalancingAct.html
>
> http://contrafusion.co.uk/Dances/TheMadGypsy.html
>
>
>
>
>
> Happy dancing,
>
> John
>
>
>
> John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 & 07802
> 940 574
>
> http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
Hello Callers
Last Saturday I found myself at a dance that had a large number of first time dancers (50+) and a fair number of experienced dancers. This is a fascinating place to be - more than Galopede, but pre-Chain in teaching. Family Contra by Sherry Nevins is the canonical dance. (https://www.ibiblio.org/contradance/thecallersbox/dance.php?id=10422)
I was inspired to come up with 3 others. Have you seen any of these before? Are they simply re-writes of existing dances?
Title: untitled
Author: Seth Tepfer
Formation: Improper
Date: 1/21/2023
A1: Circle Left; Neighbor Swing
A2: Long Lines (8); 1s DSD (8);
B1: 1s ‘lady round two, gent drop thru; gent round two, lady drop through’
B2: 1s balance and swing
Title: Dahlonega Cozy
Author: Seth Tepfer
Formation: improper
Date: 1/21/2023
A1: N DSD (8); neighbor swing (8)
A2: Down the hall, come back cozy
B1: cloverleaf 3 places (8); partner swing (8)
B2: Circle left 3/4 (8); bal ring (4), pass thru (4)
Title: Dahlonega ContraFlow(tm) and Weave
Author: Seth Tepfer
Formation: Sicillian
Date: 1/21/2023
A1: [weave left, weave right] x2
A2: N DSD (8); neighbor swing (8)
B1: larks allemande left 1.5 (8); partner swing (8)
B2: bal ring 2X (8); circle right 3/4, weave right
Seth Tepfer, MBA, CSM, PMP (he, him, his)
Senior IT Manager, Emory Primate Center
Hopefully a fun question. At the same time as the pandemic, I moved to my
rural hometown, and (after some years of hunkering) have gone from
'sometimes' to 'occasionally' to now monthly hosting a barn dance with a
great band on a wonderful dance floor here.
I have promised the dancers "as we get practice, and as we build up skills
in the community, gradually we can start doing dances with more moves," and
some of the regulars asked for a 'practice dance' with a few of these fun
ones, so I now get to plan one. But I suddenly realized, I haven't myself
danced contra in such a long time that most of the names of the 'old
favorites" have abdicated the brainspace they used to hold.
So, *what I'm asking for: *
*Remind me the names of simple, fun dances that include some of my favorite
figures (roll-away with half sashay, Rory O'Moore, maybe box circulate or
butterfly whirl?) *I want to give them a taste for "why it's worth it to
get more complex" without actually getting TOO complex yet (probably going
to avoid becket formation, and I don't think I want to teach heys yet. I
haven't taught courtesy turns (chain, R&L through, et al) yet, but I could
probably do so either at this practice or a future one. Most of our
progression thus far have been "pass through", but if there's a good
candidate dance with a non 'pass through' progression, I can modify it a
skosh to keep things consistent.
I am attaching the program from our last dance to give you a sense of where
we are ( https://contradb.com/programs/278 ). This practice dance is going
to have 12 dancers, who have understood progression as we've done it in Do
Si Three and in Jefferson's Remorse, and on the dance floor they've been
some of the ones helping newcomers understand.
Thanks in advance for your recommendations!
Allison
--
Allison Jonjak
allisonjonjak(a)gmail.com
allisonjonjak.com
We had an interesting and challenging situation come up at Contra Knights,
the UCF student contra club, last night. I’m interested in your thoughts
and advice, in case it has come up before, which it must have. I’m going to
relate it as I perceived it, though someone more perceptive might have made
some observations early on that would have alerted them to the nature of
the situation.
Last night was the second dance of the semester and officer elections were
scheduled during the break. Just at the end of my newbie lesson, a group of
nine women dribbled in as a group. They were really enthusiastic to learn,
and they were about 30% of the people in the room at that point, so I
rewound the lesson a bit to at least teach them the swing.
