Greg said: "The term "contra dance" as an event name seems pretty
clear."
Hmmm.
What is a contra dance? Is it the American pronunciation of the French
"contre danse" which was their version of the UK English words "country
dance", and therefore encompasses all forms of traditional dance? Or
does it mean a dance where you are opposite (contrary to) someone else?
Even if you limit it to the latter, then does it have to be a longways
set for as many as will, or can it be a three, four, five, or
whatever-number couple dance?
Can it be a Sicilian Circle where the longways set is bent to avoid end
effects, but you are still opposite someone?
Historically I believe that you would often find many different
formations at an event billed as a "contra dance", varying depending on
the decade, the country, the state, the organiser, the caller, etc.
I guess most Americans who have only been to a limited number of clubs
would expect all (most of?) the dances to be:
- longways for as many as will
- first couples Improper, or Becket formation
- flowing choreography
- no-one stationary for more than 16 beats (e.g. First Couple Balance &
Swing, finish facing down to make Lines of Four)
- containing at least one swing
- 95% of the moves to be from a set of well-know moves that they know
already
Have I left anything out?
But I have been to lots of contra dance clubs where other formations
have been used, especially in England where we tend to be exposed to a
wider variety of formations and styles at a single club.
Are you allowed to do Proper dances at a "contra dance"? Or a
four-couple dance that has all the other characteristics listed above?
Or a Sicilian Circle (space allowing)?
There are many types of square dance. I use simple ones like Cumberland
Square Eight at One Night Stands, and I wouldn't call a Modern Western
Square Dance with hash calls at a contra dance. But there are many
great squares which are much closer in style to contras, using the same
figures with only a couple of new things to learn.
I suspect many of the people at contra dances have never experienced the
full richness of the tradition, and would be very positive to some
alternate formations if they were introduced carefully, and didn't
deviate significantly from their basic expectations.
So anyway, what is a contra dance? :-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk <http://www.contrafusion.co.uk/> for
Dancing in Kent
I'm stepping ever so cautiously onto a soapbox. Though I'll strive to maintain a
civil tone, my biases will certainly become clear in what follows...
Mac's original question was "I would be interesting to hear how other callers
incorporate other formations in their programs and how they and the dancer feel
about it..."
Most of the responses, mine included, spoke to what we as callers do in our
programs and why. Embedded in our answers is the reality of being hired
professionals at the mercy of the dance organizers and subject to local customs.
For example, Joy wrote: "My region is not very square-friendly, at least not at
a contra dance. ... So given the local atmosphere, I stick to mostly improper
and Becket contra dances."
The Big Question hidden behind all of our responses so far is, "To what extent
should callers select a program based on the wishes of the dancers?" Granted,
unless one meets those expectations at least in part, one will have a hard time
getting hired again. I'm well aware of that reality.
Remember the words of Polonius in Hamlet? "To thine own self be true." What does
that mean for us as callers?
Phrased differently, is the caller's role to follow the dancers or is it to
provide leadership? This might take the form of presenting a program that is
slightly different from the norm. It might mean taking a little more time to
bring out style points, or to discuss safety on the dance floor, or to
illustrate through example a particularly interesting / challenging transition,
or even in the middle of a walkthrough to remind dancers of some basics that may
never have been learned or that need refreshing-- "A ladies chain across takes
eight counts, four for the two women to cross the set and four for the courtesy
turn. The same timing applies to right and left, four to cross and four to
turn." It might mean calling more often than is the norm; several times I've
been quietly thanked by dancers who note that most callers only call a few times
and how stressful this has been for them trying to learn a dance.
I highly recommend Bruce Hamilton's little booklet, "Notes on Teaching Country
Dance," published by CDSS. Although Bruce's background is Scottish and English
country dance, much of what he says also applies in the realm of contras and
squares. In his section on "Leadership and Social Aspects," Bruce writes:
---quoted material follows:
It is crucial to understand this: people accede to your authority because that's
the shortest way for them to get to dance. Generally speaking, they do what you
say, not out of respect for your experience, because they think you know more
than they do, because you have a big voice, because it's a habit they picked up
in school, or anything like that. They do what you say out of enlightened
self-interest.
---end quoted material
He goes on to say that because the caller has been given this authority, it is
important to exercise it.
