How does one address the problem of the band/caller that "no one" likes?
More specifically, what happens if a band and/or caller "owns" a dance series, but dancers don't want to go to their dances? (For whatever reason - they have subpar skills, they're perceived as curmudgeonly, their repertoire is not popular any more, they're passe aka same old same old, they're unfortunate victims of vagaries of constantly shifting and subjective popular opinion, etc.)
Is this really a problem that other organizers should worry about?
Why or why not?
And if yes, then what should/could another organizer do?
- 2014 NEFFA session
** Please RETAIN SUBJECT LINE in all replies! Especially IF YOU GET THE DIGEST! ***
What do people think about New Events that conflict with an existing dance series? ("New Events" could be single event dances or a new dance series.)
Sub-questions:
1. Is it a problem? Not a problem? Why/why not?
2. What defines a conflict?
Same weekend, same day, same time, same type of event?Within 2 mile, 20 mile, 200 mile radius?
3. What, if any, is the responsibility of an organizer of a 'new event' to avoid conflicts with existing dances? Why/Why not?
4. Can we get insight on this by looking at parallel examples in other realms (small business, education, global markets, religious institutions, other forms of entertainment, etc.)?
- 2014 NEFFA session
** Please RETAIN SUBJECT LINE in all replies! Especially IF YOU GET THE DIGEST! ***
"Dance, when you're broken open... dance, when you're perfectly free" ~ Rumi
chrissyfowler.combelfastflyingshoes.orgwestbranchwords.com
I just got back from NEFFA (such bliss!) and enjoyed a zesty session for
dance organizers. Spent much of the 5 hr trip back ruminating on
various threads from the exchanges in that session and am curious what
the SW list will have for insight/advice/opinion/feedback re various
topics. So... I'm going to post questions on a few of those topics, in
general terms.
Stay tuned!
REQUEST: If you have
anythign to offer on the topic, please retain the subject line of the
particular thread (since I'm posting several very different topics at
once). And please reply to only one topic per email. (Keep each topic
separate, so that anyone reading the archive can easily find your
splendid thoughts on the topic.) Thanks!
This note is especially for those of us WHO GET THE DIGEST. (Yes, this means me/you!)
Chrissy Fowler
Belfast ME
"Dance, when you're broken open... dance, when you're perfectly free" ~ Rumi
chrissyfowler.combelfastflyingshoes.orgwestbranchwords.com
Orin--
Our contra dance dealt with a very similar situation a few years ago. I
am concerned that this may be the same person, in fact. But regardless of
the person involved, it is important to deal with the problems, as this may
have a very severe impact on the dance community, of course as well as the
individuals involved.
Our volunteer dance-organizing committee had many meetings after we started
getting complaints about the problems created by the individual dancer.
Our basic instincts are to keep our dance open to all, and to allow for
individual differences. However, we also have to recognize that we are a
public institution, and that we are responsible for *all* the dancers. We
can't guarantee that all will have a good time, but we have a
responsibility to keep the behavior of a single person from hurting the
experience of others.
In our experience, the same set of behaviors was repeated: he preyed on
young women, often new-comers to the dance, and his leering and dominating
behavior was so unpleasant that some stopped coming to dances. Thanks to
some who did come and complain to us, as members of the Contra Dance
Umbrella (CDU) organizing community, we finally took some action. This
started with a couple of us talking directly to the problem dancer, and
though we got some level of verbal agreement from him, that he would pay
attention to what the women with whom he was dancing had rights to not be
agressively twirled, and so on. However, none of this made a difference
over the long term.
After we started talking about this among the CDU, some of us wanted to try
to talk further to him, and had phone and in-person conversations. None of
these seemed to have any impact. More importantly, in the long run, it
forced our committee to come up with a policy to deal with "inappropriate
behavior" which I'm attaching to this email. This was largely based on a
policy we found on-line from the Princeton NJ Country Dancers; we do not
claim to be inventing this from whole cloth.
