I’m not sure “circulate” is a common enough move in contra that you have to worry about using the call differently, though it is becoming more common. And correspondingly, I’d say “partial circulate” will hardly be helpful at all. I think you could say “circulate to a wave” the first couple of times, and then “circulate t’wave” as needed. (Teach it, of course, with more words than that, and tell them you’re going to call it “circulate to a wave.” Maybe point out during teaching that if you’re facing in you go to the wave, if you’re facing out you turn and stay on the outside—that way you don’t have to call “circulate to a ladies’ wave”/“circulate to a gents’ wave.")
Read Weaver
Jamaica Plain, MA
http://lcfd.org
> On May 17, 2018, at 2:09 PM, Jack Mitchell via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> What would you call a circulate like this? Would it be a partial circulate? Or, in the interest of not adding any more terminology, since only half of the people are going to end up in a wave after each one, would it be better to just say "ladies take 4 steps forward to a long wave of ladies, gents face in", etc?
>
> A1 Balance Wave
> Circulate (Gents Loop, ladies take 4 steps forward) to a long wave of ladies
> Balance Wave of Ladies
> Circulate (ladies walk forward and face in, gents take 4 steps forward) to a long wave of gents
>
> A2 Balance Wave of Gents
> Gents step forward – N Sw
>
> --
> Jack Mitchell
> Durham, NC
On Thu, May 17, 2018, Jack Mitchell via Callers wrote:
>
> What would you call a circulate like this? Would it be a partial
> circulate? Or, in the interest of not adding any more terminology, since
> only half of the people are going to end up in a wave after each one, would
> it be better to just say "ladies take 4 steps forward to a long wave of
> ladies, gents face in", etc?
>
> *A1* Balance Wave
> Circulate (Gents Loop, ladies take 4 steps forward) to a long wave
> of ladies
> Balance Wave of Ladies
> Circulate (ladies walk forward and face in, gents take 4 steps
> forward) to a long wave of gents
>
> *A2* Balance Wave of Gents
> Gents step forward ??? N Sw
Not picturing the starting formation, so it's a bit difficult for me to
figure out what you want, but it's certainly the case that MWSD (Modern
Western Square Dancing) allows partial circulates (e.g. "Box Circulate
1 1/2" -- which typically produces exactly the formation you're
describing). If your starting formation is long waves BGBG up/down the
hall, thinking of each group of four as a box gives you the typical MWSD
starting formation for "Box Circulate 1 1/2".
I also note that MWSD has no direct equivalent to your circulate from the
wave of ladies ("promenade" could be used because it requires a face in
afterward, but it's a rarely-used gimmick) -- I would normally use two
calls to achieve the effect you want ("diamond circulate and ladies face
in").
Dunno how best to describe this using contra terminology.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html
Thanks to Nick & the others that were in touch with me by email.
I think you all have provided great starting points which I will pass along
to the parents and, presumably, on to the offspring in the strawberry patch.
Regards,
Ken
What would you call a circulate like this? Would it be a partial
circulate? Or, in the interest of not adding any more terminology, since
only half of the people are going to end up in a wave after each one, would
it be better to just say "ladies take 4 steps forward to a long wave of
ladies, gents face in", etc?
*A1* Balance Wave
Circulate (Gents Loop, ladies take 4 steps forward) to a long wave
of ladies
Balance Wave of Ladies
Circulate (ladies walk forward and face in, gents take 4 steps
forward) to a long wave of gents
*A2* Balance Wave of Gents
Gents step forward – N Sw
--
Jack Mitchell
Durham, NC
I live in Merced (about 40 or so miles SE of Modesto), and know folks
who know folks. Most of the folks I know in this area are more
Bluegrass-oriented than northern.
Modesto is a good 100 or so miles east of SF/Palo Alto/Berkeley, and
about as far from Sacramento. <info(a)sactocds.org> may be the best
starting contact for the Sacramento area; folks currently in the bay
area should have better contacts than I do these day.
--Nick
On 05/16/2018 11:56 AM, K Panton via Callers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not a member of the musicians list and I may have success here,
> hence this post.
>
> A client informed me that his 20-something daughter - fiddler since 5
> - had moved to Modesto, CA a year ago and not yet linked in with a
> community of musicians. She has apparently sat in with the Old Sod
> Band here in Ottawa at some point for a dance. I've not met her.
