Well THAT was fun.
I took a few notes, sharing per Claire Takamori's request
Sorry, didn't get there in time to hear everyone's name, and I did not include my
vociferous comments in my own notes.
Others, please edit to fill in the blanks and correct my version.
And, I apologize for monopolizing the conversation...I was so energized by the dancing
that it was difficult for me to contain my enthusiasm.
I do have follow-up questions for the group that does the Co-Host events...
What is the format? First Half Contra, Second half Swing, or is it an every other dance
sort of switching? We do Contra/English combined for special events,
and typically it is 2 and 2, alternating, but some people are not happy with this...
If it is half and half, do you experience people coming just for the half they normally dance?
Do you charge those people full price?
Regarding Attendance: Attracting/Retaining New Dancers, younger dancers, etc.
(Top concern for this meeting)
One dance group gives a free dance to members who bring a NEW dancer,
as well as the Next Time Free to the new dancer. They find it works very well.
Another group tries to have regulars all bring a friend to particular dances
when the caller is really good with teaching beginners. (NYC?)
A few? groups have had success with helping to host a free dance at local colleges.
Others have "College Night" with a deep discount when showing a Student ID.
At least One group who does the Next Dance Free thing has a tear-off where the person
gives their email or contact info at the first dance. They follow up with a personalized
email thanking them and inviting them back, possibly with details about the next dance or two.
(Who is performing...) (This may be two similar responses mashed together)
Some groups have "Taxi Dancers" with lead/follow indicators.
They are people who wear some kind of indentifier (pin, colorful marker, something)
and at sign-in the new dancers are shown what that looks like. The taxis will
dance with new folks, and be there if there are any questions.
Another group has regulars who dance with new people and try to make sure they have a partner for the next dance...
Bob: "Thank you for that dance, have you met Jean?"
Jean: "Hi, nice to meet you, would you like to dance?"
One group does a skit after the 2nd or 3rd dance about how to handle situations:
Topics: Saying no gracefully, how to stop the twirling, etc. (NYC or MontpielierContraExchange?)
Money stuff:
{Seems Rochester is an outlier, with regard to the cash box being unattended all evening, and self-serve sign-in.}
More than a couple groups have found that a Sliding Scale payment makes more money than a fixed rate.
The most successful seem to communicate the cost of running the dance. Something like:
Your money pays for Band/Caller/Rent/Insurance...and if we get 60 dancers paying $10 each,
we will break even...(Fill in the correct numbers).
One contra group works with Swing N Blues groups in their viscinity to co-host events.
{I view this very similar to what we are doing with English/Contra half and half dances.
Not sure of their format for an evening...}
Take the top exec of the local PBS radio station to lunch and talk about your dance.
They will become your advocate. (Probably works better in smaller New England towns)
Volunteers:
Everyone is aging or burning out.
Have to get people started with small jobs with distinct short term objectives.
(Fill water jugs, sweep floor, put away chairs, etc.)
Extend PERSONAL Invite to be part of organizing team.
Volunteer requests over mic go in one ear and out t'other.
Misc.
Good idea to get a coach for the Open Band.
Learned a new term: Ambi-dance-terous
Bob
(Rochester NY Weekly Thursday Contra)
I’m not going to Flurry this year…. Would you be willing to post some notes/ideas from the meeting here?
Claire Takemori (Campbell CA)
On Feb 16, 2017, at 1:09 PM, via Organizers <organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Send Organizers mailing list submissions to
organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
organizers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
organizers-owner(a)lists.sharedweight.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Organizers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Organizers discussion session at the Dance Flurry this
weekend! (Emily Addison via Organizers)
2. Re: Organizers discussion session at the Dance Flurry this
weekend! (Donna Hunt via Organizers)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:43:48 -0500
From: Emily Addison via Organizers <organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
To: Shared Weight Organizers <organizers(a)sharedweight.net>
Subject: [Organizers] Organizers discussion session at the Dance
Flurry this weekend!
Message-ID:
<CAD7WKUXhS5jPc_CGX-P1z7uhrkWwY4GzEwY7yyTCWi7u_WdvVg(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Fellow Organizers,
Heads up if you're going to the Dance Flurry in Saratoga Springs NY this
weekend and want to talk dance organizing...
Sunday from 11:15-12:15 there will be a dance organizers discussion session
in Hilton Broadway 4.
The goal of the workshop is for organizers to share and gather as many
great ideas as possible regarding topics of interest to them... these may
be concerns or challenges or simply things folks want to learn about.
