Sorry folks for leaving that detail out in "Mad Masquerade" - Becket
position, as stated, but you circle left 3 with the next couple
The dance was written in a choreography workshop at Nashville's Mad
Masquerade Dance on Nov 1, 2008.
Class also noted that it works great with a flowing Middle Eastern type
of tune.
Jane Ewing
Grant, AL
I also called this recently (for an experienced dance) with similar confusion. I did not call the roll away version. I will also call this dance again, but tighten up my teaching.
At the end of B1 tell dancers to "face their partner" (don't use the words "up and down" even though the dancers are facing up and down). FYI: At the end of B1 the women are facing their line of direction but the men are not facing their line of direction. At the end of B2 it's a little confusing for the men to face their line of direction after having just faced their partner looking up or down the opposite direction (in B1).
Pointing out "line of direction" (once or twice!) at the beginning of the walk through would be most helpful to anchor dancers at the end of B2.
The dancers I spoke with enjoyed the up/down, face across, and then up/down aspects of the dance in addition to the fact that it was a little disorienting and required them to focus.
Donna Hunt
-----Original Message-----
From: lynn ackerson <callynn1(a)pacbell.net>
To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Sent: Sat, Jan 26, 2013 2:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Callers] looking for a 4x4
Thanks for the tips, Colin.
--- On Sat, 1/26/13, Colin Hume <colin(a)colinhume.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Hume <colin(a)colinhume.com>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] looking for a 4x4
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Date: Saturday, January 26, 2013, 6:36 AM
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:02:01 -0500
> (EST), kanara(a)triton.net
> wrote:
> > Lynn, You'll find it at <http://ravitz.us/miscdances/#wu>. Please
> > post dancers' responses; it's one I've been waiting to
> call to the
> > right group.
>
> I tried "WarmUp" at the Alcester Contra last night. I
> thought it went
> well. I added the optional roll-away at the start, and
> as Cary says
> this is harder to teach - I mystified everyone and had to
> demonstrate
> it so I imagine it was my poor choice of words.
>
> I found many women overshot the half-star (some every time)
> and also
> people found the final "Face your partner and circle left
> three-quarters" disorientating for some reason.
>
> I will certainly call it again.
>
> Colin Hume
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:06:54 -0500
From: Tom Hinds <twhinds(a)earthlink.net>
I just wrote a dance and wanted to know if it's unique. I'm pretty
sure the A1 is borrowed from another dance.
D-imp
A1 Circle left. Mad Robin (face partner and do-si-do neighbor).
A2 Hey, women pass left shoulders
B1 Women pass left shoulders and swing partner
B2 Ladies chain, forward and back.
Tom
Tom - Manhattan Chowder and Mad Masquerade both start similar - the latter being most similar.
It is in Becket as follows:
A1 Cir lf 3, Mad Robin
A2 1/2 Hey, N gyp Rt 1x
B1 L Gyp Lf 1 1/2x . Half Hey (pass P Rt to start)
B2 P B&S
Jane Ewing
Grant, AL
Getting back to the original idea of new terminology for the gender role. It occurred to me that musical instruments might work. Keeping the one syllable for the male role we have bass, drum, horn, harp, bow; for the female role - fiddle, guitar, banjo, trumpet, whistle. I like the idea of the fiddle and bow, or fiddle and bass dancing together. I wonder what mischief the horn and the banjo could create :)
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 4, 2013, at 7:28 PM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
>
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:44:23 -0600
> From: Allen Ortep <ortep.allen(a)gmail.com>
> To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
> Subject: [Callers] Gender role names
> Message-ID:
> <CACsm0xNdDPqUADf_3jrKL2kvQoWuzEmufNATYdw6TgP6w+aKiQ(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Considering the intense discussion this relatively straightforward topic
> has provoked, the United States Congress' inability to reach consensus
> should not surprise anyone
>
> The first letters of the Greek alphabet are alpha, beta, gamma, delta.
> The first letters of the Hebrew alphabet are aleph, beit, gimel and dalet
>
> A pair of these should suffice. Possibilities abound
> a) alphas and betas
> b) betas (or bets) and gammas (the shortened version "bets," has a
> single syllable, just like "men")
> Those who need an explicitly analogy to the sex roles can
> imagine boys and girls
> c) beits and gimels
> d) gims (monosyllabic shortening of gimel) and dalets
> Those who need an explicitly analogy to the sex roles can
> imagine guys and dolls
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
In the "Sidelines" thread Jill wrote:
> I think everyone would agree that callers and organizers can work together
> to influence the behavior of the dancers and to set the tone for a fun and
> inclusive evening of dancing. I agree with Greg:
>
> "If anyone wants to discuss the ways callers...and others can lead, I would
> love to have such a thread."
>
I'm game. This is a core purpose of what, I think, callers do.
Jill also wrote:
> Although we might not all agree on what is acceptable dancer behavior, do
> you have more ideas for callers and organizers, perhaps a list of what has
> worked for you to make your dances more inclusive and friendly to all.