>
> At this point, having recently started a new job, she may not be
> actively seeking musical contacts. Nonetheless, if anyone can suggest
> a contact for her - Bay area? Sacramento? Alvin, Yogi, Smoky in
> Yosemite? - which I can pass along, I would be happy to do so.
>
> Ken Panton
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Callers mailing list
> List Address: Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/
Hi all,
I'm not a member of the musicians list and I may have success here, hence
this post.
A client informed me that his 20-something daughter - fiddler since 5 - had
moved to Modesto, CA a year ago and not yet linked in with a community of
musicians. She has apparently sat in with the Old Sod Band here in Ottawa
at some point for a dance. I've not met her.
At this point, having recently started a new job, she may not be actively
seeking musical contacts. Nonetheless, if anyone can suggest a contact for
her - Bay area? Sacramento? Alvin, Yogi, Smoky in Yosemite? - which I can
pass along, I would be happy to do so.
Ken Panton
I agree with John Sweeney, but it all depends.
For a large group of beginners, rather than spending time
explaining the advantage of having an experienced partner or trying to
split beginners up,
the simple solution is have a dance where they don't swing together.
like:
Easier Than Pie by Billy Boyer
Essex Reel by Tony Parkes
First Star by Ted Steele
Open Rehearsal by Jacob Bloom
Paul's Fishing Reel by Jim Gregory
Saturday Night Reel by Herbie Gaudreau
Sunrise Jig by Shelly Jenkins
I usually limit it to one dance, but it depends.
Then there is the 'almost' situation where only the 1s or 2s swing.
It has the same risk of 'disappointing' the dedicated swingers.
like:
Alternating Corners by Jim Kitch
Boiling Mud by Greg Byrne
Three's Company by Paul Balliet
and quite a few others.
Then there is the case where there is so much going on in the dance,
that there just isn't
anywhere to fit in a partner swing.
like:
The Thirty-Fourth of October by Bob Archer
Divided Star by Don Armstrong
and other dances already mentioned.
But I grant you, I can't think of a reason I would call one of these,
when there are so many other better dances...
But then there is the argument that as a change of pace,
with an interesting dance, most people won't really notice.
But it's got to be a dynamite dance, or after dances with long partner
swings.
As Grocho Marx once quipped, "...but I take [my cigar] out of my mouth
every once in a while."
Bill
Rich Sbardella via Callers wrote:
> I cannot recall dancing a modern contra in the last few years that
> does not include a Partner Swing, so I have a few questions.
>
> First, do you call any such modern dances without a partner swing?
> Why or why not?
>
> Second, if you do, do you announce it before the preceding dance so as
> to inform those pairs of dancer that love to swing together?
>
> The Tease by Tom Hinds is one such creative dance that begs to be called.
>
> Rich Sbardella,
> Stafford, CT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Callers mailing list
> List Address: Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
One dance I do call occasionally is Eric Hoffman’s Last Swing of Summer. I like it because there's a couple do-si-do 1 1/2 times with your partner, so I always comment to people that as long as they are aware of their neighbors, they have 16 counts with their partner and they should use the time wisely. Some people actually swing their way around the other couple. Some people decide to face as in a pousette, some twirl and flourish through the figure, and some just do it plain. It’s also easy and good for a less experienced crowd.
Martha
> On May 13, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Rich Sbardella via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> I cannot recall dancing a modern contra in the last few years that does not include a Partner Swing, so I have a few questions.
>
> First, do you call any such modern dances without a partner swing? Why or why not?
>
> Second, if you do, do you announce it before the preceding dance so as to inform those pairs of dancer that love to swing together?
>
> The Tease by Tom Hinds is one such creative dance that begs to be called.
>
> Rich Sbardella,
> Stafford, CT
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Callers mailing list
> List Address: Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/
Hi All,
I am asking for a friend, who is looking for a square caller for a
wedding on 9/22, in Estes Park, Colorado.
I don't have any other details, but if anyone is interested I will forward
your response.
Thank you,
Dereck
Dereck Kalish
Director NEFFA
Sound Committee
Thursday Night Dance Committee, Chair (Concord, Ma)
dereckkalish(a)gmail.com
*Upcoming Contra Dance Calling appearances...*
Manchester, Nh Friday 5/18
Rehoboth, Ma Friday 5/25
Conventry, Ct Friday 6/1
Berlin, Ma Saturday 6/2
.