We'll work quickly to identify a handful of the most common topics and then
get right into organizers sharing their best ideas and brainstorming on the
challenges/topics. One hour isn't much time but we can get lots done!
Looking forward to seeing a few of you :)
Emily Addison
Ottawa ON
Hi Fellow Organizers,
Heads up if you're going to the Dance Flurry in Saratoga Springs NY this
weekend and want to talk dance organizing...
Sunday from 11:15-12:15 there will be a dance organizers discussion session
in Hilton Broadway 4.
The goal of the workshop is for organizers to share and gather as many
great ideas as possible regarding topics of interest to them... these may
be concerns or challenges or simply things folks want to learn about.
We'll work quickly to identify a handful of the most common topics and then
get right into organizers sharing their best ideas and brainstorming on the
challenges/topics. One hour isn't much time but we can get lots done!
Looking forward to seeing a few of you :)
Emily Addison
Ottawa ON
I'm interested in how other groups handle in-dance organizational tasks -
collecting admissions, putting out refreshments, sound and perhaps checking
shoes at the door. Do you use volunteers? Pay people? If volunteers, do you
have a structured corps of volunteers you rely on or just ask for
volunteers as needed? It would be very helpful if you mentioned how
frequently you have dances, and roughly how many attend your dances.
We (Country Dance New York) have a pretty formal system, and put on roughly
80 dances a year (weekly Tuesday and Saturday 9.5 months a year), getting
roughly 40-50 for English and 60 plus for contra. Some people volunteer for
only one or a few dances, but a lot of the work is done by "full-time
volunteers," who do at least 8 tasks during the fall and/or spring. In
exchange for this they get in free to every event. The tasks are also
pretty structured - only members can work the door in order to increase
security of funds, and attendance is kept on an iPad using Square so there
is some training involved; refreshments involve buying food, refilling
water pitchers and putting out a number of different things to eat at the
break, then washing dishes and cleaning up. Volunteer coordinators line up
people for each task in advance. In general this works very well - tasks
get done, and volunteers who are short on cash can get in free. The
downside, in my view, relates to our feeling dependent on the system and
thus reluctant to consider other options for fear we would lose our
volunteers. In particular, some have suggested that it would be more fair
to lower our admission rate for those most likely to be in need (students
in particular), or to go to a "pay what you can" system of some sort. The
reports I've read suggest that "pay what you can" usually works out well,
with perhaps increased attendance and no loss of income. However, we can't
do that because if people could get in by paying what they can the
incentive to be a volunteer would vanish and we are afraid we would not be
able to get things done (or a very small group would have to do them, and
burn out since we have so many dances). However, I have heard rumors that
other dances don't have such a structured volunteer system and still manage
to get these in-dance tasks done. I would love to hear how you manage
getting tasks done with volunteers, especially if you have a "pay what you
can" or very reduced rate for those in need.
Thanks!
David
Hi David, Dugan, and others :)
Dugan - great to see your sheets! Thanks for sharing.
David - great question. We run a very similar system to you in terms of
'formality' although we do have people help out with tear down randomly.
However, only three people get in free: Floor manager (responsible for the
evening) and two set up/tear down volunteers. The people who bring the
snacks, look after 'shoe police' (weird term!), and all the door volunteers
still pay. We do this as we have approx 10 volunteers a night and can't
afford to loose their $10-12.
We have a good pool of volunteers and get all the slots filled, however we
only have three dances a month.
Membership may help with that --- feeling of belonging, ownership,
commitment to the community.
We also promote it as a great way to get to know people.
Here's our semi-outdated roles for the volunteers:
http://ottawacontra.ca/view/?volunteer
Emily Addison
Ottawa Contra
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:08 PM, via Organizers <
organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Send Organizers mailing list submissions to
> organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-
> sharedweight.net
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> organizers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> organizers-owner(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Organizers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Volunteers (Dugan Murphy via Organizers)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:23:50 -0400
> From: Dugan Murphy via Organizers <organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> To: organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Subject: Re: [Organizers] Volunteers
> Message-ID:
> <CAAwnfF5DOWrcyZam61KmykjAOxGWLCpn2x=oKh8qbdFjwX6zXg@mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi, David,
>
> I run a weekly (49 dances per year minus weather cancellations) Thursday
> night contra series in Portland, Maine. We started in June and we've had
> about 70-100 dancers each week since then.
