Contra Callers March 2008

contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net

32 participants
34 discussions

by Dan Black

Chris, Thanks for the fix and I hope all is well. ----- Original Message ---- From: Chris Weiler <chris.weiler(a)weirdtable.org> To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net> Sent: Sunday, March 9, 2008 1:36:45 PM Subject: Re: [Callers] Organizing Dance Cards Dan, You're right, the move is awkward for the men. If I were going to re-write the dance it might look something like this: A1 Circle left 3/4, gents roll neighbor right 1/2 hey (gents pass left) A2 … [View More]Neighbor bal. & swing B1 Long lines Gents Al. Right 3/4, new gents Al. Left 3/4 (ladies take a step to the left) B2 Partner Bal. & swing I have danced other dances with the gent's using this progression, but can't think of them right now. Maybe someone else on this list has them in their collection and would like to share? Chris Weiler Goffstown, NH Dan Black wrote: > Gang, > > By the way, Mary Kays Reel is a favorite and I enjoy changing roles in this dance ( the lady role rocks). There seems to be an awkward sequence in the B1 in the below referenced dance: > B1 Promenade (the dance originally called for a right and left through > here) > Gents allemande Right 3/4 to a fleeting long lineThe gents right hand may be behind the lady for the promenade then the gent has to reach out with his right hand for an allemande right without bopping his neighbor in the head or worse. > > Do I have this right? While walking this in my living room it seems uncomfortable, has anyone dance this sequence to confirm this? > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jerome Grisanti <jerome.grisanti(a)gmail.com> > To: callers(a)sharedweight.net > Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2008 5:16:05 PM > Subject: Re: [Callers] Organizing Dance Cards > > Susan Kevra's "The Country of Marriage" has that "Mary Cay's" move as well, > done by the men. > > http://www.io.com/~entropy/contradance/sequences/the-country-of-marriage.ht… > > Jerome > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > Callers(a)sharedweight.net > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers > > _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)sharedweight.net http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping [View Less]

17 years

Re: [Callers] Organizing Dance Cards

by Dan Black

Gang, By the way, Mary Kays Reel is a favorite and I enjoy changing roles in this dance ( the lady role rocks). There seems to be an awkward sequence in the B1 in the below referenced dance: B1 Promenade (the dance originally called for a right and left through here) Gents allemande Right 3/4 to a fleeting long lineThe gents right hand may be behind the lady for the promenade then the gent has to reach out with his right hand for an allemande right without bopping his neighbor in the head or … [View More]

17 years

Re: [Callers] thanks again for all the help with Rory O'More

by crunchymama＠juno.com

David, It helps VERY MUCH thank you! I think I was looking alphabetically under "O" for Olson instead of "J" for Jennings. DUH! Google was pulling up the right page, but I kept scrolling down too far. And thank you for the Roger Diggle version! Alison Murphy -- David.Millstone(a)valley.net (David Millstone) wrote: Dear Alison, <snip> Zesty Contras does, indeed, appear to be available from CDSS: http://www.cdss.org/sales/american_dance.html#books and scroll down to Jennings. … [View More]

17 years

Re: [Callers] thanks again for all the help with Rory O'More

by David.Millstone＠valley.net

Dear Alison, > Is the momentum from cast off proper really any different from a ladies chain into long lines forward and back? No. It's just that instead of starting across, as in a courtesty turn, with a 180 degree assisted turn, with a cast off the assisted turn starts with the actuve couple facing up and the turn is more like 270 degrees, three quarters of the way around, to end facing across. Zesty Contras does, indeed, appear to be available from CDSS: http://www.cdss.org/sales/… [View More]american_dance.html#books and scroll down to Jennings. Along with 500 dances in his unique transcription style, Larry includees many provocative essays that are in many ways even more valuable than the dances. Same thing goes for Give-and-Take, the more recent sequel which was written in part because Larry's sense of what constituted a "zesty" contra had changed over time. "Zesty Contras" actually includes dances without a partner swing-- gasp! Rory O'More balances for all in contempory contras work because they're done in two lines, one on each side of the set, rather than one line down the center. There's simply not enough room to put all the dancers into one line. (Think of normal spacing along a contra line, and now put twice as many people into it.) MORE FOR YOUR NEIGHBOR Al Olson duple improper contra A1 Circle left; allemande right neighbor 1-1/2 to a long wave A2 All balance right, then left, then slde right past your neighbor (the Rory O'More balances) For new wave, balance left, right, and slide left past that same neighbor B1 Allemande right neighbor once around (just 4 counts!), men start hey for four across the set, going 3/4 of the way B2 All swing partner; ladies chain I was on autopilot when I suggested this and credited it to Roger Diggle. It'sbecause the versin I usually call is Roger's variation of Al's dance, which Al liked even better than his original composition. MORE FOR YOUR NEIGHBOR Roger Diggle variation of dance by Al Olson Becket formation A1 Circle left 3/4, allemande right with your neighbor 1-1/2 into long waves (men facing in, women out) A2 Rory O'More balances B1 Allemande right once around, men start hey for four across the set B2 Continue the hey (until you meet partner), swing partner, slide left along the set to the next couple And if that's not enough, Al Olson also came up with... MORE FOR YOUR NEIGHBOR #2, which is published in Give-and-Take... Hope this helps... David Millstone Lebanon, NH [View Less]

