Code's Compiling by Sam Whited (Duple becket)
A1. Neighbor dosido (8); Partner see saw (8)
A2. Shadow swing (16)
B1. Balance and petronella (8); Balance and petronella (8)
B2. Partner swing (8); Left diagonal: Right and left through (8)
Hi Sam,
Just a few suggestions.
Seesaw has multiple meanings; it could be a left shoulder dosido
(old MWSD definition), it could be a left shoulder gypsy (current MWSD
definition), it could be the men walking in a dosido path around a
stationary lady (see 37 seconds in at
http://squaredancehistory.org/items/show/654).
Whereas dosido (which has countless spellings and more meanings) has
been standardised in the contra community, I don't believe seesaw has, so I
would always specify which one I mean.
When you say "Shadow swing" you haven't yet established who the
shadow is. I guess you mean the person beside you in the long lines, but it
depends on the dance; your shadow could be some distance away. Again, I
would suggest you specify who you mean.
Balance and Petronella: I guess you mean Balance the Ring and
Petronella. The original dance from which the Petronella move was taken
didn't have hands joined in a ring - see
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TamzPchX--I So unless you say it is a
ring/circle readers might assume you are using the original move and not
join hands. Again, it helps to make things clear if you use a few more
words.
Hope that helps.
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
In light of the earlier discussion about both double-progression and
dances with neighbor swing that don't have circle left 3/4, I wrote the
following. I'd first like to double-check that this doesn't already
exist under some other name, nor does the name exist for some other
dance; I'd also like feedback on the choreography.
Orange You Glad We Met?
Becket
A1
Men L allemande 1/2 (4)
Neighbor B&S (12)
A2
L star 1/2 to prev neighbor (6)
R star full to current neighbor (10)
B1
Pass thru current neighbor to new neighbor (4)
PROGRESSION
End in wave
Balance wave (4)
Square thru 3.5 (8)
B2
Partner B&S (16)
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
"It's 106 miles to Chicago. We have a full tank of gas, a half-pack of
cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses." "Hit it."
Sam asked for some samples of less formal ECD:
This is a demonstration team using lots of bits from different dances,
together with some fun choreography:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXzEy9qzeSQ
This is also a demo team, but they are doing a selection of dances that are
often done over here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIIOMCz0jFc
The sequence at 2:17 is a traditional "contra" dance called "Pins and
Needles" - short sets which are joining across the hall for the waves.
The sequence at 3:23 is "Dorset Four Hand Reel".
We dance both of those regularly at our local club.
This is some American dancers having fun doing 17th Century dances from
Playford's "English Dancing Master":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQ35ZkLkJJ4#thttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3uWRbXFBM4
I strongly believe that this is much more like the way the dances were
danced in the 17th century, with lots of stepping and energy - anyway that
is how I teach them!
A three couple version of Portsmouth at Chippenham festival a couple of
years ago in the Zesty Playford session:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65xy_6XC1_Y
(I'm in the middle during the first part of the video, tall guy with grey
hair, white shirt, blue trousers (sorry, pants!))
The caller asked us to rant or step all the way through.
Notice that in all these examples there is lots of stepping rather than
walking. That is one of the reasons you will end up with a healthy glow! :-)
Hope that helps.
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Sam said, "I tried ECD a couple of times, and while I enjoyed the people,
and thought a lot of the dances were really interesting, I couldn't help but
wonder why I'd want to do something that didn't leave me sweaty and
breathless afterwards."
It doesn't have to be like that!
Come to one of my English country dances and I'll get you sweating! :-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Hi
I am designing workshop for a dance weekend here in Australia and would like to crowd source some inspiration:
Simply answer the question - what made you addicted to contra?
Looking forward to your answers
Cheers
Jeanette
"The piano - 88 little mistakes waiting to happen." Peter Barnes.
If you have the sequences for any of the following dances, please send me a private message:
Hang
Time (Isaacs/AUman)
I
Wish They All Could Be California Twirls (Jim Kitch)
Moody
Street (Rosen)
Round
the House by Bob Isaacs
Sneak
Peek (Bob Isaacs)
Square
Affair (Becky Hill)
Walk
the Walk (Bob Isaacs)
Thanks
Michael Fuerst 802 N Broadway Urbana IL 61801 217-239-5844
P.E.,
That same sequence change is generated in some dances by having the #1 gent
do a "Right hands high, left hands low" figure while the other gent turns
alone. The move is different, but you might find some existing
choreography/dances that inspire you (or that you might avoid repeating).
Unfortunately, I can't provide titles offhand.
--Jerome
--
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0858
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
"We should consider every day lost on which we have not danced at least
once."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
Hello, all!
I'm look at a down-the-hall move and wondering if it has been done before, and if so with what results, so any feedback would be appreciated. Results mainly meaning: did it cause confusion for the dancers/ did they enjoy it.
