I want to highlight what David is saying, here.

I think it's a different standard to gauge by when a community is _trying out_ new terms. While I agree a long-term "caller's choice" doesn't best serve a community, I do think that a transition / trial period does make sense. And as long as terms are published in advance, why not?

Best regards,
Julian Blechner


On Mon, Oct 30, 2023, 5:41 PM David Kirchner via Organizers <organizers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I call in a community where the majority of callers use ladies/gents terminology, and I am pushing the envelope by using positional calling. We also have a caller who occasionally visits from elsewhere who routinely uses larks/robins and probably would choose not to come at all if they had to use ladies/gents. I think Don's point makes sense in communities where this has been a contentious issue. But here, nearly all dancers seem to be willing to roll with whatever as long as the calling is good quality. Organizers stepping in and making an across-the-board decision that enforces terminology would probably stifle the process of innovation, rather than encouraging it.

David
_______________________________________________
Organizers mailing list -- organizers@lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to organizers-leave@lists.sharedweight.net