The essence of our policy is that we decided we had to base it on
complaints from others, not from a "set of rules" that we would try to
enforce. We felt it was not possible to define "inappropriate behavior",
even though we all felt we could identify it. Our response is therefore
triggered by complaints, as you will see. It gives some measure of "due
process" to the situation, because of our commitment to fairness, and
wanting to avoid the risk of a false accusation. But it also takes
seriously the *feeling* of discomfort and invasion of personal space that
has such an impact on dancers subjected to inappropriate behavior, and it
spells out some concrete steps we will take after receiving a complaint.
The privacy of the complainant is protected, as is the identity of the
accused person. The policy calls for escalating sanctions if the behavior
continues, up to banning the dancer from the dance. We consulted with our
local (rural) police department during this process, and confirmed that we
do have the right to ask someone to leave, if their behavior is
inappropriate, and to call the police department to remove the person as a
trespasser if the request is not honored. This is not something we want to
have to do! But it is helpful to know that we are on firm legal ground if
we need to call in the troops.
The need to rely on a complaint remains a weakness of this approach, as it
requires someone who is traumatized to come forward. The corollary is that
it is important for committee members to be identifiable, and to make
efforts to publicize the fact that we will take action if someone feels
uncomfortable, to encourage people to come forward. We have made some
serious strides, including wearing buttons at dances which identify us, and
posting pictures of the CDU in the Grange Hall where our dances are held.
Some of us have further ideas, including posting notices in the restrooms
about the recourse available in case of problems. There may be more things
we can and should do.
This experience was still fresh in our minds when the "Puttin' on the
Dance" organizers' conference was held in the fall of 2011, put on by the
CDSS. At that conference, one of the workshops was about just this
problem, led by Chris Weiler. At that workshop, 3 of us from the CDU gave
out copies of this policy, and took part in a long discussion about the
various issues involved--the civil rights of people accused of
"inappropriate behavior" and also the rights of people to come and dance
and feel safe. In the end, I felt quite comfortable with the policy as we
formulated it--with the concerns noted above about having to wait for
complaints. I don't feel we have the perfect answer--but it is
considerably better than having no answer at all, as we did before we were
confronted with the problem dancer. We heard at least a few stories of the
dances which were largely destroyed by the discomfort invoked by a single
problem dancer. We know we are not the only dance community which has had
to deal with this sort of problem, and that the individual with whom we
were dealing is not the only one. We've talked since with many callers
who know many more stories about the problems which can be caused by an
individual, more obvious sometimes from their vantage point than from the
dance floor.
I found the sense of solidarity which I got from talking with other
organizers at the conference an enormous help, as well as the endorsement
of our policy by many of those we spoke with. I encourage others to take
advantage of opportunities like that, and of the interactions available on
this forum, which I found out about as a result of that conference.
The end of the story of our interactions with our particular problem came
when we sent a formal letter, via registered mail to the person involved,
stating that he would be banned if another complaint was received and
substantiated. We sent this from a PO box rented for the purpose, where
the receipt which proved that he got it was received. We have not had the
person show up since. I'm sorry if he has surfaced elsewhere, though I
can't say I'm surprised. Good for you for taking this issue
seriously--it is not easy, but it is necessary. For our committee, it was
a growth experience, making us take our responsibility to heart. Best
wishes to all!
Tim Swartz
(note--these are my individual thoughts, not an official response from the
CDU)
I think Tim attached the CDU policy to his wonderfully detailed and thoughtful post, but in my inbox it was scrubbed (whatever "scrubbed" stands for...). In any case, it wasn't attached.
Since Tim referenced the 2011 POTD conference, I'll refer everyone to the Puttin' on the Dance archive (puttinonthedance.org/post-conference/archive/) A link to the CDU policy is there. Look for Positive Solutions for Problems in your Dance Community.
Cheers!
Chrissy Fowler
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: 09-12-16 CDU policy on inappropriate behavior.doc
Positive Solutions for Problems in your Dance Community – Chris Weiler - Session Notes, Chris’s Presentation Outline and Montpelier’s Contra Dance Umbrella policy on inappropriate behavior.
What
do you do when someone is assaulted at your dance? How do you respond
when people complain about that “creepy” dancer? When someone is dancing
in a manner that is putting their partners in danger? How do you do it
and still maintain the goal of being a welcoming, tolerant community?