>
> Our in-dance volunteer structure is largely based on Will Loving's
> structure for the weekly contra series in Amherst, Massachusetts. We have
> five volunteer positions at each dance: setup/breakdown (shows up an hour
> before the beginner lesson and stays 30 minutes after the last waltz to
> arrange and breakdown signage, tables, fans, sound baffling blankets, etc),
> 3 greeters for the door (one hour each), and one dance manager (makes sure
> the performers and all the other volunteers have what they need, counts the
> money, pays the band, etc). Each of these volunteers is offered free
> admission in exchange for their service.
>
> Because so much of the value that our in-dance volunteers bring is that we
> can rely on them showing up, they are only offered free admission if they
> sign up ahead of the dance. Some dancers help out anyway, which is a
> bonus. We tell those dancers that if they want to get in free next time,
> they can get in touch about a volunteer slot.
>
> We keep track of dancers who offer to volunteer so we can make these
> arrangements. When new people express interest, we add them to the list.
>
> Our dancers have have expressed appreciation for the training documents we
> offer them in advance of their service so it is very clear what they are
> and are not responsible for. These documents are also largely based on
> similar materials used in Amherst.
>
> Here's our guide for greeters:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CkWK5swVLJejYfUdcDwMeJHUzjKCd
> YPtD4YB5cSxtv0/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Here's our nightly checklist, which includes actions by setup/breakdown
> volunteer, dance manager, and greeters:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m1HNwV2pzx0n6qqoueuD4KQlhXYSV
> Vneez538_H0mhw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> As our series matures, I am finding it easier to recruit volunteers at the
> same time that it is becoming more common that dancers help out without
> being asked. Though it is becoming more common that dancers show up early
> and stay late to help without being asked and though it is becoming easier
> to recruit a greeter on the fly when someone doesn't show up, I really
> appreciate having volunteers for each evening worked out in advance.
>
> I'm thinking about your concern, David, of removing the financial incentive
> to volunteer by changing to a pay-what-you-can system. Keep in mind that
> financial incentive likely is not the motivation for dancers to volunteer.
> Most of them likely also carry some degree of responsibility to help the
> series prosper. Many also likely appreciate the opportunity for extra
> socializing. Those benefits of volunteerism won't go away with a
> pay-what-you-can system.
>
> Dugan Murphy
> Portland, Maine
>
> dugan at duganmurphy.com
> www.DuganMurphy.com
> www.PortlandIntownContraDance.com
> www.NufSed.consulting
>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:46:21 -0500
> From: David Chandler via Organizers
> Subject: [Organizers] Volunteers
>
> I'm interested in how other groups handle in-dance organizational tasks -
> collecting admissions, putting out refreshments, sound and perhaps checking
> shoes at the door. Do you use volunteers? Pay people? If volunteers, do you
> have a structured corps of volunteers you rely on or just ask for
> volunteers as needed? It would be very helpful if you mentioned how
> frequently you have dances, and roughly how many attend your dances.
>
> We (Country Dance New York) have a pretty formal system, and put on roughly
> 80 dances a year (weekly Tuesday and Saturday 9.5 months a year), getting
> roughly 40-50 for English and 60 plus for contra. Some people volunteer for
> only one or a few dances, but a lot of the work is done by "full-time
> volunteers," who do at least 8 tasks during the fall and/or spring. In
> exchange for this they get in free to every event. The tasks are also
> pretty structured - only members can work the door in order to increase
> security of funds, and attendance is kept on an iPad using Square so there
> is some training involved; refreshments involve buying food, refilling
> water pitchers and putting out a number of different things to eat at the
> break, then washing dishes and cleaning up. Volunteer coordinators line up
> people for each task in advance. In general this works very well - tasks
> get done, and volunteers who are short on cash can get in free. The
> downside, in my view, relates to our feeling dependent on the system and
> thus reluctant to consider other options for fear we would lose our
> volunteers. In particular, some have suggested that it would be more fair
> to lower our admission rate for those most likely to be in need (students
> in particular), or to go to a "pay what you can" system of some sort. The
> reports I've read suggest that "pay what you can" usually works out well,
> with perhaps increased attendance and no loss of income. However, we can't
> do that because if people could get in by paying what they can the
> incentive to be a volunteer would vanish and we are afraid we would not be
> able to get things done (or a very small group would have to do them, and
> burn out since we have so many dances). However, I have heard rumors that
> other dances don't have such a structured volunteer system and still manage
> to get these in-dance tasks done. I would love to hear how you manage
> getting tasks done with volunteers, especially if you have a "pay what you
> can" or very reduced rate for those in need.
>
> Thanks!
