[Callers] Jets / rubies genderfree terms redux: gems?

[Ron Blechner via Callers]

Erik, neat cheat.

For reference, my own thoughts on the terms, and a general FAQ about gender
free terms:
http://contradances.tumblr.com/post/113203981035/genderfree-contra-dance-term-faq

I have not updated it with gems / rubies.

I like jets / rubies, but I think gems / rubies is better:

1. I disagree that the "em" sound is harder to hear than the "et" in jet.
Good mic skills / having a foam pad on a mic will dull the sharp "ts" in
"gents", and thus, "jets". Because a loud "ts" on the mic is harsh.
Therefore, this argument against "gems" is not an issue.

2. A lot of people don't know "jet" is a gemstone, and so they think
airplane. I've had a lot of gender free dancers complain about this.  Given
that the terms need to serve the LGBTQ community, and not merely us as
callers, I take this complaint seriously. Thus, "gem" is a better choice.

3. Yes, a ruby is a gem. So what? They're both gems.

4. There's a gender connotation to thinking jet = airplane, since it's
either phallic, or people think the NY/NJ football team, or the West Side
Story fictional gang. Again, the terms are here to serve the dancers, not
merely us.

5. Gem has all the same advantages as jet.

I thus think gem / ruby is a superior pair than jet / ruby.

Ron Blechner
On May 29, 2015 11:32 AM, "Erik Hoffman via Callers" <
callers at lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:

> We are still using larks and ravens at the Berkeley dance. And, though I
> don't seem to have too much trouble using different words for different
> dances -- so far I've used men/women, ladies/gents, bands/bares,
> trees/squirrels, and larks/ravens without changing my mess of dance notes
> -- I understand that others can't switch so easily. On this note, at the
> Berkeley dance a caller recently did the following:
>
> 1) asked if anyone had some post-its. When found some
> 2) wrote "lark" and "raven" on the sticky end
> 3) cut out these little cheat-sheets
> 4) covered the words "gents" and "ladies" with the post-it cheats
> 5) move cheats to next card as needed
>
> Thereby changing their cards to the current words on the fly. I was
> impressed.
>
> ~erik hoffman
>     oakland, ca
>
> On 5/28/2015 8:01 PM, Kalia Kliban via Callers wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015, Alan Winston via Callers wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/28/15 12:30 PM, Ron Blechner via Callers wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For those interested in gender free contra dance terms:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Do you like or dislike jets / rubies ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Like. (I'm responding on personal preference alone; I'm aware of some
>>>> objections to this, which I don't personally share.)
>>>>
>>>>  2. How would gems / rubies compare?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Less good, because the soft "ms" would make the call less clear. Also,
>>>> rubies _are_ gems, so this is confusing.
>>>>
>>>
>> Me too.  I haven't yet tried calling with the jets and rubies
>> terminology, though I've used bands/bares and larks/ravens.  I can't say
>> I'm eager to add yet another set of translated cards to my files.
>> Kalia Kliban
>> _______________________________________________
>> Callers mailing list
>> Callers at lists.sharedweight.net
>> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers at lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20150529/7f2dcd64/attachment.htm>