It is amazing how helpful new converts I mean dancers are and to ignore qualified personnel because they are not yet fully vetted could mean missing out on some good talent.
Qualifications and references are in order.
IMHO
Be well, Jeff

On Apr 26, 2016 5:16 PM, "via Organizers" <organizers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:

The situation is unclear to me. Is this person unqualified in some way?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 26, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Joe Kwiatkowski via Organizers <organizers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> It's annual election time, and a new dancer is answering the call to help the organization.
>
> The individual in question is someone known to a Board member and has "has served with other groups as funds manager/ treasurer type positions".  Using her talents, she has volunteered to lend them to the organization as Treasurer.
>
> This has sparked a battle among (1) we need to amend the by-laws so this can't happen, (2) we need to mentor new people into leadership, (3) we need to just vote at the general election and see what happens.
>
> A supporter of (1) claims that "that's what other clubs do".
>
> So without asking for the entire contra nation to take sides, let me ask you organizers: what would your club do/what does your club do to contend with or avoid situations such as this?
>
> Joe Kwiatkowski
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Organizers mailing list
> Organizers@lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Organizers mailing list
Organizers@lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net

_______________________________________________
Organizers mailing list
Organizers@lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net