I'll chime in here. My group in Dallas is a 501(c)3
non-profit. We have an elected board; coercion and
begging were the means that some of us got onto the
board, but a fair amount of people who get on, seem to
be willing to stay on, in changed capacities
sometimes. We have a lot of people, IMO, who really
care about our dance; we have a few that were the
founders of the dance, still around, who may or may
not be on the board, but are still willing to do quite
a bit of work. For instance, the person who does the
scheduling has been around a long time, and does not
currently serve on the board, but is willing to do the
scheduling of callers and bands. She interfaces with
the board from time to time, but does not attend
meetings unless we specifically request it. We have a
Special Events committee that includes two previous
board members, who do not attend board meetings.
People seem to do what they're interested in--and
people who have previously been coerced or begged to
be on the board, have continued their involvement.
We have also had co-presidents and co-vice presidents,
if someone was reluctant to take on all the
responsibility of a position, but was willing to share
it. That seems to work well. More in another post,
this could get too long--
Melody
co-Vice President in Dallas
--- astro46(a)apricoto.com wrote:
interesting. it seems that few groups have an
elected board. based on what i
hear here and in conversation with people from a
couple of other communities
that have elected boards, 'coercion' and begging are
the primary slating
mechanisms. and, the unelected boards seem to have
more continuity, ie the
same people serving for a longer number of years
than with elected boards.
is this impression incorrect?
jeffrey
chicago