Wow this certainly has been quite the thread since I have been away, but I have some
thoughts about teaching the swing and teaching the lesson in general.
I have been told that new dancers can memorize at most 3 or 4 new things from a lesson, so
I'm not going to try to inundate them with a lot of new stuff/jargon/etc. My goal is
to get them to know the structure of the dance but also to relax and note that whether
they do things properly or not is not the point, but to enjoy the experience.
As for the swing - I do demonstrate the buzz step but I don't necessarily say that
it's better than the walking step. I have them try both and let them give the
option. I do a swing demo where I walk and the other person buzzes and note that it's
just as nice if you are giving good weight. Of course good weight during a swing is also
important - I note that both people in the swing need to give weight, but I don't
belabor that fact and let them try it a few times with different people to get the feel of
it. Perfection is not a must, even good form isn't all that important to me, just
that they get the feel of it and end with the proper person on the right.
I teach very few moves during a lesson. Usually do-si-dos, but I don't belabor that,
and allemandes, swings and chains. That's about it - those are things you can pretty
much expect in almost every dance out there. Everything else can be taught during the
course of a dance. I focus on weight and on dance structure - lining up, progression,
hall geography, up and down, etc - because those are things they will need to know for
every dance.
One thing that is starting to bug me is seeing heys taught in the workshop. I find that a
waste of time. I know that some callers feel that it needs a lot of explanation so they do
it in their workshops, but how many heys do you have an evening usually? Two maybe,
perhaps even three. I feel that's best taught during the course of the dance with
experienced dancers pointing the way, and even if they don't do it right, as long as
they know where to be and who to be with when the hey is over, that's golden for me.
I agree with Tom - let's not give the dancers a lot to focus on right at the start.
Let them relax and let them know it's just a dance and if they don't get it
exactly right, enjoy the experience and keep on coming back and you'll get better.
Perry
From: Tom Hinds via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
To: Maia McCormick <maia.mcc(a)gmail.com>
Cc: "callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Callers] Buzz Step Swing
Maia,
Personally I really don't give a hoot which swing people teach. I've voiced my
opinion and I'm ready to move on. My real concern is my own dance in C'ville
which seems to be going down hill. Callers have done such horrible jobs teaching the
lesson that the board voted to have me teach all of the lessons. What's important to
me is that the swing is taught well and safely no matter which one is chosen. I've
responded to some of your points in sprinkles below.
On Jun 21, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Maia McCormick via Callers wrote:
Tom, at a guess, Aahz is not talking about NOT spending time on the swing, nor about
neglecting to teach dancers how to start/end one--just that the finer points of technique
aren't a priority for the beginner's lesson.
Yes that's a guess. And he wasn't real specific in his first email. I believe
he mentioned sashayed in a latter email so that's probably what he meant, ending a
swing with the lady on left, man on the right.
John mentions the bad habits that even experienced dancers may have while swinging, such
as:
- grip, clamp, squeeze, hang, press- hold their partner in the wrong place so it is
uncomfortable- use too much strength and try to do silly things like making theirpartners
feet leave the floor- lean sideways or backwards- start twirls too late and when they are
facing the wrong way so that theyend up in the wrong place
What's your conclusion and what's the bigger picture? Perhaps the dance community
is full of bad teachers and/or bad students or something else is going on..........Or is
all of the above OK? We're not MWSDers or ballet dancers are we?
I find it pretty telling that this list of habits actually has nothing to do with
footwork! In my opinion, the reason to teach walking swing instead of buzz-step to
beginners is that there's SO MUCH ELSE to concentrate on.
NO! NO, NO, NO!!!! I have to strongly disagree with you here. There isn't SO MUCH
ELSE to concentrate on. I have no doubt that I program a dance night way differently than
you or the others do. How I program and how I teach the lesson are unique to me and both
fit together and the newbies are never overwhelmed by SO MUCH ELSE.
I haven't seen you or the others call but I have to say that there's this stage
that some of us go through where we perceive the beginners as deficient and therefore
need to be stuffed with all of these rules, moves etc. so that we can have a REAL modern
urban contra dance. I went through that stage but I'm over it now. I see it in many
callers. The real secret to calling as far as I'm concerned has to do with
personality and emotions, not moves. For me, dancing is a vehicle to community.
Perhaps the dancers in your area have certain expectation of a dance level. I'm
fortunate here in C'ville that the dancers don't have those expectations. They
are real laid back.
I didn't say this yet but I've come to the conclusion that one's calling is a
system. If you value or choose one aspect in that system you, by default choose other
aspects. Programming and the beginning workshop should fit logically together.
There's so much that goes into programming and there's so much that goes into
choosing one's system that I find this little discussion about swing to be a bit
meaningless. In C'ville in the last two years, those who didn't teach a swing at
all had lousy programs-I mean most of the floor went home at the break-it's that bad!!
The two seem to be correlated. If you're unskilled in one you tend to be unskilled
in the other.
The more things we can abstract away, the easier a time beginners will have learning
what's left. If you're focusing on strange new footwork (and I find that
buzz-stepping beginners tend to think that the buzz-stepping is the most important part of
the swing, and concentrate more on that than on their frame), it's harder to pick up
things like giving weight, a proper hold, etc. But everyone already knows how to walk!
I consider the way I teach a buzz step swing to be efficient, maybe taking 5 minutes for a
small group.