>
> David
>
Hi, David,
I run a weekly (49 dances per year minus weather cancellations) Thursday
night contra series in Portland, Maine. We started in June and we've had
about 70-100 dancers each week since then.
Our in-dance volunteer structure is largely based on Will Loving's
structure for the weekly contra series in Amherst, Massachusetts. We have
five volunteer positions at each dance: setup/breakdown (shows up an hour
before the beginner lesson and stays 30 minutes after the last waltz to
arrange and breakdown signage, tables, fans, sound baffling blankets, etc),
3 greeters for the door (one hour each), and one dance manager (makes sure
the performers and all the other volunteers have what they need, counts the
money, pays the band, etc). Each of these volunteers is offered free
admission in exchange for their service.
Because so much of the value that our in-dance volunteers bring is that we
can rely on them showing up, they are only offered free admission if they
sign up ahead of the dance. Some dancers help out anyway, which is a
bonus. We tell those dancers that if they want to get in free next time,
they can get in touch about a volunteer slot.
We keep track of dancers who offer to volunteer so we can make these
arrangements. When new people express interest, we add them to the list.
Our dancers have have expressed appreciation for the training documents we
offer them in advance of their service so it is very clear what they are
and are not responsible for. These documents are also largely based on
similar materials used in Amherst.
Here's our guide for greeters:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CkWK5swVLJejYfUdcDwMeJHUzjKCdYPtD4YB5cS…
Here's our nightly checklist, which includes actions by setup/breakdown
volunteer, dance manager, and greeters:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m1HNwV2pzx0n6qqoueuD4KQlhXYSVVneez538_H…
As our series matures, I am finding it easier to recruit volunteers at the
same time that it is becoming more common that dancers help out without
being asked. Though it is becoming more common that dancers show up early
and stay late to help without being asked and though it is becoming easier
to recruit a greeter on the fly when someone doesn't show up, I really
appreciate having volunteers for each evening worked out in advance.
I'm thinking about your concern, David, of removing the financial incentive
to volunteer by changing to a pay-what-you-can system. Keep in mind that
financial incentive likely is not the motivation for dancers to volunteer.
Most of them likely also carry some degree of responsibility to help the
series prosper. Many also likely appreciate the opportunity for extra
socializing. Those benefits of volunteerism won't go away with a
pay-what-you-can system.
Dugan Murphy
Portland, Maine
dugan at duganmurphy.comwww.DuganMurphy.comwww.PortlandIntownContraDance.comwww.NufSed.consulting
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:46:21 -0500
From: David Chandler via Organizers
Subject: [Organizers] Volunteers
I'm interested in how other groups handle in-dance organizational tasks -
collecting admissions, putting out refreshments, sound and perhaps checking
shoes at the door. Do you use volunteers? Pay people? If volunteers, do you
have a structured corps of volunteers you rely on or just ask for
volunteers as needed? It would be very helpful if you mentioned how
frequently you have dances, and roughly how many attend your dances.
We (Country Dance New York) have a pretty formal system, and put on roughly
80 dances a year (weekly Tuesday and Saturday 9.5 months a year), getting
roughly 40-50 for English and 60 plus for contra. Some people volunteer for
only one or a few dances, but a lot of the work is done by "full-time
volunteers," who do at least 8 tasks during the fall and/or spring. In
exchange for this they get in free to every event. The tasks are also
pretty structured - only members can work the door in order to increase
security of funds, and attendance is kept on an iPad using Square so there
is some training involved; refreshments involve buying food, refilling
water pitchers and putting out a number of different things to eat at the
break, then washing dishes and cleaning up. Volunteer coordinators line up
people for each task in advance. In general this works very well - tasks
get done, and volunteers who are short on cash can get in free. The
downside, in my view, relates to our feeling dependent on the system and
thus reluctant to consider other options for fear we would lose our
volunteers. In particular, some have suggested that it would be more fair
to lower our admission rate for those most likely to be in need (students
in particular), or to go to a "pay what you can" system of some sort. The
reports I've read suggest that "pay what you can" usually works out well,
with perhaps increased attendance and no loss of income. However, we can't
do that because if people could get in by paying what they can the
incentive to be a volunteer would vanish and we are afraid we would not be
able to get things done (or a very small group would have to do them, and
burn out since we have so many dances). However, I have heard rumors that
other dances don't have such a structured volunteer system and still manage
to get these in-dance tasks done. I would love to hear how you manage
getting tasks done with volunteers, especially if you have a "pay what you
can" or very reduced rate for those in need.
Thanks!
David
Hi Mac,
Thanks for the thoughts.
