Thanks everyone for great ideas.
It was late when I posted my request and I should mention that this is an English/Contra crossover weekend (Princeton Country Dancers Head for the Hills).
I'm definitely looking for dances that don't fit a genre and appeal to contra dancers (ie swings and not too much inactivity). Am open to "barn" dances if there's something unusual (but not too much sashaying).
Donna
Web Site: donnahuntcaller.com
Email: dhuntdancer(a)aol.com
Cell: 215-565-6050
-----Original Message-----
From: Bree Kalb <bree(a)mindspring.com>
To: Donna Hunt <dhuntdancer(a)aol.com>; callers <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Sent: Sun, Nov 1, 2015 7:18 am
Subject: Re: [Callers] dances in unusual formations
Levi Jackson Rag is a favorite of mine but not all bands know the tune.
-----Original Message-----
From: Donna Hunt via Callers
Sent: Nov 1, 2015 12:10 AM
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: [Callers] dances in unusual formations
Hi
I'm doing a workshop on dances "outside the box" (ie, no squares or contras).
Anyone have any interesting dances for contra dancers that fit the criteria?
Any 32 bar rag will usually do J
From: Callers [mailto:callers-bounces@lists.sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Bree Kalb via Callers
Sent: 01 November 2015 12:18
To: Donna Hunt; callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] dances in unusual formations
Levi Jackson Rag is a favorite of mine but not all bands know the tune.
-----Original Message-----
From: Donna Hunt via Callers
Sent: Nov 1, 2015 12:10 AM
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: [Callers] dances in unusual formations
Hi
I'm doing a workshop on dances "outside the box" (ie, no squares or contras).
Anyone have any interesting dances for contra dancers that fit the criteria?
I second David's Triplet -- was recently posted on this list, so you should
be able to find it. Would love to see Square Line Special, though.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:00 AM Paul Wilde via Callers <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Donna,
>
> Levi Jackson Rag, for 10. Becoming a local favorite when numbers permit.
> One I really like is David's Triplet #5 by David Smuckler. (It has a hey
> for 6, or do it w/ hands to introduce a grand R & L). Nice dance.
>
> Another quirky one that is a hybrid contra/square is Square Line Special
> by Gary Roodman.
> Lots of ways to mix things up in the B part.
>
> best regards,
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
--
Jack Mitchell
Durham, NC
Jeff's Gyre & Gimble DI
A-1 1s Gyre & Gimble (R Sh)
A-2 Down Hall Line of 4, 2s Hand Cast 1's (or trn as cpl), return
B-1 Circle L 1X (all are back to orig DI)
Pass N-1 by R and Gyre N-2 by L
B-2 N-1 Gire & Gimble (R Sh)
Notes: This dance needs room, so best to keep lines short. Using the hand
cast in A-2 means you will also need space width wise. The effect in the B
part is of sweeping figure 8s along the side of the set. Tunes w/ ECD
feeling work well.
The terms will need defining for the first or second time you use them w/ a
group, but I suspect people might willingly adopt them w/ a smile. Thanks
for suggesting this. Lovely.
This dance was written in honor of Jeff Ratch, a dear friend and dancer who
left us much too soon. Jeff was able to make me howl w/ laughter quicker
than anyone I've met. It was hard to explain to people as we danced back
in at the end of a line why I was so hysterical.
Jeff, if you've been keeping tabs on us, I hope you get a huge belly laugh.
Let us continue to revel in joyfulness, gentleness, and remain respectful
of others.
Paul
PS It felt appropriate to rephrase this dance, written as a memorial, on
the cusp of Halloween & All Souls Day, esp. w/ the extra hr thrown in to
help blur the lines a little more.
If you try it, please let me know how it was received.
This is an excellent example of what I pointed out previously ... different uses of the same word in different contexts, where one may be considered derogatory and another quite the opposite. Homo, as in homosexual, appears to derive from the Greek translation meaning one in the same. However, the genus and species of humans is Homo sapien, and homo refers to a genus with several species that are closely related to humans, including Homo neandrathal. It derives from the Latin meaning mankind. When a person calls someone a homo, as in homosexual, they often mean it as deragatory. But I'm pretty sure no one would take offense to being called human. In the dance community, gypsy is not meant to be offensive, but quite the opposite is viewed as a positive term. Education of other meanings is useful, and goes both ways. It would be equally useful to educate the woman who brought this up that in our community it had a different meaning that generally means to travel.
Janet
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Read Weaver via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Date: 10/31/2015 12:09 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Gypsy
I've known at least one person who sincerely thought “homo” was a perfectly acceptable term, carrying no particular negative connotations. Whether or not she held negative views herself, she needed to learn that she was mistaken about the connotations, and if she didn’t want to be offensive, she needed to change the word she used.
Read Weaver
Jamaica Plain, MA
http://lcfd.org
> On Oct 31, 2015, at 10:37 AM, Tom Hinds via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> In my opinion the offended women actually helped spread a stereotype she didn't like. Who on this list knew that Romani women had a reputation for being (I can't remember, was it) sexual? Not me. Okay, it was the caller she complained to who put it out there, but she started it. Should the caller feel defensive or should the caller turn the issue around if it's appropriate?
>
> I REALLY, REALLY, REALLY WANT TO KNOW, who on this list believe that contra dancers have a negative view of the Romani people because of the word gypsy? Anyone?
>
> For me the more important issue is education. I learned another tidbit about the Romani people. Yes I understand how people can be sensitive, but perhaps this woman needs to learn something about us before jumping to conclusions.