17 years

thanks again for all the help with Rory O'More

by crunchymama＠juno.com

Thank you all, again, for all the help with Rory O'More. Apparently the decision on how or even whether to call it has been postponed for me by the weather- our dance for tonight was snowed out!! (My kids are thrilled, the jonquils maybe less so.) I'm not supposed to call again till April 18th, I will think on it till then, but I'm still not convinced that having all hands in for the Rory O'More line wouldn't work- can you tell stubborn runs in the family!? Is the momentum from cast off … [View More]

17 years

Re: [Callers] Rory/Rich Hart

by gtwood＠worldpath.net

"Inactives sometimes (often?) try to fill in the quieter times with additional swings. With Chorus Jig, inactives will often swing their partner while the actives walk down the outside. Then, while actives walk down the center, inactives may swing the inactive in the next set behind them, breaking the swing just in time to cast off with the active returning back down the center. Inactive indeed! - actually not at all inactive in deed..." Thanks Rich, ya got me thinking Last year a the … [View More]

17 years

Re: [Callers] need (more) help with Rory O'More

by crunchymama＠juno.com

Susan, I've replied to you offlist, but I'll reiterate for anyone else who may be passing through Memphis, Tennessee: This is the Volunteer state and we love volunteer guest callers in Memphis, and the people to contact about calling here are Joan and Ernest Kelly. Contact info may be found here on the Memphis Contra Dancers webpage: http://members.aol.com/horselovers/index.html Rich, Thank you so much for your prompt and wonderfully clear explanation of the entire sequence in A1 and of … [View More]casting off proper in particular! The entire A1 seems very clear to me now; casting off proper is kind of like a same gender courtesy turn. I think I will definitely find a group of 4 to demo it, as it seems much easier to see and imitate than explain. David, Your addendum on casting off proper, that the actives will walk forward while the inactives walk backwards/turn in place, was very helpful in cementing my ability to visualize the move. And I really appreciated how you broke everything down for me. I don't anticipate problems teaching Rory O'More slides/twirls as our dancers are very familiar with the move from other dances. But your suggestion to have the 1's end the swing facing UP solved my problem of how to get the dancers to consistently end the swing w/ lady on the left. We spend every learners lesson trying to teach people that the lady should be on the right, it's pretty ingrained here. I have a new problem however! Now that I understand the casting off, these two explanations also pointed out something I'd completely overlooked in the A1- that it is 1's/active's only in the long wavy Rory O'More line! I should have noticed this, it's right there in print, but somehow I missed it. This is very bad for me, as our dance organizer is against imbalanced dances anyway, and the Rory O'More twirls are one of her favorite moves. I thought I could slip this one by, as the origin of Rory O'More, but not if she has to be inactive for more than 16 beats at a time. And I am afraid I may be castigated for calling a dance where the 2's are completely inactive for more than 32 beats! So this brings me to a new question: Can this dance work if the inactives are included in the Rory O'More line? So at the end of A1, instead of actives only, everyone would come forward into a LWL, taking hands with their partner and a neighbor or the opposite gender. Balance, balance, and twirl, repeat, then the initial call for B1 would be something like: 1's by the right whilethe 2's back out, 1st corners alle-mande Has anyone tried it this way? I think this is what I will do, if I don't end up scrapping it all together due to nervousness or time constraints. Thank you so much for your input!! Alison Murphy "If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." ~ James Madison HTTP://WWW.RONPAUL2008.COM _____________________________________________________________ Click for free info on online masters degrees and make up to $150K/ year http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2111/fc/Ioyw6iifnHYB5oYT22mMSjcgoJzv4cU… [View Less]