It’s best to be prepared before it happens to you. We’ll discuss these
issues through role play, sharing experiences and thoughtful discussion.
Howdy Folks,
I wish this forum existed when I was really active promoting dances. So
nice to see issues hashed out. Being responsible for running one dance a
year makes it easier.
Over the years running the old North Yarmouth Maine Dance I had a few
problem dancers and while so often we think of the dance as a community in
the end the process is often in the hands of a few folks for even one
dedicated soul.
When an individual pays at the door they are purchasing a revocable license
to attend which can be revoked (hence the name) at any point for any reason.
I too struggled with extreme consequences but when a dancer is hurting
someone or stepping out of bounds I see no need to consider civil or any
other presumed rights really.
Our dance community is such a civil society which might find confrontation
horrible but certain activities can seriously hurt the dance.
I feel that a registered letter is a tad cold, direct conversation may be
more useful but if need be, grasp the nettle(some dancer) firmly & give 'em
the boot however you must.
But why wait for extreme bad actors? Lots of folks could use some friendly
ad hoc life coaching. From suggesting breath mints to urging a gentler
swing, a few words can work wonders.
However once after a few years of polite chat aimed at modifying behavior
of some moderately obnoxious offenders finally one year I sat three men
down & gave 'em New Year's Resolutions. One stayed away, one changed his
attitude, & one, well, some folks will never change.
Ours is a open community & more than a few people have been socialized
into acting more appropriately over time. Perhaps if more borderline
dancers realized there were consequences there would be less issues?
Thanks, Be well, Jeff Raymond
--
Visit http://groups.google.com/group/mainefolk-news
In the rare instances I'm aware of where a trespass notice was issued in
writing, the recipient didn't return.
Rather than escalating this kind of situation where the recipient wouldn't
respect such a notice into the legal system through a primarily
policy-based approach, it might be worth engaging the assistance of someone
skilled in de-escalating conflict. For instance, taking a page from the
nightclubs' playbook and hiring an off-duty police officer to work at the
welcome table for a few dances would have the benefit of someone present
on-site who would presumably have some previous experience handling that
sort of thing in the moment.
Peter
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Orin Nisenson <orin(a)nisenson.com> wrote:
> The reason I suggested a contract is that it lays down the paper trail
> that may be needed if any legal action is taken.
>
> I agree that you can not cover all bad behaviors but you can cover the
> basics that are expected of all dancers.
>
> If you look at the back of tickets for many sporting and theater event
> there is some sort of contract language. This gives the organizers some
> form of legal rights to act. I am not suggestion that that become the
> practice in the contra dance world. Contracts should be reserved for those
> who fail to respond to legitimate complaints/concerns of improper behavior.
> Of course the definition of improper behavior is a whole different can of
> worms (no offence to worms meant).
>
> This person has been spoken to by many people many different times. I
> doubt he would stop coming to a dance just because someone told him he was
> banned. He just does not listen to what he does not want to hear. It may be
> time for legal action.
>
> Orin
>
>
>
>
>
> I agree with Jeff. We are a national community (in some ways, at least),
>> and we owe it to the dancers we serve to make our spaces safe for
>> everybody. Maybe, if a newcomer is making people uncomfortable, talking
>> to
>> that newcomer might change his behavior. But that's not your situation.
>> If Josh has been harassing and sometimes hurting women for more than five
>> years, despite being talked to consistently by many dance organizers, then
>> assuming that the same talking-to is going to have any effect just doesn't
>> make much sense.
>>
>> I disagree with Orin's approach. No matter how tight you make a written
>> contract, you won't be able to include every single possibly bad behavior.
>> And some behaviors (like leering) are too hard to define with any
>> precision. Consulting a lawyer might be good advice, but keep in mind
>> that
>> you always have the right to expel somebody from your dance. People get
>> expelled from "public" events that require an admission fee all the time
>> for breaking norms; look at any time somebody jumps on the field during a
>> baseball game, or try rushing the stage at a concert, etc. Those events
>> are just as public as a contra dance (open to everybody who pays the price
>> of admission).
>>
>> I understand that some people on this list likely have problems with
>> naming
>> particular problem dancers. I think it's our duty to do so. We owe it to
>> dancers to put on a safe event, and trying to hide names of people who
>> make
>> our dances unsafe detracts from that goal.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Orin Nisenson <orin(a)nisenson.com> wrote:
>>
>> I strongly suggest that you consult a lawyer to find out what your
>>> options
>>> are and to make sure you protect yourself. I would think the law is
>>> different for a public dance compared to a private dance/club.
>>>
>>> I also suggest that you do a written contract with him so that there is
>>> no
>>> confusion. I once convinced him to stop a particular behavior. The next
>>> week he was doing it again. When I reminded him of our conversation the
>>> week before he responded "oh, that was for last weeks dance"
>>>
>> >
>>
>>> Orin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Oy ...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> First thanks to all for their support and information , both on this
>>>> list
>>>> and off-list .. I will be following up independently with those that
>>>> e-mailed me in the next few days .
>>>>
>>>> Yes it is the same person that caused so much trouble up in the Boston
>>>> area...
>>>> We are currently working on outreach to any dancers effected ( At least
>>>> those that we can contact and are willing to talk to us about this
>>>> sensitive issue)
>>>>
>>>> So now we are on the horns of an ethical dilemma , or many different
>>>> but
>>>> related ones .. :-(
>>>>
>>>> Should this person get the same treatment that someone with no history
>>>> of
>>>> harassing behavior should reasonably expect to receive ?
>>>> Should he be "talked to" about his actions and "given a chance to
>>>> change"
>>>> ?
>>>> Should a "stepped" ban be considered ? ( Say ban for two months now ,
>>>> and
>>>>
>>> >> "probation" after ? )
>>
>>> Should any consideration be given to our not having had a clearly
>>>> written
>>>> and posted set of "rules" ?
>>>>
>>>> Btw we are working on a "policy" now and I have read every dance
>>>> organization policy on the subject that I can find . I suspect that
>>>> the
>>>> object of such rules or policy should be to make the dancers
>>>> comfortable (
>>>> new and old ) and provide recourse to the dance community if someone
>>>> violates the folkways of the community .. It might be better to
>>>> encourage
>>>> communication within the more experienced dancers in the community and
>>>> get
>>>> them to let the new dancers know through words and deeds what is
>>>> acceptable
>>>> , what is not and how to tell the difference..
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>> Rgds Q
>>>>
>>>> Ps Perry ( our american dance chair ) will be at NEFFA this weekend ,
>>>> If
>>>> anyone has any personal experiences about this problem please let him
>>>> know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> While there are things to be said for having a code of conduct (and my
>>>>
>>>>> organization does have one),
>>>>> having one in place is neither necessary nor sufficient for dealing
>>>>> with
>>>>> this person.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to have a comforting female organizer get in touch with
>>>>> some of the "disappeared" women
>>>>> and discuss what's happened with them? This may help assure them that
>>>>> the organization cares
>>>>> about their comfort and safety and that of the dancers who continue,
>>>>> and
>>>>> will also help to establish
>>>>> how far over the boundaries his behaviors have gone, which might also
>>>>> help you to decide whether
>>>>> the guy needs a talking to and careful watching with banning in
>>>>> reserve,
>>>>> or just immediate banning.
>>>>> (Or whether the women not coming back to contra is all an unfortunate
>>>>> coincidence.)
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Alan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/21/2014 1:06 PM, Quintin Aspin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Down here in Baltimore we are having a problem with a dancer who
>>>>>> seems to be harassing young ladies , He seems particularly fond of
>>>>>> monopolizing their dances if he can , then moves on to sending
>>>>>> e-mails and giving small gifts ... Shortly there after these
>>>>>> unfortunately targeted newcomers seem to stop coming to the dance ...
>>>>>> They do not complain to anyone in charge , they just disappear from
>>>>>> the dance community ..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is a situation that I , as president of BFMS , only recently
>>>>>> became aware of , but in retrospect it seems to have been happening
>>>>>> to some extent since he moved down from the Boston area .