We are looking at why attendance is down and at ways to increase attendance.
Re communicating what talent pays... not trying to hide that at all. We've
just never communicated that. I think it's mostly because as a whole, our
committee didn't think there was a reason. And there are likely a few who
might still feel a little uncomfortable. (I'll have to ask.)
I'm all for it, it's more how people do that communication so it's as
effective and positive as possible.
:) Emily
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, via Organizers <
organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Send Organizers mailing list submissions to
> organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-
> sharedweight.net
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> organizers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> organizers-owner(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Organizers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Dance pricing, communicating about pricing and more
> (Emily Addison via Organizers)
> 2. Fw: Dance pricing, communicating about pricing and more
> (Mac Mckeever via Organizers)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 15:42:35 -0500
> From: Emily Addison via Organizers <organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> To: Shared Weight Organizers <organizers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Subject: [Organizers] Dance pricing, communicating about pricing and
> more
> Message-ID:
> <CAD7WKUX+dADRd4-8Nc=qj+t9Y-cSg5vzfwg+uiDq0nwG0JRLvA@mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi fellow organizers,
>
> Following up from some discussion in December about low attendance, here in
> Ottawa we're working on 'recovering' from a surprising attendance drop this
> year. We're having a major strategy session later in the month which
> includes talking publicity, programming, finances etc.
>
> I'd love to hear about any ****innovative ideas you have for door
> pricing****
>
> Our current system:
> $12 regular, $10 members and students, 16 and under free
> Membership is $30 start of year, $20 in January. People who want to be
> generous and buy a sustaining membership can pay $50.
>
> Possible options currently on the table:
> The easiest solution which would be the default is to raise the price for
> all by $2 which some feel is a fair price compared to a movie. However,
> others think paying $12-$14 every two weeks will be not only hard on those
> with low incomes but also a psychological be a turn off for others.
>
> Ideas I'm wondering about:
>
> - $10/12 base, adding sliding scale up to $15... hopeful that people
> would contribute more.
> - Also communicating effectively (we don't do this at all now) on the
> cost of running a dance. This would mean exposing what the average
> cost of
> talent and sound but I think if people knew where money was going and
> how
> little talent actually get paid for their efforts, they'd be more
> generous.
>
> Your ideas??????
> Any thoughts on the ideas above and in particular, anyone doing a great job
> of communicating costs to their dancers?
> Any other brilliant thoughts? Maybe different donor levels? Donation jars
> (but how to do well)?
> Other?
>
> With much thanks!
> Emily Addison in Ottawa
>
Here's what we've done with our dance. It was a calculated risk/leap of
faith. We gave notice verbally by announcements at the dance for a few
weeks before it started, plus email and Facebook notices. Facebook comments
were very positive and several folks said this would make the dance
available to them once more.
http://mondaycontras.com/pages/you-pick-admission.php
Attendance is up so far vs. prior periods and pay for performers is up
significantly, on average. Limited sample to date - we began just this
calendar year. Anecdotally approximately 60% pay the suggested amount, 30%
pay the higher figure and 10% or fewer lower. We don't turn away people at
any amount (anything over cost is gravy). Some people are also giving us
donations when they have it - with the knowledge it is all going to the
talent. We're a unique dance - running 45-90 people weekly - a sort of
weekly-community dance hybrid, where folks value the connection and are
invested in keeping it going.
This approach makes the door sitter job pretty easy/finite and we're
getting better statistics than before (I'll share a later post on how
that's been achieved - once I find some time to write it up).
-Don
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Emily Addison via Organizers <
organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Hi fellow organizers,
>
> Following up from some discussion in December about low attendance, here
> in Ottawa we're working on 'recovering' from a surprising attendance drop
> this year. We're having a major strategy session later in the month which
> includes talking publicity, programming, finances etc.
>
> I'd love to hear about any ****innovative ideas you have for door
> pricing****
>
> Our current system:
> $12 regular, $10 members and students, 16 and under free
> Membership is $30 start of year, $20 in January. People who want to be
> generous and buy a sustaining membership can pay $50.
>
> Possible options currently on the table:
> The easiest solution which would be the default is to raise the price for
> all by $2 which some feel is a fair price compared to a movie. However,
> others think paying $12-$14 every two weeks will be not only hard on those
> with low incomes but also a psychological be a turn off for others.
>
> Ideas I'm wondering about:
>
> - $10/12 base, adding sliding scale up to $15... hopeful that people
> would contribute more.
