[Callers] Ralph Page Style

[Neal Schlein via Callers]

Richard, I also recall reading that comment about Page's opinion on Chorus
Jig--I think it was in A Time to Dance, but might have been in Shadrack's
Delight.

I find a ball room swing that ends facing up and casting down the outside
> (one’s own side) a lot of fun - but perhaps you mean if you end the swing
> facing down - that certainly doesn’t flow as well.
> Martha
>
>
I was particularly thinking of an improper cast, yes, but the other depends
on the specific choreography, partner, music, speed, and line spacing.
Sometimes it works just fine, as you say, but the floor pattern isn't as
elegant and the relative speed can be all wrong for the dance narrative.
If you are swinging to improper and then are supposed to cast down,
however, that's simply not possible from a standard ballroom swing; the
best you can do is end the swing facing down and step apart to go down the
outside.  Then the dance loses its visual structure because there's no
actual cast.

It also doesn't work well if you are supposed to cross and cast--the timing
changes because you are already close together, plus you need to
disentangle.

I may have a somewhat unusual way of enjoying and assessing the flow of
dances, because I always envision them from above as I dance.  I'll
tolerate somewhat non-flowing choreography so long as the visual pattern
created is crisp and elegant.  On the other hand, dances that don't create
a distinctive and pretty floor pattern irk me greatly if the sequence isn't
100% natural.  (This includes just about every dance that needs the phrase
"ooze" or "shift" to describe the progression. Circling to a slide, or
promenading, or similar things are fine; "oozing" makes me think of
radioactive sludge!)

Neal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20161017/8f083f97/attachment.htm>