Our community here in Tri Cities, WA, surveyed our dance community at the
end of 2021 in preparation to begin dancing again in 2022.  The majority of
the community did not reply.  Of those that did, about 50% preferred
restrictions & 50% preferred no restrictions.   Of those respondents 70%
said they would dance regardless of policy, as they would take the
precautions they needed to feel safe.   We talked about alternating dances,
restrictions one month  and non restrictions the next.
We ended up having 6 dances over the course of the year.  The first with
Vaccine requirements with masks optional - one line for masked and one line
for those not wearing a mask.  What we found is the majority danced in the
unmasked line.  Since our bands and callers were willing to play and call
with no restrictions, the following month we held a dance with no
restrictions, had masks and gloves available and went from there.  The
remaining dances had no restrictions - except that they were symptom free.
We always had masks, gloves and hand sanitizer available.    We had people
sign in with their email addresses and sent an email out a couple days
after each dance to ask anyone with symptoms to test and let us know
results so we could anonymously inform the rest of the dancers .   Only one
dance did we have anyone become sick and that was the day after, and they
tested negative and were better within a day or two.  So of those dances,
we had no reports of Covid contracted as a result of the dance.   So for
our community, this worked.   Out of concern for those that may not be
attending because of lack of restrictions, we sent out a message asking
them to let us know if they weren't coming due to lack of restrictions,
that we were wanting to accomodate all and willing to host restricted
dances and received no reply.    Our dances prior to Covid were minimally
attended, and the numbers remained the same when we started again in 2022
with no restrictions.
Joe, I agree with many of your perspectives, but I also respect
the perspectives of others that differ. I'm with those who spoke about
listening  to what your community wants and needs.     If you have a
contingent that wants dances without restrictions, is it possible that they
be given the opportunity to coordinate a dance if they can find bands and
callers willing, while keeping  the dances with restrictions for those that
need/want them in place as well?   It seems to me we can work together
meeting the needs/desires of all if resources and people are available and
willing. Or not?
Anyway, I just thought I'd put my 2 cents out there.
Best to all!
Terri
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:21 PM Joe Harrington via Organizers <
organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
  While I'm happy to comply with any COVID policy in
order to dance, and I
 choose to wear a mask at bigger events, I question whether the contra
 communities' strict policies are doing us much good, either in protecting
 us medically or in getting dances going again. Consider:
 1. Even in the most restricted states (New England, etc.), nearly everyone
 is maskless nearly all the time in normal life, including most dancers.
 People eat in very crowded restaurants, ride public transportation, fly on
 airplanes, sit in airports, go shopping, work, attend school, do sports, go
 to the gym, sing, interact with friends and family members who have been
 out in the community maskless, etc., mostly without masks.
 2. As a result of #1, covid is spreading quite effectively in our
 communities, even if a few groups are still masking.
 3. As a result of #2, protocols at a dance cannot much alter community
 spread rates, even if the dance spread rate were zero.
 But, this isn't concerning most people because:
 4. Vaccines do keep nearly every infected person out of the hospital and
 reduce long covid.
 5. For those going to the hospital or suspected to be at risk, monoclonal
 and other treatments are quite effective.
 6. As a result, the mortality of covid-19 is now down to three times that
 of a bad flu season, which is way down from the mass carnage of 2020.
 It is questionable what anything but masking is doing for us:
 7. Unmasked contra dancing, even with a vaccine and negative test, does
 lead to rapid covid spread. Several camps in summer 2022 had 50+ infected
 dancers, even though they were all vaccinated and all had tested negative
 on arrival. The incubation period and false-negative rate are enough to
 allow one or two cases through, and the vaccine no longer keeps you from
 getting it, it just dramatically reduces severity.
 Since:
 8. Even in the most conservative, vaccine-averse Southern communities,
 90+% of contra dancers at big events say they are vaccinated (per survey at
 Summer Contradancers Delight Holiday in Tennessee).
 9. Choosing to wear a mask remains an option for everyone, and is quite
 effective at keeping the wearer healthy, though it is not foolproof (but
 neither is life).
 And:
 10. People have options for recreational and social activities, and many
 are choosing those with fewer or no restrictions, especially young people
 who don't have much personal risk from covid.
 11. Essentially all other organized dance communities besides
 contra/English/etc. are dancing without restrictions on a national level,
 and have been since early 2022: Square, swing, blues, ballroom, salsa,
 tango, etc.
 It may therefore be time for communities to reconsider absolute
 restrictions, and instead encourage vaccination and mask-wearing as
 effective ways to stop the spread of diseases like covid, but also the flu,
 RSV, and other pathogens.
 People can still (and I do) choose to wear masks if they are concerned
 about getting covid. The idea of reducing spread at dances would be a good
 one if the rest of society were playing along. But, it isn't.  When I was a
 teen, I boycotted China. China didn't change.
 Communities with a large component of at-risk dancers who mask in general
 life and who are vaccinated may wish to continue requiring vax+mask.  In
 areas with many dancers, two dances, one requiring masks and one
 mask-optional, may make the most sense.
 I am especially concerned at the reduced percentage of younger dancers I
 have seen at recent events. While it seemed, prepandemic, that there was a
 nascent resurgence in the popularity of contra among the current
 twentysomethings, few of the young dancers I used to see are showing up to
 dances post-covid. When I go to swing and blues, there are lots of younger
 dancers.  I am certain that if we required masks at my college contra
 dance, students would just go to ballroom, salsa, or swing.
 If we want to get contra going again, and especially if we want to attract
 many new younger dancers, who are not worried that getting covid represents
 a big risk to them and who have plenty of unrestricted options in
 recreational activities, perhaps it's time not to ask, "does this policy
 stop covid from transmitting at our dance," but rather, "does this policy
 significantly lower the total covid risk our dancers face?"
 I argue that strict policies no longer do that, given our behavior in
 society.  Nonetheless, those of us who are concerned can still choose to
 reduce our own risk substantially by being vaccinated and wearing a
 well-fitting KN95 or better mask whenever we are in a crowd, including at
 dances, without requiring it of others.  I do.
 Thanks,
 --jh--
 Joe Harrington
 Organizer, Greater Orlando Contra Dance
 Faculty Advisor, Contra Knights, the UCF contra dancing club
 
contraknights.org
 FB, Ig: Contra Knights
 contradancerjoe(a)gmail.com
 _______________________________________________
 Organizers mailing list -- organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
 To unsubscribe send an email to organizers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net