> - Also communicating effectively (we don't do this at all now) on the
> cost of running a dance. This would mean exposing what the average cost of
> talent and sound but I think if people knew where money was going and how
> little talent actually get paid for their efforts, they'd be more generous.
>
> Your ideas??????
> Any thoughts on the ideas above and in particular, anyone doing a great
> job of communicating costs to their dancers?
> Any other brilliant thoughts? Maybe different donor levels? Donation jars
> (but how to do well)?
> Other?
>
> With much thanks!
> Emily Addison in Ottawa
>
> _______________________________________________
> Organizers mailing list
> Organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net
>
>
This might be a crazy idea, Emily, but the by-donation pay model works
wonders in many different areas, in particular, here in Winnipeg, and could
work for social gatherings as well. For those of you who may not know,
"by-donation" means being admitted, receiving a product, or getting
whatever you normally get for an established cost, for the cost of any
amount of money the patron chooses. It works extremely well in fundraisers
utilized by students. I have heard that makes way more money than with
itemized cost-list bake-sales. It works extremely well in community shops
around the city, for learning how to fix your bike.
The only other detail that tends to vary from model to model is the
accompanying list of so-called "suggested donations". This is a list of
what the organization might hope you to donate for a particular items, and
is usually given as a range, with, of course, the option to get the item
for free or for whatever pocket change you happen to have on at the time
still on the table. This *could *take the form of a list of expenses your
business incurs for the night, or an average donations that you think would
suffice if everyone paid it, or a mathematical equation which brings it all
together with an estimation of how many people are going to show up. It *could
*take the form different amounts depending on who you are, like 0-12 years
old: $0-1; 12-17 year old: $1-5; etc. etc., or how you have arrived, like
with partner, with costume, with family, with new dancer friends, etc. It
also should be obvious where the money is going, like to the musicians, or
back into the organization, etc.
The shift here is less about money and more about psychology. Lots of
different theories out there, but for me, it's about autonomy, feeling
included and feeling important, filling a need, etc. rather than just being
a paying customer to fill the seats. After all... how can patrons not feel
like a cog when organizers and producers go on and on about "getting people
out". The focus there is about all the people that aren't there, rather
than being grateful for the people that ARE there. It will give you so much
more of a reason to say "Thank you" to people at the end of the night, and
really mean it.
I will be implementing this cost structure for a dance on March 31st here
in Winnipeg. I'll keep you updated, if you wish.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:08 PM, via Organizers <
organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Send Organizers mailing list submissions to
> organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-
> sharedweight.net
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> organizers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> organizers-owner(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Organizers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Dance pricing, communicating about pricing and more
> (Emily Addison via Organizers)
> 2. Fw: Dance pricing, communicating about pricing and more
> (Mac Mckeever via Organizers)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 15:42:35 -0500
> From: Emily Addison via Organizers <organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> To: Shared Weight Organizers <organizers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Subject: [Organizers] Dance pricing, communicating about pricing and
> more
> Message-ID:
> <CAD7WKUX+dADRd4-8Nc=qj+t9Y-cSg5vzfwg+uiDq0nwG0JRLvA@mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi fellow organizers,
>
> Following up from some discussion in December about low attendance, here in
> Ottawa we're working on 'recovering' from a surprising attendance drop this
> year. We're having a major strategy session later in the month which
> includes talking publicity, programming, finances etc.
>
> I'd love to hear about any ****innovative ideas you have for door
> pricing****
>
> Our current system:
> $12 regular, $10 members and students, 16 and under free
> Membership is $30 start of year, $20 in January. People who want to be
> generous and buy a sustaining membership can pay $50.
>
> Possible options currently on the table:
> The easiest solution which would be the default is to raise the price for
> all by $2 which some feel is a fair price compared to a movie. However,
> others think paying $12-$14 every two weeks will be not only hard on those
> with low incomes but also a psychological be a turn off for others.
>
> Ideas I'm wondering about:
>
> - $10/12 base, adding sliding scale up to $15... hopeful that people
> would contribute more.
> - Also communicating effectively (we don't do this at all now) on the
> cost of running a dance. This would mean exposing what the average
> cost of
> talent and sound but I think if people knew where money was going and
> how
> little talent actually get paid for their efforts, they'd be more
> generous.
>
> Your ideas??????
> Any thoughts on the ideas above and in particular, anyone doing a great job
> of communicating costs to their dancers?
> Any other brilliant thoughts? Maybe different donor levels? Donation jars
> (but how to do well)?
> Other?
>
> With much thanks!
> Emily Addison in Ottawa
>