The most common example today in "our" dance community is the contras vs.
squares divide. It's important to remember that we are part of a long and
braided chain, that these two country dance forms have been in and out of favor
at different points of time. The longways dances of the late 1700s and into the
1800s were pushed aside by the quadrilles, and then both forms were abandoned on
ballroom floors and replaced by couple dances such as the polka and waltz.
Contras were, for much of the last century, appreciated in only a handful of
communities while squares were enjoyed by (literally) millions of dancers. We
get excited because 700 people are dancing contras in the main hall at NEFFA?
Modern western square dance callers remember occasions when they called to 700
squares. Callers such as Ralph Sweet who tried to interest their square dancers
in contras found a closed audience: "Contras? Boring! You do the same thing over
and over again. What's the fun of that?" And today, in this mostly
contra-centric universe, the wheel turns again as we see the rise of communities
of young dancers who are enthusiastic about southern Appalachian old-time music
and squares and want nothing to do with contras.
People like what they know. If callers only give dancers what they already know,
how will they discover the delight to be found in other dance styles? Does this
mean that an event advertised as a contra dance, one should only present a
program of polkas and tango? Scarcely. But keep in mind that an evening billed
as a "contra dance" is a new phenomenon; the first such events date back only
about 35 years, to the Boston area in the mid-1970s.
My home dance bills itself as a contra dance, but I think of it as a country
dance, and that term in my mind encompasses more than long lines. Even within
the strict contra designation, there are proper and improper dances, duple and
triple minors, and I believe that each has a valid place in a program. I
remember a dancer who started at our local dances and then, after several years,
went cautiously out into the broader world, to one of the more distant hot (or
cool) venues. She reported that she had had a great time and then added, "There
one thing I don't understand. All they did, the whole evening, was hands four
improper or Becket dances. The whole night!"
David Millstone
Lebanon, NH
I was just thinking the same thing...we could integrate lighting signals into "techno" contras to help reinforce the dance phrasing as an alternative or adjunct to the extensive vocal cueing that is often called for with this music. I'm looking forward to exploring this idea.
Brian Hamshar
-----Original Message-----
Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 11:12:34 am
To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
From: "Dorcas Hand" <handd51(a)tekkmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Firedancing/ Hooping while calling and other possible future Burning Man innovations
I've never done techno, but this lighting plan sounds well suited to some of that. So interesting.
Dorcas Hand
-----Original Message-----
From: callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net [mailto:callers-bounces@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Greg McKenzie
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 10:09 AM
To: Caller's discussion list
Subject: Re: [Callers] Firedancing/ Hooping while calling and other possible future Burning Man innovations
I can understand Jolaine's hesitation. But the "Look at ME!" part of the
caller's ego has always been a factor at contra dances. Like Jolaine I also
feel that the caller should "fade into the background" as soon as possible,
but I recognize that I am in the minority of callers and I am willing to let
others experiment. I also recognize that burning man is a unique venue with
extreme considerations for anyone attempting to call a contra dance there.
If we learn from our mistakes then those organizing the burningman contra
will learn much. I wish I could participate. I hav
I applaud Mark for all his efforts to spread contra dancing. But I have to
ask what is the purpose of firedancing/hooping while calling? I would argue
that this is an unnecessary distraction and puts the focus on the caller
instead of on the dancers. Am I supposed to watch this person
firedance/hoop while I am trying to contra dance? I hope that organizers
will ask if this "innovation" is really making the dancing more enjoyable,
or simply for the sake of being "different." My personal opinion is that
the caller should be as invisible as possible - call clearly and get out of
the way of the dancers. There are certainly callers who contribute beyond
the calls such as Beth Molero and Nils Fredland's with their wonderful
singing voices and other callers who may clog or play spoons or some other
contribution to the experience. But firedancing/hooping is a distraction
from the dance, not a contribution to it.
May Burning Man contra grow and thrive for years to come!
JoLaine
--
JoLaine Jones-Pokorney
"We are as gods and might as well get good at it!"
- Stewart Brand
A little while ago I posted a call for a replacement caller for our
contradance at Burning Man. In that post I misidentified our caller
who is planning to firedance up and down the side of the lines while
calling - it is Tracy Wilkins. In the future we might also try to
combine hooping and calling (it took a youtube search to make me aware
how amazing hooping can be).
Now that we have several replacement volunteers, I must drop off of
this list for lack of time. But I thought before I go that I would
present some of the ideas that we hope to explore many of which are
relevant to this group. I should also say that we will be looking
for adventurous experiment- friendly callers (and to generally spread
the word to dancers/callers/musicians) into the indefinite future.
