[Callers] Difficulty rankings?

[Ron Blechner via Callers]

Indeed.

My original reply was merely speaking about relative difficulty of dances.
All of the subsequent posts have made good related points.
On Apr 20, 2015 6:13 PM, "Dugan Murphy via Callers" <
callers at lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:

> Hi Maia,
>
> I used to organize my dance cards by difficulty, but currently, I use
> categories in my box that are largely based on dance-defining figures
> (Petronella, star promenade) and types of progression (slide left,
> circle-pass-through).  I find that system of organization to be more useful
> when writing out a program for an evening.
>
> Dugan Murphy
> dugan at duganmurphy.com
>
>
> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 13:53:01 -0400
>> From: Maia McCormick via Callers <callers at lists.sharedweight.net>
>> To: "callers at lists.sharedweight.net" <callers at lists.sharedweight.net>
>> Subject: [Callers] Difficulty rankings?
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAHUcZGPHaCuWAZv+d+6EX1aJ7D25CDSvJUFD=
>> VLYV8g43Fyr6A at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> As I overhaul my contra deck and realize that my difficulty ranking system
>> is super incoherent, and most of my dance rankings are from way before I
>> had any idea what actually makes a dance easy or hard, I've been thinking
>> of scrapping this difficulty ranking system and just starting over. So I
>> was wondering: if you rank your dances by difficulty, what is your system,
>> what are your benchmarks for various difficulty levels, what sorts of
>> things do you consider when determining the difficulty of a dance? If you
>> DON'T
>> rank your dances, why not?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Maia
>>
>> ***************************************
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers at lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20150421/c42d4f0d/attachment.htm>