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
I am looking for some EASY wholeset dancers for a Civil War event that is
mostly teenage boys. Wholesets seem to be the best option, but I am open
to othe suggestions. Virginia Reel is an obvious choice.
Peace & Thanks!
Rich
Hello all,
Linda Leslie's suggestion of gyre as a replacement for gypsy bubbled around
in my brain and a new (I think) dance percolated up. It has a twist that
isn't the gyre (which I consider just new nomenclature); women casting out
of the swing to travel from one minor set to another (similar to gent's
movement in Scoot by Tom Hinds).
I haven't gotten to test it with dancers yet, as I just finished running it
through with pegs on my desk; but I wanted to share it in support of a new
term.
A Gyre for Linda
by Luke Donforth
Contra/Becket-CCW
A1 -----------
(4) Pass through to an ocean wave (ladies left, catch right with partner)
(4) Balance the short Wavy line
(2) Walk forward
(3) Shadow gyre right 1/2
(3) Gents gyre left 1/2 in the middle
A2 -----------
(16) Neighbor gyre right and swing
B1 -----------
MEANWHILE FIGURE:
(8) Men allemande Left 1-1/2 WHILE women cast cw around whole set one
woman’s place
(8) 1/2 Hey, passing partner by right shoulder
B2 -----------
(16) Partner gyre right and swing at home
As for the other aspects that have been discussed:
I pronounce it with a softer g sound. For reasons unclear to me, gyre has
different accepted pronunciations; but (to my knowledge) gyration doesn't.
As for using the term (which I clearly support); it costs me nearly nothing
to switch and helps make the dance more accessible for some; both in
dropping a term some find offensive and making the name more descriptive of
the move. My job as a caller is to help share the joy of dancing, and if
this does that I'm in favor of it.
--
Luke Donforth
Luke.Donforth(a)gmail.com <Luke.Donev(a)gmail.com>
Pleas could you clarify how you intend to pronounce "gyre"?
I have been saying "gyre" with a hard "g" as in "give" or "gimble".
But if it is related to "gyrate" then maybe people are using a soft "g" and
making it sound like "jire".
Which do you use? Thanks.
By the way, I am still having major problems with understanding why the word
needs to be changed. "Gypsy" is not inherently bad.
Just Google, say, "gypsy pope" and you will find countless articles in
countless papers and other media (including Vatican Radio) referring to
"gypsies". Are they and the pope all racist? And that is just one example.
It is only racist if you use tone or context to make it so. But that can
apply to just about any word.
And in a dance environment it is definitely not racist.
If anyone ever asks me (and I doubt it will ever happen) I will tell them
that we call people who travel to dances "dance gypsies", just using the
word to mean someone who travels; the move likewise is just a move where you
travel around each other. No deep meaning!
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
I am NOT "progressive". It is another loaded term in my opinion. To assume most of the (silent) people on this list serv are progressive is...........probably true!
I am sensitive to people's dignity and would not intentionally offend anyone. I find the Gypsie issue troubling but do not have a solution. Create another CallerLab to standardize terms and meanings? probably not.
All that said I agree with everything George says.
I wanted to emphasize the point George makes on the terms Gents & Ladies. Those terms "print" in the hearer's ear (harder consonants). When you have music and distractions on the dance floor you can lose the "WO" of women and it can be confusing. Even in the "all position terms" these print the best on the dance floor in my experience.
Cheers! -Joe (Independent in Seattle)
On Oct 30, 2015, at 11:50 AM, George Mercer via Callers wrote:
> I am a free speech kind of guy and about as progressive as they come. Political correctness is a loaded term that I avoid at almost all costs. There is no constitutional provision to claim a right to not be offended. Neither should there be one. The world and life are just to complex and complicated for that.
>
> Having said that, I'll add that it is wise to remember that it is better to be nice than it is to be not nice; it is better to encourage people to be nice rather than not nice; it is better to create and enhance an environment where people will want to be nice and not be not nice. That's human kindness, thoughtfulness and making the world better, not politics or language manipulation.
>
> The discussion has been interesting and, for me, profitable, so I'll leave it with this. I will continue to use the "g" word as necessary while at the same time endeavoring to find good workable (for me and others) alternatives. I will continue to use "allemande" until such time as I may have to change, I prefer it to "turn," which in dancing can have a whole different and therefore confusing meaning. I liked the reference to "gents and ladies" being class-based terms. They are and, as someone who has spoken out upon hearing someone say, "He is a classy person" or "she did that with class" I have thought long and hard about the usage in contra dancing. Still I prefer them to "men and women" which for me is clumsy and on the dance floor sound very similar. While I use active and inactive on my dance cards, I rarely use them when instructing or calling, I find them even clumsier. Lead and follow are also rarely functional. So until I find something better, "Gents and ladies" it is. The terms are indeed class-based, but other words are religion-based, or ethnic-discrimination-based, even ageism-based and sexism-based. Language is kind of that way. And English is confusing and cluttered enough without making more rules. Clarity appears to me to be all important. For that matter, the same thing applies to numbering couples of neighbors #1, 2, 3, etc. They can be problematic and vaguely imply status, but for the moment they're what I've got. If you want to get into it even proper and improper can have issues. In the mean time, I'd rather dance than call -- at least until the body gives out -- so much of this is just theory for me. Lets keep working on it and discussing it as friends Thanks, George Mercer
>