29 Sep
2016
29 Sep
'16
1:41 p.m.
Lessons are a different ball of wax, especially if you are teaching both
roles to everyone. Sashes seem reasonable there. I'm talking about
dancers at the competent level and above at a normal dance.
The speed and complexity of squares makes visual signifiers too slow and
unhelpful; facing someone of the same gender could be correct, so all you
can really be responsible for is your own position.
As for calling to groups that role swap mid-square: that was my question,
too, when I was warned about a group. The caller just grinned and wished
me good luck. I've picked out a few solutions, some better than others.
1. Know if it is likely in advance.
2. Ask one set to be nice and dance pilot.
3. Only use modules for that group.
4. Pre-choreograph everything (common in southern AZ)
5. Watch at least two, or even three, sets for agreement if anything ever
looks odd. (A good idea anyway in case your pilot square breaks)
6. Keep it simple.
7. Call so fast they don't have time to fool around. (Can backfire!)
8. Embrace and encourage it during a particular square.
9. Watch a square that isn't smiling/is mostly older or serious.
10. See #1. Don't worry about it and just keep calling. If there is an
actual problem, they'll tell you.
Beginners don't do it--it's the folks who know enough to be dangerous.
Neal
On Sep 29, 2016 4:33 AM, "Jeremy Child" <jeremy.m.child(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Nick: Some good stuff in those links - thank you.
Donna: I love the idea of identifying your role by saying "boy" or
"girl". Thanks for the link to your web pages. I did try to look at your
FB group but got a "this content isn't available right now" error message.
Neal: I'm intrigued by the "not wearing bands/physical identifiers", and
more so by mid-tip role swapping. How does the caller cope? If xe is
purely using modules then there's no problem, but how does xe cope if xe is
sight calling? OK xe could memorise 4 positions rather than just two
couples, but if the dancers are role swapping xe may not be able to tell
what FASR the square is in.
In my MWSD classes I insist that the "boys" wear a sash and the
"girls"
don't - irrespective of actual gender. This is partly to make it easier to
see when the square has gone asymmetric, and partly to eliminate the idea
that "boy is the natural role of a man, so if a woman dances it she must be
marked out in some way (and vice versa)".
Jeremy
On 28 September 2016 at 18:54, Neal Schlein via Callers <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
My experience is basically the same as
Donna's, although I'd say the
gent/lady statement is less of a "convention" than a matter of simple
practicality. It usually gets said early in a dance or when actually
necessary.
In a square there is also no real need for ties/bands/vests/sashes for a
simple reason: the set is fully aware of itself. Everyone can see all of
the couples upon squaring up; we help each other remember who does what
anyway. In a really scrambled set everyone figures it's a minor miracle if
something doesn't break down regardless, and that's doubly true in clubs
where people actively swap roles during the dance. If it happens, you just
regroup and try again.
The frequent "Aack! I'm a ____!" when allemande left or star thru are
called is pretty funny, especially since it often comes from very
experienced dancers...who then proceed to go the wrong way with supreme
confidence. (Callers are even more susceptible, since our line is, "Aack!
I'm a DANCER!!!")
Neal
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net