They had joined the teaching circle with their purses and backpacks. I
invited them to put their stuff on the chairs at the sides, including their
jackets, as we dance to up-tempo pop music and it can get sweaty. That’s
where it got interesting. Some put their stuff down, but they couldn’t
take off their jackets. That’s when I noticed some of them wearing
headscarves. Ok, no worries, wear jackets, that’s fine. We love diversity
here.
I tried matching them with experienced dancers, which some accepted and
some did not. Some said they just wanted to dance together and not with
anybody else. O-kay. I explained that in this dance we all dance with each
other in a sequence and we don’t control whom we’re dancing with. Well,
that’s ok, as long as we don’t touch men.
This, of course, explained the refused partners; they were all men. How
are we going to manage that in a gender-neutral dance? It’s not like I
could put them in the men’s role. Someone suggested they turn all moves
into do-si-dos. I was at a momentary loss, when our club president-to-be
(elected later in the night) suggested putting them in a line of their own.
That made them happy, though it was a very short line.
Then the rest of what turned out to be the Lebanese Student Society came
into the room. Their meeting in a neighboring room had just ended. There
were more women, enough to make the small line danceable. There were a lot
of men, and they had a really difficult time taking partners. I had minor
sets with five or six dancers (yes, experienced dancers can do it). I told
them it would not work that way, but they said they’d make it work, and
nothing I could say got anywhere. I was conscious of the original dancers
who had been there 30 minutes now, had done the workshop, and were eager to
dance.
So, the men also got their own line, but things in that line got a bit
crazy during the first walk-through. Possibly because of the discomfort
some may have felt dancing with other men, many there were more interested
in goofing off or boasting to one another than in paying any attention to
me, even after I cranked the mic volume way up and admonished them to be
quiet and listen. There was some genuine interest in that line, and one of
the louder argument points I heard was someone shouting to quiet the line,
as they were here to learn.
At this point there were around 30 Lebanese students in two lines of 3-4
minor sets each and 20 originals, who had joined through the newbie
session, which was evenly split between newbies and experienced dancers.
Their line was quiet, but getting quite impatient at this point. I was
afraid to lose them. I was really afraid of what would happen in the
election later on if the Lebanese club stayed, as they outnumbered the
originals.
It became clear that the Lebanese men were not going to get far, but they
didn’t realize it yet. I really didn’t want to throw them out, since some
really did want to learn and we are an inclusive club with too few members.
I did say I would kick them out if they didn’t quiet down, which worked
momentarily.
I decided to forge ahead and call to the group of 20. Either the guys were
going to get it or they’d maybe leave. If their noise disrupted the line of
originals, then I would ask them to leave. I put on a tune and called an
easy dance, cranking the volume above the din. The originals danced it fine
and seemed to have a good time. The guy line dispersed and said they’d come
in time for the workshop next time. The ladies left with them.
The originals nearly all stayed. We had a fun rest of our night and held
our officer election. While last night was a unique event, 50% newbies is
common and we think it’s why we get so few dancers to stay in the club more
than three nights. So, one of the changes is a new, occasional, no-newbies
night, so the experienced dancers can dance something more complex than
Airpants.
Are there ways to calm an unruly crowd? I have a fairly decent one-night
stand routine, but I worried I’d lose my originals if we went over to that.
I felt I could have taught them something if only I could just have gotten
their attention. Throwing them out would have been uncomfortable, at best.
So, could I have done this any better? Has your dance ever been invaded,
and how did you handle it?
Thanks,
—jh—
Joe Harrington
Faculty advisor and caller to Contra Knights, the UCF contra club
Organizer, Greater Orlando Contra Dance
Contraknights.org
FB, Ig: Contra Knights
contradancerjoe(a)gmail.com
The short version of this post is, how should I organize my dances? But,
I'm sure if I ask that, the thread will have 100 replies and lots of
confusion. My search of the list archives and web were surprisingly spotty
on this question, with lots of anecdotes and no summary or comparison. And
I'm not just asking for myself. While I've got a whopping 15 evenings of
dance calling under my belt, I'm being called on to train some students to
call for our college club, and they're asking the same question.
So, I'm looking for one or more summaries from those wiser than I (ok, low
bar!) of the kinds of systems for cards. This might better be asked as,
what are the different approaches to programming dances, and what
organizing systems make each of those easier?
