Thanks Penelope, so far so good(ish).
Regarding the language, I plan on revising our policy to specify a deadline
of 4 hours before the event start time - hopefully sufficient to find
alternative talent in case of a positive result yet support timely data.
-Don
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 3:15 PM Penelope Weinberger <
pz_weinberger(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
And this is (part of) the insidious problem with an
often symptomless
disease. Of course if we test as a pro forma, we expect a negative result.
Don, I hope you come through quickly at remains a mild case.
------------------------------
*From:* Don Veino via Organizers <organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 20, 2022 1:57 PM
*To:* lsturgen(a)aol.com <lsturgen(a)aol.com>
*Cc:* Don Veino via Organizers <organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>et>; A
list for dance organizers <organizers(a)sharedweight.net>
*Subject:* [Organizers] Re: Performer "Testing to Unmask" Policy Timing
Liz, that makes perfect sense in retrospect. However, many venues do not
require testing for folks who remain masked and have had a "test in to
unmask" approach for performers while on stage (where they were masked
elsewhere and, until receiving a negative result, on stage as well).
Greenfield's own central policy states:
"Band members may unmask when on-stage for some series, but only if they
have a negative rapid test on the day of the dance. Event publicity will
clearly state whether performers may be unmasked at that specific event."
Note there's no specific timeline stated there for when the testing shall
happen other than it be on the day of.
That's the point I'm raising from our recent experience.
-Don
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:47 PM lsturgen(a)aol.com <lsturgen(a)aol.com> wrote:
I would have thought that anyone testing before attending or performing at
a dance would determine that their test was actually negative before
entering the hall and potentially exposing people.
Liz Sturgen
Sent from the all new AOL app for Android
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fplay.google.com%2Fstore%2Fapps%2Fdetails%3Fid%3Dcom.aol.mobile.aolapp&data=05%7C01%7C%7C6ff1ae49b3e845cfe67508dae2bc3737%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638071595257034436%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HVLrU2kg2l0ywfqQstuuiNd%2BIuEWIP1FAeWO2P1L%2F7s%3D&reserved=0>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:46 PM, Don Veino via Organizers
<organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
For those of you with a COVID policy regarding testing (particularly re:
performers "testing in" to be on stage unmasked) - please consider your
lead time and possibilities for contingency action. We'll be changing the
policy of our dance due to our experience tonight.
Our caller (me!) tested upon arrival at the hall. Entered masked, helped
get set up going and then discovered a positive result. Thirty minutes to
the first dance, folks already en route. Best efforts made, the dance was
able to happen without me but just barely.
We will be requiring this optional testing now to happen within a
specified period which will provide for sufficient time to react
appropriately before the event set up commences.
_______________________________________________
Organizers mailing list -- organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to organizers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net