Understood, and I am sorry if my tone seemed harsh.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:58 PM, Don Veino<sharedweight_net@veino.com> wrote:Liz, that makes perfect sense in retrospect. However, many venues do not require testing for folks who remain masked and have had a "test in to unmask" approach for performers while on stage (where they were masked elsewhere and, until receiving a negative result, on stage as well).Greenfield's own central policy states:"Band members may unmask when on-stage for some series, but only if they have a negative rapid test on the day of the dance. Event publicity will clearly state whether performers may be unmasked at that specific event."Note there's no specific timeline stated there for when the testing shall happen other than it be on the day of.That's the point I'm raising from our recent experience.-DonI would have thought that anyone testing before attending or performing at a dance would determine that their test was actually negative before entering the hall and potentially exposing people.Liz Sturgen
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:46 PM, Don Veino via Organizers<organizers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:_______________________________________________For those of you with a COVID policy regarding testing (particularly re: performers "testing in" to be on stage unmasked) - please consider your lead time and possibilities for contingency action. We'll be changing the policy of our dance due to our experience tonight.
Our caller (me!) tested upon arrival at the hall. Entered masked, helped get set up going and then discovered a positive result. Thirty minutes to the first dance, folks already en route. Best efforts made, the dance was able to happen without me but just barely.
We will be requiring this optional testing now to happen within a specified period which will provide for sufficient time to react appropriately before the event set up commences.
Organizers mailing list -- organizers@lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to organizers-leave@lists.sharedweight.net