In a workshop of his last summer, Bob Isaacs related his system of colored
cards for easy, hard, bouncy, flowy, sweetheart, and divorce-reconcile
dances (I think those were the categories). Call easy dances first, call a
sweetheart right after the break when they're most likely to dance with the
person they came with. Save hard for festivals. Give them variety.
But, I've wanted more categories, and what about finding the bouncy
sweethearts? I'm really busy, so the idea of re-copying a hundred or more
cards to make a new system doesn't thrill me, if I don't like my initial
system. Maybe I'll get a database system to select dances with, and then
have a set of alphabetized printed cards for the actual calling, though
what if I'm wrong and need to change my program, as has already happened a
few times when a ton of newbies shows up? I'm interested in hearing about
anything particularly clever or efficient, especially if it doesn't involve
a computer or tablet.
A comparison of the different computer systems would also be welcome. I'm
aware of programs by Will Loving and Colin Hume. I asked on one Facebook
group for a comparison of these but got no response. Is the Caller's Box
up to real-time dance selection at an event? That presumes wi-fi, of
course, or at least cell signal.
I'll toss in one amusing and possibly workable paper system, for a
dedicated and extremely nerdy caller, which might be me...
I heard recently (I believe from Angela DeCarlis) of a mechanical sorting
system based on the Jacquard loom concept that became the Hollerith punched
card system. I've never seen it in use. Does anyone do this?
Figure out the ten or so characteristics you might want to sort on. For
example, easy, medium, hard, bouncy, flowy, separates partners, sweetheart
(keeps partners together), etc. Take a stack of cards and drill holes near
the bottom edge, one per characteristic (you can drill a stack of cards if
you sandwich them between wood and clamp them). Now, on a given card,
punch out the rest of the paper between the hole and the edge of the card
for each hole the card DOESN'T match. So, for an easy dance, you'd punch
out the rest of the paper for the medium and hard holes (among others), but
leave the easy hole intact. If you make a mistake, just fold a piece of
tape over the gap above the hole to close the gap.
Now, when you want to look at your easy, flowy, sweetheart dances, flip the
stack so the holes are up, push a pencil or knitting needle through the
"easy" hole and lift. Then, in the ones you pulled, push through the flowy
hole and lift, and finally for that set poke through the sweetheart hole
and lift. Those are the easy, flowy, sweetheart dances. If you want the
medium or hard dances that are bouncy and that separate partners, you pull
first the medium and then the hard dances, combine them, and then pull the
bouncies from that set and the separators from that third pull. And so on.
Good hole alignment and clean punching would matter, I think. If you are a
real dance sorting fanatic, you could get like 30 holes around the card
edges, but that would limit the writing space.
I predict this will be all the rage, post-apocalypse...at least until we
run out of cards. ;-)
--jh--
Joe Harrington
Organizer, Greater Orlando Contra Dance
Faculty Advisor, Contra Knights, the UCF contra dancing club
contraknights.org
FB, Ig: Contra Knights
contradancerjoe(a)gmail.com
Hi fellow callers :)
I'm doing a big reorg of my dance cards. This includes looking closely at
the dances I have, hunting out new material to fill some gaps, and also
rethink how I organize my dance cards (which are on paper). I have a
related question....
Do you use any highlights, underlines, or other ways to visually emphasize
specific moments in your dances?
For instance, maybe you highlight swings or underline recovery spots in a
dance?
I'm currently wondering about marking the spots where movements
stop/change.
I remember being in a dance musician workshop with Andrew VanNorstrand long
ago where he talked about the key points of the dance being where dancers
stopped their flow in one direction. (I'm not phrasing the concept nearly
as well as he did). ... ... think of the LLFB (that moment of being) or
coming together for a balance.
I'm feeling like those moments would be great to flag in a strong visual
way so I can quickly see them as I think they impact the experience of the
dance, tips to provide the musicians, etc.
However, I'm interested in any visual cues you use on your cards to
highlight key information.
Thoughts on all this???
Thanks!
Emily Addison
Ottawa, Ontario