Maia, perhaps you should watch my beginning workshop.
At the end of my workshop they are ready!!!. The integration of the beginners into the
evening's dance is seamless. If they survive the beginning lesson (which they all
can) the rest of the evening is literally a piece of cake because of the way I program.
I'm human and it doesn't always go well but in general it does.
I would also add that I would much rather dance with someone doing a
funky/odd/strange/unpracticed walking swing than a funky/odd/strange/unpracticed buzz
step.
I've also come to the conclusion that everything that goes on at a contra dance can be
boiled down to plain emotions. I recently watched a caller who is a very good showman. I
think he's insecure. He doesn't show compassion also so he fails as a
caller-doesn't establish a relationship with any of the dancers. I also think
he's afraid to teach (fear of boring the experienced dancers) so he does a rushed job
of all of his walk throughs. The beginners have their own emotional reaction to this:
frustration big time.
Perhaps you think that we humans are rational. But the truth is we are emotional and the
emotional side of us bring in the rational side to justify what we want. As I see it,
most of this talk is just BS-rational sounding BS for what we really feel and value. I
value the buzz and therefore feel like teaching the buzz step swing. John also values the
buzz so that's what he does. Someone else may not value the buzz or doesn't know
how to do it, so that's what they feel like doing.
I find that there are fewer ways to mess up a walk, and that there's less potential
for your partner to be uncomfortable or perhaps harmed than with one of those galloping,
out-of-control excited-pony buzz step swings.
Just my two cents!
Cheers,Maia
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Amy Wimmer via Callers
<callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I love John's idea of teaching the buzz step as individuals first,
then as couples. The most frequent complaints I hear from men is that
women hang on them and don't hold up their own weight during a swing.
The most frequent complaint I hear from women is men pulling them off
their feet and going too fast. If they can learn to hold themselves
upright on their own first, then everyone will have a much more
enjoyable experience.
-Amy
On Jun 21, 2015, at 3:44 AM, John Sweeney via Callers
<callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Yes, of course I always tell dancers that they can walk instead of buzz, but
the buzz-step is so much more fun that it seems crazy not to teach it when
every dance is going to have a swing and usually two.
<Digression:> Yes, I love swinging, and have been loving it for fifty years
now, but why does every new dance have to have two swings? Oh no, not
Neighbour Balance & Swing, Circle Left 3/4, Partner Swing again - that's
half the dance gone with nothing new or interesting in it! (And changing the
Circle Left 3/4 to Men/Ladies Allemande 1 & 1/2 does not make it more
interesting!) I write lots of dances with one or zero swings - a zero-swing
dance can have so much good stuff in it that the dancers don't even notice
there is no swing; they are having too much fun. It always puzzles me when
people take a great one-swing dance and re-choreograph it to add a second
swing, losing part of what made it a great dance just for the sake of even
more swinging. <End of digression.>
I found it interesting that Ron said, "the buzz-step swing gets axed if I'm
short on time". If I only had time to teach one thing then the only thing I
would teach would be the buzz-step swing, and how to finish it so you end up
in the right place. I can't think of anything else that newcomers can't
learn during the walk-throughs.
Question: If you were calling for a group with a dozen newcomers in the hall
out of 100 people, and the organizers said you could have two minutes
teaching before you started the first walk-through, what would you teach?
For me the answer is obvious, every dance has a buzz-step swing; teach a
buzz-step swing.
Another reason for teaching swinging is that there are a significant number
of "experienced" dancers who have bad swinging habits. I dance all over the
USA and the UK and wherever I go there are always some people who:
- grip, clamp, squeeze, hang, press
- hold their partner in the wrong place so it is uncomfortable
- use too much strength and try to do silly things like making their
partners feet leave the floor
- lean sideways or backwards
- start twirls too late and when they are facing the wrong way so that they
end up in the wrong place
- etc.
If just a couple of those dancers pick up on any of these points and improve
their swinging then you have done good work!
Yes, I hate it when callers talk too much and take time out of dancing time.
But this can be really short:
Sample teach:
= = = = = = = =
Hi, I'm John. We have some new people here today and they are going to
spend half an hour swinging tonight, so please let's spend a minute or two
on showing them how it's done. And all you great dancers out there why not
see if you can't make your swing even better for you and your partners.
This is called a buzz-step swing.
First, let go of you partner completely. Put your left toe just behind your
right foot like this. Now walk fast on the spot. Now push with your left
foor as though you were on a skateboard and turn clockwise by yourself on
the spot. Relax your knees so you don't bounce up and down. See how
smoothly.you can turn with the minimum of effort.
Now take your partner in a ballroom hold - the man's hand on the lady's
shoulderblade - it is far more comfotable for the lady if you hold them up
high. Now relax - make sure you are not pressing on any part of your
partner.
And swing - it should be a gentle embrace where, as a single counterbalanced
unit, you glide smoothly and effortlessly around. Smile at your partner and
you won't get dizzy.
Now think of your joined hands as an arrowhead and finish pointing at the
other couple.
If you are having trouble with the buzz-step then you can always just walk.
= = = = = = = =
I just timed that and it took less than 90 seconds. Surely that is worth
doing!
Yes, some of them won’t get it, but for those who do you have just greatly
enhanced their enjoyment of the evening.
Anyway, that's what I think. :-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________Callers mailing
listCallers@lists.sharedweight.nethttp://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net