Import1

import1@lists2.sharedweight.net

2524 discussions

by Tom Hinds via Callers

Looks new to me. How about a little change: A1 Left gypsy neighbor (or allemande) 1 1/2 Next neighbor right gypsy (or allemande) 1 1/2 A2 Next neighbor left gypsy once Swing second gypsy. T On Apr 18, 2016, at 3:53 PM, Andy Shore via Callers wrote: > from a dance-writing session led by Jeff Spero at a recent dance > camp... > > > This Was Your Idea > by John Kelley, John Bartlett, Sandy Gabucan, Andy Shore > Contra/ Duple Improper > > A1 ----------- > (8) Gypsy Neighbor1 Right 1.5 > (8) Gypsy Neighbor2 Left 1.5 > A2 -----------. > (8) Gypsy Neighbor3 Right 1x come back ... > (8) Neighbor2 swing > B1 ----------- > (4) Give & Take to Lady's Side > (12) Partner swing > B2 ----------- > (8) Right and left through > (8) Balance the ring and spin to the right (petronella) to face N2 > >

8 years, 8 months

[Callers] New (?) dance, with hey and no neighbor swing

by Luke Donforth via Callers

Hello all, I was flying home after some fun gigs in DC, and wrote out a dance sequence that I didn't recognize. It's fairly straightforward, so I wanted to see if it was already out there: Improper A1 (8) Neighbor Do-si-do 1x (8) Women allemande Left 1.5x A2 (16) Partner pass by Right for whole Hey for 4 B1 (16) Partner ____ & swing B2 (8) Ladies chain (8) Left hand star 1x The B1 could be a balance and swing, a do-si-do & swing, a walk-around & swing, etc. In the one I wrote, I went with a walk-around by right shoulder; but if someone had already written this with a Ptr B&S or such in the the B1; I wouldn't consider this a new dance. I house-called it for a small test group, and it went reasonably. The DSD only 1x in (8) and the overall flow means there can be a smidge of extra time by the end of the hey; hence going with a walk-around instead of a balance. Could also just be done to a slightly faster tune (I had music-in-a-box, instead of the easier to adjust tempo of live musicians). Looking forward to finding out if I've re-written someone else's dance again. I've unintentionally done it more times than I can count. Take care, -- Luke Donforth Luke.Donforth(a)gmail.com <Luke.Donev(a)gmail.com>

8 years, 8 months

[Callers] A2 progressions (WAS: does this dance exist?)

by Ric Goldman - Letsdance via Callers

On a completely different subject, I’ve recently heard term “mid-life crisis” used to describe dance that progress in the middle like this one. Has anyone else come across the term? Curious, Ric Goldman From: Callers [mailto:callers-bounces@lists.sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Andy Shore via Callers Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 12:53 PM To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net> Subject: [Callers] does this dance exist? (Sent this to Chris Page a week ago and no answer!.. so I'm asking the hive mind.) Using the G-word until there's a widely accepted substitute that doesn't need a footnote to explain. from a dance-writing session led by Jeff Spero at a recent dance camp... This Was Your Idea by John Kelley, John Bartlett, Sandy Gabucan, Andy Shore Contra/ Duple Improper A1 ----------- (8) Gypsy Neighbor1 Right 1.5 (8) Gypsy Neighbor2 Left 1.5 A2 -----------. (8) Gypsy Neighbor3 Right 1x come back ... (8) Neighbor2 swing B1 ----------- (4) Give & Take to Lady's Side (12) Partner swing B2 ----------- (8) Right and left through (8) Balance the ring and spin to the right (petronella) to face N2 Note that the progression happens in A2. The Petronella into a (right shoulder) Gypsy seems unusual. I don't have any dances in my collection that do that. Dancing it with a test group seemed to be fine. Thoughts? -- /Andy Shore http://site.andyshore.com/ best email - andyshore(a)gmail.com <mailto:andyshore@gmail.com>

8 years, 8 months

[Callers] does this dance exist?