There is also a nascent Western Square Dance camp at the festival (I
don't know how experimental they are going to be.)
The Vision
Beyond all the usual magical music, dancing and camaraderie, I hope
organizing this event will allow me to 'give something back' to
contradancing.
I hope first that we will attract a significant number of new young
dancers at this huge heavily under 30 festival and that this will
snowball (CA is one of the parts of the country that is graying and
needs more young dancers).
I hope we help broaden the contradancing subculture as a whole with
new moves and dance structures - see my remarks here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/burningmancontradance/message/13
I hope that we expand musical styles and technology.
I hope that our use of video (looping slomo views from the side and
from above with L and R labels of the relevant hands/ shoulders , etc)
to enhance and speed up contradance instruction is perfected and
spreads.
I hope we can come up with ('tastefully' flashing or varying) reactive
lighting that will reinforce the AABB structure of the music and give
new dancers more cues to pick up on for their timing. And maybe we
can solve the problem of finding a kind of lighting that is easy
enough for older eyes to see with, but has the magic and romance of
darker venues.
At this year’s dance we will be providing water at both ends of all
the lines – couples who are waiting out can reach up to a dangling
tube with a beer tap and direct a flow of water into their mouths (the
beer tap and nozzle will be inside a glowing silk flower so that no
one puts the nozzle in their mouth, the whole system is NSF/ approved
for potable water).
There will be new dancers drawn in by a non-traditional approach who
are then hooked and learn to love and support the long term survival
of old time/traditional contradancing.
Thanks to all those who responded. I now have enough information to
give the Sicilian lady a different answer every week and thoroughly
confuse her :-)
I sent the request to four discussion groups - I have listed them at the
bottom of the note in case anyone wants to join the other groups. Here
are the replies to the question:
Why is the formation known as a "Sicilian Circle"?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Tim Brooks:
Cos' it's a dansa you canta refusa?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Hanny Budnick:
I have no idea where I read it, but apparently the "Sicilian" circle
started out as "Caecilian" circle, named in honor of St. Caecilia, the
muse of music.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Ramsay John Martin:
I don't KNOW the answer, but I do have an hypothesis. English dances
had men on the left and ladies on the right. I was told in Sweden that
this is a custom which came from the practice of the men taking the warm
south side of cathedrals during gatherings with the women relegated to
the cold north. Thus, after marriage, and the newlyweds turned to face
the congregation, the man was on the left and the lady on the right.
Regardless of the reality of this reasoning, the English dances did have
the sexes divided.
The Spanish waltz instead had the alternate pattern-what many of us call
a Sicilian Circle formation. Several dance manuals in the last half of
the 19th century referred to that formation "as in the Spanish dance" in
contrast to the English pattern. I hypothesize that Spain and Sicily
may have seemed similar to some English dancing masters. Today we call
the "Sicilian" formation or as it had been earlier dubbed the "Spanish"
formation by the modern designation of "improper."
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Alan Winston:
I looked into this a while back; the stuff from the 1820s is my possibly
messed up version of stuff Susan de Guardiola told me about.
Executive summary:
- There's nothing Sicilian about it.
- There's nothing Circassian about it.
The "Spanish Dance" formation (duple improper) seems to indeed have come
from Spain but been adopted by English-speaking dancing masters.
Dancing master
G.M.S. Chivers turned that longways into a circle of
couples-facing-couples in the 1820s and called it a "Chiversian" circle.
[Much detail omitted here about weird variations.] That name wasn't
particularly popular. I honestly don't know whether "Sicilian" and
"Circassian" are misprisions of "Chiversian", but I haven't seen
anything from, eg, 1840 using any of those words.
So things go along from the 1820s to the 1870s and dances in that
formation (including a specific dance sequence called the Spanish Waltz,
rather than the genre of English dances of that name, which may have
been longways dances anyway).
The English dancing masters of this period liked to assign an exotic
foreign origin to the stuff they were teaching, when they weren't
proudly proclaiming themselves the inventors of it.
