I'd love to see more Dublin Bay dances that aren't all glossary moves
surrounding the down-hall move.
I like the concept of Erik's dance, but share the courtesy turn concern.
Personally, I find Dublin Bay in a contra dance an exercise of "why aren't
we just going down the hall?" It just feels gimmicky to me. But I enjoy the
dance Dublin Bay - so it's not a criticism on the figure, but its use.
So I like that Erik incorporated it into a means of achieving a new
choreography - the transition to a swing. That to me is cool.
So. What else we got? :)
Ron Blechner
On Jan 22, 2017 4:27 PM, "K Panton via Callers" <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
How does this dance feel in practice, Erik?
I like the notion of incorporating lesser-used figures. I like both the
chain the line - to progress the lady early and setup for a satisfying
reunion later - and the Dublin Bay.
I am troubled by two things here though. First the courtesy turn duration
will vary depending on which side of the set you are on (1/4 or 1+1/4 for
the overachiever on one side, 3/4 for the other couple).
Second is the transition you mentioned to B2.
How to get rid of chain to line of 4?
The Dublin Bay to P b&sw "might" be smoothed by the following: on the
return, after 4 steps forward, do not turn and backup. Instead, do a funky
whatever-we're-calling-a-gypsy just 1/2. I.e. all drop hands. Insides walk
around outside person 1/2 way to face P in next 4-some. Outsides kind mad
robin around the inside person 1/2 way to face P.
Meh.
On 1/19/2017 11:49 PM, Erik Hoffman via Callers wrote:
I find, when dancing the one or two dances I?ve danced that try to steal
the Dublin Bay figure, they have a line backing up bending into a
circle. I found this transition not to my taste. So I took a stab at a
different transition. I think it works, but it?s a bit tricky:
Happy Birthday, Susan
Erik Hoffman
Becket
A1 Wm ?Chain the line? (Wm Al R ?, then to next Wm, Al L ? to meet
Nb on R diag ? across from Shadow);
Neighbor Swing
A2 LLF&B; Wm Chain to Shadow
B1 Dublin Bay DH4inL ends loop back, centers step forward to
B2 Pt B&S
Given to Susan Petrick on her birthday, while on tour with the
OpporTunists in 2010 (I think).
The Dublin Bay DH4inL: Down for 4, turn alone backing up for 4,
up for 4, turn alone, backing up for 4. From the ECD dance Dublin Bay.
Others have used the Dublin Bay move, but ended it with a ?fold into a
circle. That backing up, then circling has never felt good to me. This
is my attempt to come up with a segue I like.
Note, even though it?s a Becket dance, there is a difference in
roles in this dance between the ?ones? and ?twos?.
~Erik Hoffman
Oakland, CA
_______________________________________________
, Be
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
I know several dance series use gender-free terms:
Jets/Rubies: Portland ME
Lead/Follow: Hampshire College, Contradelphia [defunct?]
Bands/Bare-arms: JP, Western MA
Larks/ Ravens: Circle Left, South Bay
Does anyone know of other dances that are gender free, and what terms they use?
Jeff
"Pivot the Line" is a good dance; I called it at our regular Madison dance
tonight, it went well. I enjoyed seeing the dancers figure out how to dance
the unfamiliar figures -- nothing was too hard, the beginners got through
it fine, and people enjoyed refining the timing for the Dublin Bay figure.
I taught it without being very precise on the timing, to give people the
joy of discovery.
It was interesting to me that practically none of the dancers pre-bent the
line for the A2. I think the 2's were enjoying the swoop across the set to
start the (figure formerly known as a) gypsy; it's more dramatic than the
usual oh-you're-here-already start of that figure.
- Roger H
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:28 PM, QuiAnn2 via Callers <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> I’ve also written a dance with this down the hall figure in it. I like to
> call it early in the evening since it’s very connected and has “rest” time
> for each couple. I haven’t run it through the Shared Weight gauntlet to see
> if anyone else has written it. Please let me know if it’s already out there.
>
> *Pivot the Line*
> by Jacqui Grennan, 5/1/2016
> Contra/Improper/Easy
>
> A1 -----------
> Four steps down the hall, turn alone, rejoin hands in lines of 4
> Four more steps down the hall, walking backwards
> Four steps up the hall, turn alone, rejoin hands in lines of 4
> Four more steps up the hall, walking backwards. Bend the line
> A2 -----------
> (16) 2’s gypsy RIGHT/swing, face up to same N’s
> B1 -----------
> (16) Same N B&Sw
> B2 -----------
> (8) 1’s DSD across set
> (8) 1’s P Sw (2’s get ready for DTH, 1’s end the swing facing down between
> new neighbors).