>
I think we probably *can *agree on what many *desirable *behaviors or
qualities are: Graciousness, civility, kindness, respect, gentleness,
support, confidence, etc. I suggest we focus on how to encourage what is
desirable rather than on trying to extinguish undesirable behaviors.
Kalia wrote, in reference to her newcomer orientation:
> ... I make a point of demonstrating how to ask someone to dance. A lot of
> new dancers may not have done this since high school or earlier, and it's a
> very different ball of worms at a contra dance. It can be super simple
> (offer a hand, raise the eyebrows) or you can say "would you like to
> dance?" But it doesn't have to be a big deal. That can take some
> learning, so I like to give folks a head start on that very important
> process.
>
Great point! I have seen George Marshall do this and I'm going to include
it in my own orientation sessions. Thank you for reminding me of this idea.
Maia wrote:
> "I have a challenge for you: at least once tonight, dance with someone you
> don't know; and at least once tonight, dance with someone of a different
> experience level than yourself." Something along those lines.
>
This is also very good. Here is how I do it. I try to avoid ever telling
the regulars how to behave...directly. Instead I direct my comments to the
first-timers and speak *on behalf of the regulars while assuming their full
support. *The fact is that the first-timers have no way to identify people
of a "different experience level" so any reference to that is, by
implication, directed at the regulars.
At the start of the dance evening I say: "If you are new to this kind of
dancing please find someone who has danced contras at least one night, and
form two contra dance lines."
This is a strongly implied cue to the regulars--who already know exactly
who the newcomers are--to take a leadership role and to partner with
first-timers. (Note that I do NOT tell them how to form lines. I do NOT
say "...with the lady on the right, facing the stage" or "please join at
the bottom of the line" etc. The regulars know all of this. To include
any such information would imply that I expect, at least, *some *of the
first-timers to be partnered with other first-timers. I want to imply that
*all *of the first-timers will be partnered with regulars. This is what I
mean by assuming the full support of the regulars.)
As callers we are more effective when we use our words very carefully and
judiciously. At an open, public social event eliminating excess verbiage
is always helpful in holding the attention of the hall. Implied messages
are very powerful. You can have much more influence with what you do NOT
say than with what you do say. More on this later.
- Greg McKenzie (who, having a degree in speech communication sometimes
gets a bit wonkish about it.)
I have a vague recollection that recently a group at a dance camp wrote a 4x4 (double contra, mescalonza) called something like "Warm up". If true, would someone send me a copy?
thanks,
Lynn
Thank you to everyone who has posted their ideas about how to make sure everyone is getting a chance to dance. This will be very helpful. I think it was important to have the discussions about gender balance, booking ahead, equal opportunity and whose responsibility is it to facilitate it, can we really affect people's behavior, etc. I think everyone would agree that callers and organizers can work together to influence the behavior of the dancers and to set the tone for a fun and inclusive evening of dancing. I agree with Greg:
"If anyone wants to discuss the ways callers...and others can lead, I would
love to have such a thread."
Although we might not all agree on what is acceptable dancer behavior, do you have more ideas for callers and organizers, perhaps a list of what has worked for you to make your dances more inclusive and friendly to all.
Thanks again,
Jill
I've had some success with Mike Richardson's dance "Another Jig Will Do."
It's not a waltz, but dances as one. Musically, it fits a two-part slip-jig
such as "The Snowy Path" or two parts of the three-part "The Butterfly."
See http://www.quiteapair.us/calling/acdol/dance/acd_10.html for details of
the figure.
I can generally find a waltz rhythm within the 9/8 signature, but I've seen
some dancers struggle with this, so check the tune with the band
beforehand. These same dancers were upset with me for asking them to use a
waltz step during a contra, so it might not have been the tune.
--Jerome
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, <callers-request(a)sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Re: Waltz contras - does anyone have any in their box?
--
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0858
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
For the good are always the merry,
Save by an evil chance,
And the merry love the fiddle
And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
>
> Alan Winston asked:
>
Slip-jgs are usually played with DAH-du-dum DAH-du-dum DAH-dum-dum
> (nine beats in a measure, with emphasis on the first beat of each triplet).
> Are you taking three (ONE-two-three) waltz steps per measure, or one
> (ONE...TWO...THREE) waltz step per measure?
>
Alan, three waltz steps per measure. When I danced in Louisville, the
Monday Night Band often used The Butterfly or The Snowy Path for the waltz,
and it took me a while to realize that these were not, in fact, waltzes.
And as I suggest, not all slip jigs can be felt as a waltz, as I've
painfully discovered.
The Butterfly in particular is very hypnotic as a (turning) waltz, since
the phrases seem to drive on and on rather than regathering as in most
waltzes.
But perhaps this is a regional taste.
When I discovered "Another Jig Will Do," and saw it was written for a
two-part slip jig, I asked for "The Snowy Path." I assumed people would
waltz, and in fact they did, in Louisville. Elsewhere, I've found myself
trying to explain why I'm asking them to waltz.
--Jerome
--
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0858
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
For the good are always the merry,
Save by an evil chance,
And the merry love the fiddle
And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
Or you could try to get rid of the gender disparity. For example, if you
don't have enough men then offer free entry to anyone who brings a new
man to a dance.
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent