Tom, at a guess, Aahz is not talking about NOT
spending time on the swing,
 nor about neglecting to teach dancers how to start/end one--just that the
 finer points of technique aren't a priority for the beginner's lesson. Of
 course any teacher worth their salt will teach that a swing always ends
 with the lady on the right. But I think all Aahz is saying is that, IF the
 dancers end the swing with the lady on the right, it doesn't really matter
 how they get there--fumbling through a swing happens, and it's easy to
 recover from, while moves that involve the rest of your hands-4 or the rest
 of the set have potential to cause way more disruption to the dance if
 botched.
 I agree that the buzz-step is not the be-all, end-all of contra swing!
 I've been dancing for going on 5 years and I pretty much exclusively
 walk-swing, because I find it more comfortable and easy to control, and
 don't actually like swinging extremely fast.
 John mentions the bad habits that even experienced dancers may have while
 swinging, such as:
 - grip, clamp, squeeze, hang, press
 - hold their partner in the wrong place so it is uncomfortable
 - use too much strength and try to do silly things like making their
 partners feet leave the floor
 - lean sideways or backwards
 - start twirls too late and when they are facing the wrong way so that they
 end up in the wrong place
 I find it pretty telling that this list of habits actually has nothing to
 do with footwork! In my opinion, the reason to teach walking swing instead
 of buzz-step to beginners is that there's SO MUCH ELSE to concentrate on.
 The more things we can abstract away, the easier a time beginners will have
 learning what's left. If you're focusing on strange new footwork (and I
 find that buzz-stepping beginners tend to think that the buzz-stepping is
 the most important part of the swing, and concentrate more on that than on
 their frame), it's harder to pick up things like giving weight, a proper
 hold, etc. But everyone already knows how to walk!
 I would also add that I would much rather dance with someone doing a
 funky/odd/strange/unpracticed walking swing than a
 funky/odd/strange/unpracticed buzz step. I find that there are fewer ways
 to mess up a walk, and that there's less potential for your partner to be
 uncomfortable or perhaps harmed than with one of those galloping,
 out-of-control excited-pony buzz step swings.
 Just my two cents!
 Cheers,
 Maia
 On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Amy Wimmer via Callers <
 callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
  I love John's idea of teaching the buzz step
as individuals first,
 then as couples. The most frequent complaints I hear from men is that
 women hang on them and don't hold up their own weight during a swing.
 The most frequent complaint I hear from women is men pulling them off
 their feet and going too fast. If they can learn to hold themselves
 upright on their own first, then everyone will have a much more
 enjoyable experience.
 -Amy
  On Jun 21, 2015, at 3:44 AM, John Sweeney via
Callers < 
 callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
 
 Yes, of course I always tell dancers that they can walk instead of 
 buzz, but
  the buzz-step is so much more fun that it seems
crazy not to teach it 
 when
  every dance is going to have a swing and usually
two.
 <Digression:> Yes, I love swinging, and have been loving it for fifty 
 years
  now, but why does every new dance have to have
two swings?  Oh no, not
 Neighbour Balance & Swing, Circle Left 3/4, Partner Swing again - that's
 half the dance gone with nothing new or interesting in it! (And 
 changing the
  Circle Left 3/4 to Men/Ladies Allemande 1 &
1/2 does not make it more
 interesting!)  I write lots of dances with one or zero swings - a 
 zero-swing
  dance can have so much good stuff in it that the
dancers don't even 
 notice
  there is no swing; they are having too much fun.
It always puzzles me 
 when
  people take a great one-swing dance and
re-choreograph it to add a 
 second
  swing, losing part of what made it a great dance
just for the sake of 
 even
  more swinging. <End of digression.>
 I found it interesting that Ron said, "the buzz-step swing gets axed if 
I'm
  short on time".  If I only had time to teach
one thing then the only 
 thing I
  would teach would be the buzz-step swing, and how
to finish it so you 
 end up
  in the right place.  I can't think of
anything else that newcomers can't
 learn during the walk-throughs.
 Question: If you were calling for a group with a dozen newcomers in the 
 hall
  out of 100 people, and the organizers said you
could have two minutes
 teaching before you started the first walk-through, what would you 
 teach?
  For me the answer is obvious, every dance has a
buzz-step swing; teach a
 buzz-step swing.
 Another reason for teaching swinging is that there are a significant 
 number
  of "experienced" dancers who have bad
swinging habits.  I dance all 
 over the
  USA and the UK and wherever I go there are always
some people who:
 - grip, clamp, squeeze, hang, press
 - hold their partner in the wrong place so it is uncomfortable
 - use too much strength and try to do silly things like making their
 partners feet leave the floor
 - lean sideways or backwards
 - start twirls too late and when they are facing the wrong way so that 
 they
  end up in the wrong place
 - etc.
 If just a couple of those dancers pick up on any of these points and 
 improve
  their swinging then you have done good work!
 Yes, I hate it when callers talk too much and take time out of dancing 
 time.
  But this can be really short:
 Sample teach:
 = = = = = = = =
 Hi, I'm John.  We have some new people here today and they are going to
 spend half an hour swinging tonight, so please let's spend a minute or 
 two
  on showing them how it's done.  And all you
great dancers out there why 
 not
  see if you can't make your swing even better
for you and your partners.
 This is called a buzz-step swing.
 First, let go of you partner completely. Put your left toe just behind 
 your
  right foot like this. Now walk fast on the spot.
Now push with your left
 foor as though you were on a skateboard and turn clockwise by yourself 
 on
  the spot. Relax your knees so you don't
bounce up and down.  See how
 smoothly.you can turn with the minimum of effort.
 Now take your partner in a ballroom hold - the man's hand on the lady's
 shoulderblade - it is far more comfotable for the lady if you hold them 
 up
  high.  Now relax - make sure you are not pressing
on any part of your
 partner.
 And swing - it should be a gentle embrace where, as a single 
 counterbalanced
  unit, you glide smoothly and effortlessly around.
Smile at your partner 
 and
  you won't get dizzy.
 Now think of your joined hands as an arrowhead and finish pointing at 
 the
  other couple.
 If you are having trouble with the buzz-step then you can always just 
 walk.
  = = = = = = = =
 I just timed that and it took less than 90 seconds. Surely that is worth
 doing!
 Yes, some of them won’t get it, but for those who do you have just 
 greatly
  enhanced their enjoyment of the evening.
 Anyway, that's what I think. :-)
 Happy dancing,
 John
 John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
 
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
 _______________________________________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
 
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net 
_______________________________________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
 
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net