>
>
>
>
How does this dance feel in practice, Erik?
I like the notion of incorporating lesser-used figures. I like both the
chain the line - to progress the lady early and setup for a satisfying
reunion later - and the Dublin Bay.
I am troubled by two things here though. First the courtesy turn duration
will vary depending on which side of the set you are on (1/4 or 1+1/4 for
the overachiever on one side, 3/4 for the other couple).
Second is the transition you mentioned to B2.
How to get rid of chain to line of 4?
The Dublin Bay to P b&sw "might" be smoothed by the following: on the
return, after 4 steps forward, do not turn and backup. Instead, do a funky
whatever-we're-calling-a-gypsy just 1/2. I.e. all drop hands. Insides walk
around outside person 1/2 way to face P in next 4-some. Outsides kind mad
robin around the inside person 1/2 way to face P.
Meh.
On 1/19/2017 11:49 PM, Erik Hoffman via Callers wrote:
I find, when dancing the one or two dances I?ve danced that try to steal
the Dublin Bay figure, they have a line backing up bending into a
circle. I found this transition not to my taste. So I took a stab at a
different transition. I think it works, but it?s a bit tricky:
Happy Birthday, Susan
Erik Hoffman
Becket
A1 Wm ?Chain the line? (Wm Al R ?, then to next Wm, Al L ? to meet
Nb on R diag ? across from Shadow);
Neighbor Swing
A2 LLF&B; Wm Chain to Shadow
B1 Dublin Bay DH4inL ends loop back, centers step forward to
B2 Pt B&S
Given to Susan Petrick on her birthday, while on tour with the
OpporTunists in 2010 (I think).
The Dublin Bay DH4inL: Down for 4, turn alone backing up for 4,
up for 4, turn alone, backing up for 4. From the ECD dance Dublin Bay.
Others have used the Dublin Bay move, but ended it with a ?fold into a
circle. That backing up, then circling has never felt good to me. This
is my attempt to come up with a segue I like.
Note, even though it?s a Becket dance, there is a difference in
roles in this dance between the ?ones? and ?twos?.
~Erik Hoffman
Oakland, CA
_______________________________________________
, Be
Due to a cancellation, we are looking for a caller who can call both Contra and English dances for a weekend in Toronto on July 16/17.
Please contact me directly for more info.
Thanks
Elizabeth Szekeres
Talent(a)tcdance.org
Sent from my iPhone
I find, when dancing the one or two dances I've danced that try to steal the Dublin Bay figure, they have a line backing up bending into a circle. I found this transition not to my taste. So I took a stab at a different transition. I think it works, but it's a bit tricky:
Happy Birthday, Susan
Erik Hoffman
Becket
A1 Wm "Chain the line" (Wm Al R ¾, then to next Wm, Al L ¾ to meet Nb on R diag - across from Shadow);
Neighbor Swing
A2 LLF&B; Wm Chain to Shadow
B1 Dublin Bay DH4inL ends loop back, centers step forward to
B2 Pt B&S
Given to Susan Petrick on her birthday, while on tour with the OpporTunists in 2010 (I think).
The Dublin Bay DH4inL: Down for 4, turn alone backing up for 4, up for 4, turn alone, backing up for 4. From the ECD dance Dublin Bay. Others have used the Dublin Bay move, but ended it with a "fold into a circle. That backing up, then circling has never felt good to me. This is my attempt to come up with a segue I like.
Note, even though it's a Becket dance, there is a difference in roles in this dance between the "ones" and "twos".
~Erik Hoffman
Oakland, CA
Kalia,
In my mind's eye, lines in B1 are facing the stage at beat 12, outsides
turn to face down, insides walk forward to meet partners in beats 13-16.
That's what I picture. Erik, is that correct?
--Jerome
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0858
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
"Whatever you do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius and power
and magic in it." --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Kalia Kliban <kalia.kliban(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 1/20/2017 1:14 PM, Jerome Grisanti wrote:
>
>> Kalia,
>>
>> In Erik's dance, it appears partners are in adjacent lines of four
>> (whether women or men are in front depends on which side of the set
>> you're on, also which way the lines are turned. It also appears that the
>> first 12 beats of the Dublin Bay figure are as usual, but the last 4
>> beats are replaced by outsides turning down and insides walking up to
>> meet their partners.