17 years

Rory in Memphis

by J L Korr

Alison: I happen to agree philosophically with David M., but in practical terms your observation is accurate. From the perspective of some modern urban contra dancers, Rory O'More is almost as unbalanced a dance as you can get. The 2s' only physical participation is in the cast-off and the contra corners. David offered one suggestion for addressing this concern head-on. Here's another: Sandwich it between two dances that are extra-active or extra-energetic. If you call Rory O'More immediately … [View More]

17 years

Re: [Callers] need (more) help with Rory O'More

by David.Millstone＠valley.net

Dear Alison, --- You wrote: This is very bad for me, as our dance organizer is against imbalanced dances anyway --- end of quote --- Immediate (and intemperate) reaction: tell your dance organizer to go soak her head! This is a classic case of the hot-shots dance gypsies-- the "overactive 10%"-- demanding the the programs meet their personal preferences, rather than that of the entire community. Next reaction: Just where does your dance organizer think these dances come from? Someone just … [View More]sat down in 1985 and created a new dance form and called it contra dancing? We dance today and enjoy these dances because they have a long history behind them. Just as generations of dancers kept the dances alive for us to modify and enjoy today, so we have an obligation to keep the dances alive for future generations. (I'm up on a soapbox now, as you can tell, but there's no stopping me.) Sure, the everyone moving all the time dances are common, but keep in mind that an entire program of such dances in and of itself narrows the range of dancers who will become part of your dance community. The older dancers may not want to be moving all the time; the younger dancers (middle school, for example) may find all that constant motion confusing. Hard core dancers who've been at it for a while may have one or another physical ailment that requires them to slow down. There is NOTHING WRONG with including a dance in a program where, god forbid, some dancers stand around a little! (Okay, got that out of my system. Thanks for your patience...) More nuanced reaction: There is more to life (and to contra dancing) than dances where everyone is moving all the time. I would NOT recommend your proposed solution of having everyone in one center line-- that will just make that line unmanageable. There are plenty of modern dances-- More for Your Neighbor, for example, by Roger Diggle, comes to mind-- that have Rory O'More style balances for everyone. The usual solution is to have two long waves, one on each side of the set. You could do that and please your organizer's lust for motion. > And I am afraid I may be castigated for calling a dance where the 2's are completely inactive for more than 32 beats! I think the only way to deal with this is to face it head on, rather than to attempt to "slip it by." You might talk about how "we all enjoy dances with so-called Rory O'More balances. Here's an opportunity to dance the original, from which the figure originates." You could highlight the key supporting role that the twos play (see the final paragraph in David Smukler's article). And you might want to built into your program, later on in the evening, a more contemporary dance with the Rory O'More balances, demonstrating how this move has been revived in new contexts. I would recommend that you have folks line up in short sets (eight couples would be ideal) so that everyone gets a chance to be an active dancer. I don't know your Memphis scene, but if you have long lines, the twos are not going to be very happy. Shorter lines will let everyone experience the thrill of the ones' role. My sense is that most dancers-- "most, " but certainly not all-- will willingly try something out of the norm. If you tried to slip an entire evening of older dances by your dancers, yes, you might be "caller non grata." Even here in New England, where the chestnuts probably are called more than any other part of the country, few of us would do an entire program of older dances, unless it was specifically advertised as such, a special event featuring classic contras. And elsewhere, where the contra tradition does not have such deep roots, it may be a harder sell, but keep in mind, we're talking one dance out of an entire evening. My (more than) 2 cents David Millstone Lebanon, NH [View Less]

17 years

need help with Rory O'More

by crunchymama＠juno.com

Hi! I'm a fledgling amateur caller in Memphis TN, I've been doing this a little over a year. I just called my first dance with contra corners last week, Kathy Anderson's "Labor of Love," and it went really well, so I'm excited to be planning Rory O'More as a follow up this week. Our band is set to play a medley with the tune, and the only problem is that I don't understand the A1. I guess our group doesn't do many traditional dances, and there is no ECD here, so I'm just not able to visualize … [View More]

17 years

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Contra Callers March 2008