16 May
2016
16 May
'16
7:52 p.m.
Just in case there was any question, we have absolute trust in our
volunteers and have had no instances of door sitter cheating (a tiny
minority of dancers on the other hand... but I digress). The impetus for my
original investigation is solely operational efficiency - making it easier
for our volunteers and ourselves as organizers. It would be nice to
actually be able to dance at our own dances more often. :)
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Dan Pearl via Organizers <
organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
We operate on a basis of trust with our door-sitters
and the mix of
adult/youth varies during the year in unsurprising ways -- we just don't
feel like we need to capture that information.
4. Any system can be compromised by crooked door-sitter. They can wink at
their friends and wave them in for no fee. They could pocket some money
and not click the tally counter or put a tick-mark on the paper. Anything!