>>
>
> So the line of 4 is moving forward, up toward the stage, but before they
> do the Dublin Bay flip to move backward up toward the stage
> the ends cast down?
>
> Kalia
>
Cara asked, "Is there something wrong with Lead and Follow?
Not sure if I have posted this on here before; my apologies if you read it
all before.
My beliefs, understandings, opinions - some points:
1) Contra is not intrinsically a lead/follow dance style; calling the roles
"leader" & "follower" is incorrect, misleading and generally a bad idea
2) Within Contra there are opportunities to do some lead and follow, but
either role can be the leader
3) There is a difference between leads, signals and connections, though
connections are often used to lead beginners
4) Lead & Follow works better if both dancers have good lead/follow
technique, and some flourishes also benefit from good technique
5) Leads can be with fingertips, body angles, eyes, and anything else that
works
6) The end of a ballroom-hold swing is not symmetrical and it is often much
easier to let the "man" control the end of the swing; that's not sexist, it
is physics!
7) Most dancers would benefit from good teaching on this subject, but sadly
there is very little teaching provided
Details below. Read on if you are interested...
First, I should perhaps explain my background. I have been dancing for
nearly fifty years and teaching dance for over forty years. As well as
contra, square, ECD, Contra, Morris, clog, etc. I also dance many partner
dances such as West Coast Swing, Lindy/Swing, Argentine Tango, contra waltz
and Modern Jive/LeRoc/Ceroc: http://www.modernjive.com.
Modern Jive is an English, simplified form of Swing which has no fixed
footwork and very few close-hold moves. It is led primarily by the man's
fingertips and has a very wide range of moves. I specialise in Double
Trouble: one man leading two ladies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CE6Iu6Fh6bw
This is a cabaret performance so we are doing some choreographed moves, but
most of it is being led by me and the ladies don't know what I am going to
do next. When I go to new venues I dance with lots of ladies to see how
well they follow, then I dance Double Trouble with two of the good followers
and I can lead them into a wide range of interesting moves. Leading two
strangers simultaneously only works if they are following well, and because
I have spent a lot of time studying lead and follow and developing my
leading skills so that I can do this.
So, back to Contra:
1) Contra is not intrinsically a lead/follow dance style; calling the roles
"leader" & "follower" is incorrect, misleading and generally a bad idea
I agree entirely with what many others have said already. The caller
teaches the dance. The dancers dance it to the music. Everyone knows (at
least in theory!) what is coming next, so there can be no lead or follow.
The whole point of lead and follow is that the leader chooses the next move
and has to let the follower know what it is through the lead; the follower
then has to react to that lead in whatever way they choose.
2) Within Contra there are opportunities to do some lead and follow, but
either role can be the leader
When you execute the dance as the caller called it then there is no lead or
follow. If you add some flourishes then they MAY involve some lead and
follow, but which role leads depends on the actual move.
A nice flourish at the end of "Up the Hall in Lines of Four; Bend the Line"
is for a middle person to raise their hand and turn their end person into
the circle. This is not part of the dance; the end person may not be
expecting it and has to react to it; this is lead & follow. The
genders/roles of the participants are completely irrelevant.
Note: this can also be performed by the twirlee as an independent flourish -
as long as the dancer whose hand you are holding allows it! Many dancers
are so rigid that I can't raise their arm to twirl under it! (If only
everyone would relax the muscles that they don't need to be using, and let
their hands be moved!)
3) There is a difference between leads, signals and connections, though
connections are often used to lead beginners
When you help each other to redirect your momentum that is not really lead &
follow. Examples are "Circle Left; Neighbour Dosido" or "Long Lines Go
Forward & Back with the Ladies Rolling the Men Away from Right to Left;
Ladies' Chain". Keeping connected and using the elastic in your arms to
redirect the momentum and change direction makes these really satisfying
moves. But no-one is leading or following; you are both just using good
technique to help each other execute pre-defined moves. Of course if one
dancer is experienced and the other is new to Contra, this type of
connection can be used to help the new dancer to move in the correct
direction. Connection, gestures and eyes are all great for helping everyone
achieve the dance.
Signals are pre-defined gestures that lead to choreographed moves that both
participants know. An example is the twirls at the end of a Ladies' Chain.
As a man, I offer my left hand high, fingers pointing down to let the lady
know that I am willing to help her twirl - this is a signal; she responds
with a high or low hand to let me know what she wants to happen. If she
goes high then we start the twirls and I make very small circular movements
directly above her head to help her twirl twice (or just once if she
resists). Once I have established rapport with a dancer and realised they
want to do more twirls then, on subsequent interactions, we may get up to
around seven twirls - but only if both of us have good dance technique.