>>>>>> If this is a "new" behavior and he is amenable to change I will
>>>>>> either talk to him , or suggest the American dance chair has a few
>>>>>> words with him ... But if , as I now suspect , he was doing this same
>>>>>> behaviors in the Boston area perhaps firmer action might be needed .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There was , in fact , a discussion over on the callers list about a
>>>>>> dancer in the Boston area that seems eerily reminiscent of the
>>>>>> situation here ..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If any of the Boston area dance folks know of whom I speak , or if he
>>>>>> was banned from any dances up there it would be enormously helpful if
>>>>>> you could send me an e-mail with just the first name of the gent in
>>>>>> question ....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>> You can send it to my regular e-mail ( the one I am
>> subscribed to
>>
>>> this list ) or to be at
>>>>>> President ( at ) bfms.org ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A thousand thanks from me and from a lot of dancers who hopefully
>>>>>> will not have to find out first hand about which they should be
>>>>>> thankful ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rgds Quintin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ps I have looked at all the contra dance "codes of conduct" I can
>>>>>> find and we are having a getting to get one set up here ....
>>>>>> Hopefully not shutting the gate after the horse ... etc..
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Organizers mailing list
>>>>>> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
>>>>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Organizers mailing list
>>>>> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
>>>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>
>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Organizers mailing list
>>>> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
>>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> U.S. Virgin Islands Snow Plowing Service.
>>> Serving St. Croix, St. Thomas & St. John.
>>> Fast reliable service, driveways & parking lots / no job
>>> too small or large
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Organizers mailing list
>>> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Casserly
>> (cell) 781 258-2761
>> _______________________________________________
>> Organizers mailing list
>> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>>
>
>
> --
> U.S. Virgin Islands Snow Plowing Service.
> Serving St. Croix, St. Thomas & St. John.
> Fast reliable service, driveways & parking lots / no job
> too small or large
> _______________________________________________
> Organizers mailing list
> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>
I agree with Jeff. We are a national community (in some ways, at least),
and we owe it to the dancers we serve to make our spaces safe for
everybody. Maybe, if a newcomer is making people uncomfortable, talking to
that newcomer might change his behavior. But that's not your situation.
If Josh has been harassing and sometimes hurting women for more than five
years, despite being talked to consistently by many dance organizers, then
assuming that the same talking-to is going to have any effect just doesn't
make much sense.
I disagree with Orin's approach. No matter how tight you make a written
contract, you won't be able to include every single possibly bad behavior.
And some behaviors (like leering) are too hard to define with any
precision. Consulting a lawyer might be good advice, but keep in mind that
you always have the right to expel somebody from your dance. People get
expelled from "public" events that require an admission fee all the time
for breaking norms; look at any time somebody jumps on the field during a
baseball game, or try rushing the stage at a concert, etc. Those events
are just as public as a contra dance (open to everybody who pays the price
of admission).
I understand that some people on this list likely have problems with naming
particular problem dancers. I think it's our duty to do so. We owe it to
dancers to put on a safe event, and trying to hide names of people who make
our dances unsafe detracts from that goal.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Orin Nisenson <orin(a)nisenson.com> wrote:
> I strongly suggest that you consult a lawyer to find out what your options
> are and to make sure you protect yourself. I would think the law is
> different for a public dance compared to a private dance/club.
>
> I also suggest that you do a written contract with him so that there is no
> confusion. I once convinced him to stop a particular behavior. The next
> week he was doing it again. When I reminded him of our conversation the
> week before he responded "oh, that was for last weeks dance"
>
> Orin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Oy ...
>>
>> First thanks to all for their support and information , both on this list
>> and off-list .. I will be following up independently with those that
>> e-mailed me in the next few days .
>>
>> Yes it is the same person that caused so much trouble up in the Boston
>> area...
>> We are currently working on outreach to any dancers effected ( At least
>> those that we can contact and are willing to talk to us about this
>> sensitive issue)
>>
>> So now we are on the horns of an ethical dilemma , or many different but
>> related ones .. :-(
>>
>> Should this person get the same treatment that someone with no history of
>> harassing behavior should reasonably expect to receive ?
>> Should he be "talked to" about his actions and "given a chance to change"
>> ?
