Sorry for the delayed response, I've been on something of an internet fast.

Regarding:

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:44 PM, John Sweeney via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Hi Angela,
[snip]
        The “Hole in the Wall Crossing” is not a new move.  It is a stylised version of a normal Cross Over.

[snip]
        There are countless contra dances already with moves like: Balance the Ring; Ladies Cross.

        You just do the crossing in that style and you are doing a “Hole in the Wall Crossing”.  You don’t need to write new dances, just give the dancers that stylistic option. 

I agree with John in a geographic destination sense.

However, unless I'm misunderstanding his point, I apparently differ in opinion as regards timing and flow. I believe you definitely need to address the "styling" of the cross within the rest of the dance's choreography - meaning the composition must be fit to a HitW-style cross or risk the dance not being satisfying.

A "conventional" [persons identifier] cross by [shoulder] (or alternatively [persons identifier] swap) can range from 2 (rushed) to 4 (typical) beats. A HitW-styled cross would typically run 6-8 beats. As a result, the proximate moves (or "styling" of them) must address that timing for the overall dance to be satisfying.

By way of example, consider this one of mine:

  The Whole Slice – Becket – Don Veino 20170401
  
  A1
  (4,4) Slice Forward on left diagonal, Fall Straight Back
  (8!) Hole in the Wall* (with N straight across – “Go Forward, Neighbor Swap, Fall Back”), look away from Partner
  
  A2
  (6) Circle Left 3/4 (w/same N & your shadow)
  (10) Neighbor Swing
  
  B1
  (8) Left Diagonal Ladies Chain (to P)
  (8) Half Hey Ladies Pass Right (straight across)
  
  B2
  (4,12) Partner Balance & Swing
  
  (*Choreographic shorthand - I don't call with this term - see full details at http://veino.com/blog/?p=1541)

If the caller decided to do a "conventionally styled" swap instead of "HitW styled" to end the A1, there's ~4 beats difference that'd need to be dealt with. Dancers might hold their place smiling or (more likely) do something unintended instead - possibly disrupting the rest of the dance. Bottom line, one can't just "style" that single bit without addressing the other parts.

FWIW, this is why the A1 and A2 above are crafted as they are... the slice demonstrates similar cadence to the HitW cross timing.  It'd take all 4 dancers shaking that off and then rushing the HitW cross for the circle to start early (vs. a 2 dancer move, with proportionately greater risk of mis-timing) - this was intended as a "point of control" to smooth things out and help dancers settle into the relaxed (for contra) cadence.

-Don