Of course, a lady can lead herself into this move as well by just raising
the man's hand and hoping he doesn't resist too much!
Again this is more a signalled, playful, co-operative move than a lead and
follow, since the lady knows what is going to happen and is equally involved
in the decision about how many twirls are done.
Genuine lead & follow, where the leader leads a follower into something they
are not expecting, is quite rare in Contra.
4) Lead & Follow works better if both dancers have good lead/follow
technique, and some flourishes also benefit from good technique
Moves like Ladies' Chain twirls works best when both dancers have good
technique. The techniques for leading and following and executing good
twirls are identical to those used in Modern Jive. There is an article
about lead and follow and twirling technique at
http://www.modernjive.com/history/tension.html - you may find some useful
material there.
5) Leads can be with fingertips, body angles, eyes, and anything else that
works
When I dance Modern Jive with a beginner lady, I spend the first couple of
minutes teaching her the techniques for following; I do this through simple
moves and exercises. If she has a good sense of rhythm and good balance
then, during the second track that we dance to together, I can lead her
through fifty different moves - she doesn't need to know the moves; she
needs to know how to follow. This is lead & follow, and is very different
from what happens in a Contra dance.
The main leads are done with the fingertips, but a good leader will use
anything that works to let the follower know what they are trying to
achieve. The lead is an invitation. The follower can react in many ways to
the invitation and the two dancers can play off each other in fun ways. Of
course, always remembering that, if this is in the middle of a dance, you
need to have both players facing the right way in the right place for beat
one of the next move!
6) The end of a ballroom-hold swing is not symmetrical and it is often much
easier to let the "man" control the end of the swing; that's not sexist, it
is physics!
N.B. This is about swings where you end side-by-side with the man on the
left and the lady on the right. When you spring back to your own side at
the end of a swing then the ending is somewhat different.
A simple swing does not involve lead and follow, but someone has to control
the end of the swing. The objective is to end in the right place side by
side facing the right way.
If the lady stops when she is facing the right way then the man has already
turned too far and he is facing the wrong way; he then has to turn back
against his momentum. To avoid this the lady would have to stop the man,
get out of his embrace, and continue turning herself while making the man
stay still. This is quite hard, but good dancers often do this, especially
with beginners, or men who have no idea how to finish a swing well.
On the other hand, If the man stops the swing on around beat 6 then he just
releases the lady and her momentum takes her out smoothly to face in the
same direction as the man.
This is just physics, based on the fact that we choose to swing clockwise
and to finish with the man on the left.
This is not lead and follow; this is a mutual agreement as to how many times
to go around, and how fast, and then to let the man end the swing so that it
ends smoothly.
Good dancers of course make the end of the swing flow into the next move.
But here I am talking about a basic swing for ordinary dancers.
Of course if one of you wants to twirl or be twirled at the end of the swing
then you start moving into lead & follow territory, and since many of the
embellishments are based on moves stolen from couple dances, then most such
flourishes are led by the man. But that is not a rule - the lady can
initiate a twirl of herself or her man, or both if she has good leading
technique and he has good following technique.
7) Most dancers would benefit from good teaching on this subject, but sadly
there is very little teaching provided
As I have said, elements such as leading, following and twirling work well
if the dancers have developed good technique. But where will they learn it
in the Contra world? I teach workshops on the subject, but that seems to be
quite rare. I also occasionally teach flourishes at our regular weekly
dances. Sometimes it only needs a caller to drop in a few good one-liners
into an evening's calling to pass along a little bit of knowledge. If
callers don't do it who will?
Hmmm... I have probably rambled on for too long now. I hope some of you
find some of that useful. If you want to hear me talk on the subject for
nearly two hours please contact me about getting a cheap copy of my Toolkit
DVD: http://www.modernjive.com/tmjt.html :-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Dance genealogy question: The figure first appearing in "Dublin Bay" (aka
"We'll Wed and We'll Bed," its title in Playford) morphed in contra into a
modified "lines of four down the hall."
I know a version of it from Sue Rosen's dance "Handsome Young Maids," where
dancers facing down take four steps forwards, turn alone, and continue down
the hall with four backward steps, then repeat the figure to return up the
hall.
I'm curious how many other contras this figure, or a version of it, appears
in. Does anyone know of other dances? And any astute dance historians out
there know what the first contra to use this figure is?
Tavi