5 Feb
2017
5 Feb
'17
5:52 p.m.
From both sides of the picture, I'm also
uncomfortable with the idea of
posting anything other than aggregated data (averages
for a significantly
large period) on performer pay. Particularly if the pay is determined in
some other way than straight percentage of revenue for an evening, you
could be setting yourself up with your talent and their sense of self-worth
- "why is Pat paid more than me?" Also, I feel there may be some
confidentiality issues here regarding disclosure of what a particular
person is paid.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Emily Addison via Organizers <
organizers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Re communicating what talent pays... not trying to
hide that at all.
We've just never communicated that. I think it's mostly because as a
whole, our committee didn't think there was a reason. And there are likely
a few who might still feel a little uncomfortable. (I'll have to ask.)