by Andy Shore via Callers

(Sent this to Chris Page a week ago and no answer!.. so I'm asking the hive mind.) Using the G-word until there's a widely accepted substitute that doesn't need a footnote to explain. from a dance-writing session led by Jeff Spero at a recent dance camp... This Was Your Idea by John Kelley, John Bartlett, Sandy Gabucan, Andy Shore Contra/ Duple Improper A1 ----------- (8) Gypsy Neighbor1 Right 1.5 (8) Gypsy Neighbor2 Left 1.5 A2 -----------. (8) Gypsy Neighbor3 Right 1x come back ... (8) Neighbor2 swing B1 ----------- (4) Give & Take to Lady's Side (12) Partner swing B2 ----------- (8) Right and left through (8) Balance the ring and spin to the right (petronella) to face N2 Note that the progression happens in A2. The Petronella into a (right shoulder) Gypsy seems unusual. I don't have any dances in my collection that do that. Dancing it with a test group seemed to be fine. Thoughts? -- /Andy Shore http://site.andyshore.com/ best email - andyshore(a)gmail.com

8 years, 8 months

[Callers] medley

by Laur via Callers

I'm debating if 6 or 8 times thru the dances during a medley make more sense. I've gone back and forth on this for years. Thoughts? If it matters this time I have 8 dances, in the past it's been 5. So either way it's still the same question. Laurie West Mi ~ When I dance, I cannot judge, I cannot hate, I cannot separate myself from life. I can only be joyful and whole, that is why I dance. ~Hans Bos~ ~

8 years, 8 months

Re: [Callers] medley

by Aahz Maruch via Callers

[the message I'm responding to was sent privately, I got permission to respond publicly] On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, Rod and Chris Krehbiel wrote: > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 10:12 AM, Aahz Maruch via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, Laur via Callers wrote: >>> >>> I'm debating if 6 or 8 times thru the dances during a medley make more >>> sense. I've gone back and forth on this for years. Thoughts? >> >> That depends on your goal. I'm hearing-impaired, I dislike medleys in >> the first place, they combine the worst of contra and square dancing. >> For me, more times through is better, gives me more chance to dance >> trance. > > Since I have a goal of combining the BEST of contra and square dance, > I'm intrigued by your comment that medleys combine the worst of contra > and square dance. Could you expand and explain? The short version is that contra dance callers on average enunciate less clearly than square dance callers, contra calling in general assumes that they're calling under the music rather than over the music the way square dance callers do (or calling when no music is playing -- the walkthrough), sound engineering in contra halls emphasizes the music, contra dancers have much less training in responding to live calling, and contra vocabulary/grammar has less structure than square dance. Therefore -- and particularly for hearing-impaired people -- contra medleys represent a challenge that almost always combines the worst of square dance (live calling) with the worst of contra (poor ability to hear the calling). Obviously, it would be possible to combine the best of contra and square dance, but WRT hearing impairments, it would pretty much need to be approached from the square dance side (i.e. focusing on the voice and then working to get the dancers to follow the musical phrasing the way contra dancers do). -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html

8 years, 8 months

[Callers] Medleys

by Rod and Chris Krehbiel via Callers

I am assuming that a 'medley' in contra dancing means that the band will play a series of different songs--usually 3--in immediate succession with no noticeable break between them, but that the dancers will continue to dance the same figure that they began with the walk-thru. And that once the dancers have 'mastered' that figure, they eventually will not need any further verbal cues from the caller, even though the music changes. Is that correct, or do some have a different definition of "medley"?

8 years, 8 months

[Callers] No walk thru

by Laur via Callers

blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Looking for new ideas. No walk through at a dance weekend level. Ideas? ESP open to switching opportunities.. Laurie West MI Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

8 years, 9 months

[Callers] Challenging Contras

by Playford1651 via Callers

You might like to try this one! Pink Pigtails by John Meechan Longways improper double progression 48 bar jigs (has own tune which I can send if you would like it) A1 Circle left (8); swing nbr (8). A2 Mad Robin men front of women (8); men start half hey passing RSh while women start the hey but ricochet back to place (8). B1 Balance and swing ptnr. B2 Take hands and balance the ring and Petronella a place (8); balance the ring again and California twirl ptnr to face new nbr (8). C1 Do si do new nbr once and a bit to form a wave (8); balance the wave and trade the wave (8). C2 Balance the wave again and trade the wave (8); balance the wave again and move on to a new nbr (8). Trade the wave is a MWSD move. In the wave you are facing the same direction as your partner. All walk forward to trade places with partner ( women on the inside), i.e a sort of U shape. Hope this suitable for you. The challenge is not only that it is a 48 bar dance but has the trade the wave move. The dance was written for Maureen Knight (my wife) on her 60th birthday. Graham

8 years, 9 months

Re: [Callers] Challenging contras

by tavi merrill via Callers

Bradley, The first and third dances in this video playlist may fit your bill.

8 years, 9 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

Import1