Improper, 1's between 2's, line of four down the hall, gent #1 turns in place holding both ladies who pivot around him. Gent #2 turns alone.
Return the line, this time lady #2 (center lady) is the pivot point for both gents.
This "turn" would be better described as Lady #1 "bends-the-line" alone, gent #1 stays in place beside her. Lady and gent #2 cast outside to make a full turn until they are both facing in, lady on the right.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Polly
I find "indecent" a rather useful term. At a base level, it at least
suggests the dance is neither proper nor what dancers reflexively think of
as improper. "Improper" doesn't really describe anything either; though
dancers recognize it, and there's a giggly association with the
antiquated-notion-of-gender-segregation-as-"proper" concept, it's as much a
"code word" as any other term we use. But the association between a
particular term and position on the dance floor affords precision without
an excess of explanation; for dancers at an average level of
contra-literacy, caller says "improper", and they know where to be. Could
argue every term we use is "just a code word", doesn't make that precision
less valuable. [What the hell does "hey" describe?!]
"Reverse improper" (like "backwards becket") so lacks clarity it gives me
convulsions. If it's improper, 1s below 2s, well, that's
*progressed*improper, but dancers don't really need to know, they just
need to swing
their neighbor, and voila, progressed improper. But if a dance is reverse
progression, being clear about seems important (having experienced Jo
Mortland's "Galina" in situations where dancers *understood* the reverse
progression and others in which we were confused or unclear about it...).
And not all "indecent" dances are reverse progression.
I agree we should teach, to quote Woody, "in as few carefully-chosen words
as possible"; i agree with Michael that whether we go into detail about a
dance's progression is a case by case decision, but take issue with the
notion that which side of the set is "home" in a becket is a piece of
information that only matters when visualizing or reading choreography.
Maybe we could say, becket-CW versus becket-CCW are terms more useful to
visualizing choreography, while becket and becket-right are more useful to
dancers? I guess there's a point to be made - because i would never tell a
dancer something is "becket counterclockwise". I was mostly trying in
original post to make a point about proliferation of terms and need for
precision - iow, that *because we as callers lack a unified vocabulary for
certain less-common moves and formations, they remain rare and
automatically qualify as "challenging" with dancers because unlike more
common moves which are relatively standardized, they're a) infrequently
used b) referred to in different ways by different callers*. As opposed to
the more common "code words", like "hey" and "improper".
Here's an interesting question: do 1's still think of themselves as 1's
when a dance is becket?
Also back to the end-fx thread: teaching Chris Page's "Chain the Corner", I
once made a risque joke - "wait out at the end with your clothes off! it's
indecent, with the lady on the left" - and that's the one time dancers have
reliably remembered what i said about end effects ;]
Apologies if any of this sounded venomous; i just get frustrated when
people respond to anything but the point i was actually trying to make,
which is obviously my fault for not making the point clearly. y'all must
take with a grain of salt. Yet, in the pursuit of efficiency and precision,
some terms do give me convulsions.
~ seven of nine, tertiary adjunct of unimatrix zero one
Tavi asked, "What the hell does "hey" describe?"
Well, since you asked...
As far as we know it comes from the French "haie" or "haye" meaning "hedge".
There are two theories as to why a hedge should mean a weaving pattern:
1) hedges were made of interwoven branches - the path we follow in a hey is
the same path that a branch follows as it weaves between the other branches.
2) the term was also used to describe a line (or hedge) of soldiers lining
the route for the gentry - if you were to dance in and out of that line of
soldiers you would be following the path of a hey.
One of the earliest references we have of a hey is in Thoinot Arbeau's
Orchesographie from 1589. The Branle de la Montarde includes: Le premier
fait une haye, en passant par devant les femmes, & par derrier les hommes, &
se met a la queuhe prenant par la main la derniere femme. Roughly: The
leader then dances a hay, passing in front of the ladies and behind the men,
going to the end of the line and taking the last ladys hand.
Interestingly the very next dance in the book also has a hey, but this time
it is a hey as we know it:
Branle de la Haye: La dance de la haye que vous dictes est aultre: Elle se
dance par mesure binaire, comme la Courante Les danceurs seuls, & l'un aprez
l'aultre, premierement dancent l'air en façon de Courante, & sur la fin
s'entrelacent, & font la haye les uns parmy les aultres. Roughly: The
Branle de la Haye discussed here is different. It is danced in double
measures, like la Courante the dancers act individually, first dancing to
the tune in the fashion of la Courante, and then at the end, interlacing
themselves, they dance a hey each one between the others.
The text then describes a hey for three as we know it:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=musdi&fileName=219/musdi219.db&r
ecNum=183
So, the term is quite descriptive, but only if you know where it came from
:-)
Hope that helps!
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent