I was the booker for a dance for a bunch of years and saying no was one of the more challenging responsibilities that came with the role. It's hard because you are basically evaluating someone's creative effort, something they are presumably quite hopeful and invested in.
Of course, beware of burning bridges.. 10 years later they could be a
big draw name, or at least good enough, and the only one available
when your scheduled caller comes down with ebola.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Jeff Kaufman via Organizers
<organizers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> When you're handling booking for bands or callers, there are generally some
> proper you don't want to book. When the reason is straightforward it's not
> too hard to communicate ("you need to get more experience; play some smaller
> dances and get back to me" or "on even days our series only books local
> callers, ago the dates you suggested don't work, but what about DATE?") but
> sometimes the reason is "we don't think you're very good, and you've been
> doing enough dances that we don't think booking you for ours will help you
> improve"? I'd like to just say "no" without getting into reasons, but
> everything I write sounds either too short and curt or overshary.
>
> How do other bookers handle this?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Organizers mailing list
> Organizers@lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net
>
_______________________________________________
Organizers mailing list
Organizers@lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net