New subject: [Organizers] Organizers Digest, Vol 6, Issue 7

31 Jan 2008

Hello all,

I'm beginning to have regrets.  When I suggested that Chris copy those threads from
the callers list, I did so because I found them inspiring accounts of ways that people
creatively solved what might have been seen as 'bad' situations that had potential
to damage the long-term health of our dearly loved social activity, and turned them into
true community-building experiences, often making life a bit brighter for all concerned. 
This seemed a great thread to continue on our list -- I was looking forward to learning
from ways that organizers have done those same things - turned icky situations into better
ones...  how organizers have taken a difficult situation at their series and helped
improve it for the good of all concerned.

In the course of my dancing, calling and organizing life, I have witnessed many examples
of unpleasant situations, including ones with certain dancers in the community.  (We can
all name innumerable dancer evils, as evidenced by the previous posts -- including,
hot-shot, self-absorbed, flirt-meister, black&decker twirlers, never-on-time, clumsy,
unnecessarily directive...  I might also add limp noodles, deadweight women,
carpal-tunnel-inducing allemanders, take up 6x your allotted spacers, stalkers, needs a
shower, your-perfume-makes-it-hard-to-breathe, sweat factories, middleaged males who are
borderline perverts that only dance with young girls... really, the list of outrages can
go on and on and on...)  I have begun to believe that there is no way of really removing
all of these "undesireable" (to some or many) people from our community.  It
seems that when one disappears, two more appear who are new variations on the theme.  (And
anyhow, can we really endorse that sort of 'cleansing' to make our dance floor
full of perfect dancers?  I doubt it.)  I have also begun to realize that I could spend
countless hours railing about the outrages of horrible dancers, but that if I take the
time to stop complaining, there probably are a few things that I could do to make the
situation better.  This is why I like that thread.  It was a helpful reminder of ways to
take positive action.

I agree with those who have pointed out in other threads that it is not the job of the
organizers (or the caller for that matter) to ensure that you or I  or everyone has a peak
experience for every minute of the evening.  Likewise, I don't believe it's the
job of organizers or caller to police the dance hall, to reprimand people for perpetuating
any of the above evils, and so forth.  But there are certainly things we can do to make
the contra world a nicer place to inhabit.

At the Ralph Page Dance Legacy Weekend earlier this month, a friend repeated an
observation from a workshop they'd attended.  Apparently David Millstone reminded the
group that a caller is not only a programmer, music requester, teacher and prompter - a
caller is a leader.  A leader.  And as such, when they exhibit qualities of leadership,
they have the capacity to bring a dance community to places they might not have gone on
their own.  This is is what I noticed in the original posts about dealing with
'bad' dancers.  They were demonstrating leadership.

The stream of posts about 'bad' dancers has reminded me of people in my dance
community here.  At our local dance, we have:
- a dancer who is truly "odd".  He looks like a nutty professor, has extremely
atypical ways of interacting socially, is fairly uncoordinated, chronically confused,
often late... and... he is utterly happy to have found contradancing.  
- pre-teens who partner with their same-gender friends, who for months were complete
trainwrecks in the sets they chose, but were having a blast, wearing out the tracks on the
dance music cds they begged their parents to buy, and were choosing to participate in an
activity with people mostly 3-4x their age.
- people whose physical ailments simply keep them from executing certain figures at all,
let alone correctly and on time with excellent flourishes but who smile broadly for the
entire 3 hours.

And when I think about the larger dance community, I think of dozens and dozens of people
who quite frankly don't fit into society's norms, but who have found a place in
our dance community.  Do we really think we have to root out all of the imperfections?

At the same Ralph Page weekend in NH, during Nils Fredland's workshop, we considered
the question "Why do we dance?"  One response that caught my attention was the
observation that contradances are a community which is tolerant.  Tolerant of difference. 
What a great thing.  We could use a bit more of that in the larger world.  Intolerance is
creating quite a lot of damage, we could give tolerance a try.  Tolerance. 

This is partly what I noticed about those original posts.  They were examples of ways that
a particular community tolerated an imperfect dancer, and in fact, made it better for all.
 It wasn't endorsing a particular problematic behavior or attitude, but tolerating it.
 They took an indirect approach -- instead of meeting the 'problem' head on, they
figured out ways to fix the situation so that the 'problem' wasn't causing
quite so many other problems.  They were making the situation itself more tolerable for
all.  

I'm not talking about ignoring flat out unsafe behavior.  When a herd of 8 year old
kids was playing tag on the dance floor, racing pell mell through the lines of dancers,
you can bet that I wasted no time in chasing them down to tell them, "Uh-uh.  No way.
 You need to stop.  This is a dance.  If you want to play tag, talk to your parents about
going outdoors.  But this is a place to dance, to enjoy the music and to sit and talk with
friends."  

When I see certain young and enthusiastic young men out there who I think are endangering
the arm sockets of less strong-willed partners than I, it occurs to me that I have a few
options.  I could tell them they're not welcome at my dance, I could sternly lecture
them about how they will cause countless women pain and suffering and rotator cuff
surgery, or I could make sure that I, and others like me, cheerfully ask them to dance at
least once in a night, knowing that I have the dance skills to protect myself and with the
hope that I can help them see the delights of mutuality and consideration in a dance
partner.  

My impulse is to lecture, and to avoid them like the plague on the dance floor, but I
suspect that's not what will make the situation more tolerable for all.  (And besides,
it's partly because I'm a strong-willed partner that I feel endangered -- I resist
their lead rather than going with the flow.)

Sigh.

Anyone teach ethics?  This is like questions of morality.  Greatest good for the greatest
number?  Absolute moral code?  Shades of grey?

Yours with furrowed brow,
Chrissy Fowler

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.belfastflyingshoes.org 

_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan

Re: [Organizers] Organizers Digest, Vol 6, Issue 7