In the 1860s, a specific dance in that formation called "Sicilienne
Circle" was published, with the dancing master claiming that it was
formerly popular but had fallen out of favor because of bad behavior
from dancers. (That was in Hillgrove, 1865; he was an Englishman but
published in the USA, so I don't know whether he's saying it was popular
in England or in the USA.) I can't draw a clear line from that to the
formation being called "Sicilian Circle", and I have no evidence about
how popular "Le Sicilienne" was, but at some point after that - and it
might be some time in the mid-20th century, for all I know - that was
the established name for the formation.
Hope that helps!
Full Posting at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/trad-dance-callers/message/3039
What Elias Howe has to say in 1859:
SICILIAN CIRCLE (form as for Spanish dance) 100 steps
All balance, swing four hands-ladies chain-balance to partners and
turn-right and left-all forward and back, forward and cross to face the
next couple.
So note that this is Howe calling a specific dance "Sicilian Circle" and
identifying it as "form as for Spanish dance"; to Howe, "Sicilian
Circle" isn't a genre.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
English Ceilidh Discussion Group:
http://www.cix.co.uk/~net-services/ec/#bp
Callers' Discussion List
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
Traditional Dance Callers List
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/trad-dance-callers
ECD mailing list
http://www.bacds.org/mailman/listinfo/ecd
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk <http://www.contrafusion.co.uk/> for
Dancing in Kent
I have a Sicilian lady at our dances who is demanding to know why the
formation is known as a "Sicilian Circle". Can anyone help?
Thanks,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
In regards to unwelcome behavior at a dance, our community has a middle-aged
man who zeros in on the (very thin) young women (we're a college town), and
lifts them off the floor, swings them around, drops their heads towards the
floor, etc. I watched him drop a first-time dancer, TWICE in one night. I
saw her go to the restroom and followed her. She was unhurt but badly
shaken and in tears.
As a member of the organizing committee, I had a talk with him and he denied
vehemently everything I saw, saying that she "fell." I told him someone
cannot "fall" if their feet are in the air to start with. As lead, his job
is to take care of his partner. On his behalf, let me say that many of the
young women enjoy his moves, but many do not.
Because of this dancer, another local community passed a policy that
requires dancers to keep one foot on the floor at all times. I felt that
policy was a message to young people that they didn't want young people
coming to their dances as dips and aerials (done carefully and well) are how
they like to dance.
After much discussion our Board passed a policy that clearly outlines our
requirements regarding moves which lift someone off the floor, but the thing
I like best is that it outlines behavior for ALL dancers to follow. It is a
personal peeve of mine when women (and sometimes men) complain about a
dancer behind his back but will not tell the dancer what he is doing
inappropriate. That sometimes makes it hard to confront the person because
he will say, "I've never had any complaints."
Our rambunctious dancer has been following these guidelines very well for
several months now.
Here is a link to the full policy:
http://godsdance.org/GODS/New_to_Contra_files/safe%20dancing%20policy.pdf
JoLaine
Hi, As many of you know, we are contradancing at the Burning Man
festival in NV at the end of the month for the second year with a
great 3 band lineup - Lift Ticket, Noreaster and Double Apex
http://burningmancontradance.com. Our main caller is Dave Eisenstadter
with Doug McLean, Jeff Spero (who is also one of the musicians) and
Tracy Feldman (who is a beginning caller but has the advantage that
she can firedance while she calls). Our last caller was going to be
Tara Bolker but she has had to reluctantly drop out for family
reasons. Which leads me to ask - do any of you know of anyone with
calling talent who is going, has gone in the past or could perhaps be
persuaded to go to Burning Man this year (I have some extra tickets,
but no more money to subsidize).
Finally if you go to our web page, follow the 'if you want to camp
with us..." link and skim
through to the end you will find my discussion about how I hope to
keep the camp going in the future without my heavy subsidies.
Starting next
year we will have a Kickstarter campaign (check wikipedia page if
unfamiliar) and have ~$300 camp dues to cover food water and bringing
in the talent (separate from the Burning Man gate fee). There are no
guarantees we will get enough response to cover the costs but I am
hopeful. But you could say that a selling point for anyone
considering coming is that this is the last year that it is guaranteed
to happen.
Finally I would humbly suggest looking at my somewhat unusual take on
an intro- to- contra page linked from the main page.
Thanks and best wishes, Mark 352 373 3202
Sue Robishaw
Can't get through to you using Sue(a)manytracks.com as I found it on the list.
Can you send a working email address?
Thanks Much,
Jim
Austin, TX
"It's OK, I'm a Contra Dancer"