I remember when, in my late 30s, all of us said we'd dance until we died,
even if it meant dancing in walkers. Of course we didn't have a clue
what that meant.
This was back in the '80s when the Atlanta dance was a fairly focused
age cohort:
vast majority of dancers between 30-45. That age cohort is now in their
60s and 70s.
Many have stopped dancing regularly.
I both appreciate "community" while at the same time acknowledge age issues
which affect dances.
A nearby dance, Sautee, has a twice a month Tuesday evening contra dance
that's
intended as a beginner's dance but, when I've gone, seems more an elder
beginner
(50 and 60 year old beginners) or elder-elder dance.
I believe that is the perfect spin off ...
a dance that is slower paced and easier to dance (simpler sequences).
I believe this issue (aging in general) is affecting our dances
and will just get more prominent and that a pro-active solution
is best.
Heitzso
For the last three years, one of our older dancers has
been declining with dementia--and her husband, not a good dancer himself, continues to
bring her to our dances. Invariably, they create chaos on the dance floor.
Most people on the board of my dance organization feel it's important to continue to
include these dancers until such time that the husband decides it's time for them to
stop coming. On the other hand, I'm concerned with the effect that they're having
on other dancers. I've heard at least one dancer say that she considered not coming to
a dance when she saw that this couple was there--and certainly this couple's presence
is diminishing the dance experience of many of the dancers who've come to our events
for the high level of dancing that we were able to deliver in the past.
Has anyone else wrestled with this sort of problem? If yes, what did you do (or not do)
about it?
Thanks,
Katy Heine
_______________________________________________
Organizers mailing list
Organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net