>> Should a "stepped" ban be considered ? ( Say ban for two months now , and
>> "probation" after ? )
>> Should any consideration be given to our not having had a clearly written
>> and posted set of "rules" ?
>>
>> Btw we are working on a "policy" now and I have read every dance
>> organization policy on the subject that I can find . I suspect that the
>> object of such rules or policy should be to make the dancers comfortable (
>> new and old ) and provide recourse to the dance community if someone
>> violates the folkways of the community .. It might be better to encourage
>> communication within the more experienced dancers in the community and get
>> them to let the new dancers know through words and deeds what is acceptable
>> , what is not and how to tell the difference..
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Rgds Q
>>
>> Ps Perry ( our american dance chair ) will be at NEFFA this weekend , If
>> anyone has any personal experiences about this problem please let him know.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> While there are things to be said for having a code of conduct (and my
>>> organization does have one),
>>> having one in place is neither necessary nor sufficient for dealing with
>>> this person.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to have a comforting female organizer get in touch with
>>> some of the "disappeared" women
>>> and discuss what's happened with them? This may help assure them that
>>> the organization cares
>>> about their comfort and safety and that of the dancers who continue, and
>>> will also help to establish
>>> how far over the boundaries his behaviors have gone, which might also
>>> help you to decide whether
>>> the guy needs a talking to and careful watching with banning in reserve,
>>> or just immediate banning.
>>> (Or whether the women not coming back to contra is all an unfortunate
>>> coincidence.)
>>>
>>> -- Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/21/2014 1:06 PM, Quintin Aspin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Down here in Baltimore we are having a problem with a dancer who
>>>> seems to be harassing young ladies , He seems particularly fond of
>>>> monopolizing their dances if he can , then moves on to sending
>>>> e-mails and giving small gifts ... Shortly there after these
>>>> unfortunately targeted newcomers seem to stop coming to the dance ...
>>>> They do not complain to anyone in charge , they just disappear from
>>>> the dance community ..
>>>>
>>>> It is a situation that I , as president of BFMS , only recently
>>>> became aware of , but in retrospect it seems to have been happening
>>>> to some extent since he moved down from the Boston area .
>>>> If this is a "new" behavior and he is amenable to change I will
>>>> either talk to him , or suggest the American dance chair has a few
>>>> words with him ... But if , as I now suspect , he was doing this same
>>>> behaviors in the Boston area perhaps firmer action might be needed .
>>>>
>>>> There was , in fact , a discussion over on the callers list about a
>>>> dancer in the Boston area that seems eerily reminiscent of the
>>>> situation here ..
>>>>
>>>> If any of the Boston area dance folks know of whom I speak , or if he
>>>> was banned from any dances up there it would be enormously helpful if
>>>> you could send me an e-mail with just the first name of the gent in
>>>> question ....
>>>>
>>>> You can send it to my regular e-mail ( the one I am subscribed to
>>>> this list ) or to be at
>>>> President ( at ) bfms.org ...
>>>>
>>>> A thousand thanks from me and from a lot of dancers who hopefully
>>>> will not have to find out first hand about which they should be
>>>> thankful ...
>>>>
>>>> Rgds Quintin
>>>>
>>>> Ps I have looked at all the contra dance "codes of conduct" I can
>>>> find and we are having a getting to get one set up here ....
>>>> Hopefully not shutting the gate after the horse ... etc..
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Organizers mailing list
>>>> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
>>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Organizers mailing list
>>> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Organizers mailing list
>> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>>
>
>
> --
> U.S. Virgin Islands Snow Plowing Service.
> Serving St. Croix, St. Thomas & St. John.
> Fast reliable service, driveways & parking lots / no job
> too small or large
>
> _______________________________________________
> Organizers mailing list
> Organizers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
>
--
David Casserly
(cell) 781 258-2761
Anyone have a written code of conduct that you can refer to ? In Palm
Beach County FL we have 1 or 2 dancers whose behavior is off-putting,
especially to newer dancers. It would be great to be able to refer to a
written policy.
--
David Fenwick
*Atlantic Property Management*
Economic professional management *Orange Blossom Ball* Jan
17-19 2014
www.orangeblossomcontra.com
954-918-5884
* Property Management & Maintenance *