[Callers] Tempo for Squares

[Becky Liddle]

Maybe phrased squares can be a bit faster than contras because there is more resting (to catch your breath) in squares, waiting while the sides or heads do something... 
Becky

> On Sep 21, 2019, at 4:06 PM, callers-request at lists.sharedweight.net wrote:
> 
> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:36:37 -0400
> From: Rich Sbardella <richsbardella at gmail.com <mailto:richsbardella at gmail.com>>
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers at sharedweight.net <mailto:callers at sharedweight.net>>
> Subject: [Callers] Tempo for Squares
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAE4BujJAzmu=2XnBsdqTBpqGKhByXAKoGACfaF0mYRZNxszJ5A at mail.gmail.com <mailto:CAE4BujJAzmu=2XnBsdqTBpqGKhByXAKoGACfaF0mYRZNxszJ5A at mail.gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Folks,
> I am curious.  Tempo for contra is often below 120 bpm.  I learned to call
> squares at about 128 bpm.
> Is this significant difference the norm, and if so why?
> Rich Sbardella
> Stafford Springs, CT

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20190921/16af03d5/attachment.html>