Anything that gets a laugh is more likely to be remembered. I've heard
folks (Adina Gordon comes to mind) say something like: "If there's no one
on your left diagonal... (dramatic pause) ...for the love of God, don't do
anything!" Still don't have a particularly good way to get folks back IN on
a diagonal though, eagerly following this thread for that!
I *will* mention a bit of advice I got (believe it was from the esteemed
Will Mentor) on calling new/old neighbor figures: and that's to avoid use
of the phase "go BACK to your..." because to many that implies backwards
motion and generally folks will be walking forward, and you only perceive
that direction as "back" if you have a pretty well-developed sense of
contra geography. Instead, say something like "return". I also find it
useful, in this cases, to give the players funny and memorable names other
than "current neighbor" and "next neighbor"--like maybe your "one true
neighbor"?
Cheers,
Maia
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 8:27 AM, K Panton via Callers <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Thanks to all for the ideas.
>
> Special thanks to Maia!
>
> If anyone has insights into teaching diagonal figures to the uninitiated
> I'd love to hear them.
>
> Ken
>
> On Oct 10, 2016 12:36, "K Panton" <panton90(a)tricolour.queensu.ca> wrote:
>
>> 3-33-33 is not a good choice for introducing beginners to extra-4some
>> expeditions. I've also found that a diagonal chain followed by a
>> straight-across figure causes confusion.
>>
>> The Young Adult Rose,and others, have a pass-through to shadow allemande
>> which is doable.
>>
>> Does anyone have some reliable key to unlock this mystery for new
>> dancers, thereby opening up a whole new world!
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ken
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
>
Thanks to all for the ideas.
Special thanks to Maia!
If anyone has insights into teaching diagonal figures to the uninitiated
I'd love to hear them.
Ken
On Oct 10, 2016 12:36, "K Panton" <panton90(a)tricolour.queensu.ca> wrote:
> 3-33-33 is not a good choice for introducing beginners to extra-4some
> expeditions. I've also found that a diagonal chain followed by a
> straight-across figure causes confusion.
>
> The Young Adult Rose,and others, have a pass-through to shadow allemande
> which is doable.
>
> Does anyone have some reliable key to unlock this mystery for new dancers,
> thereby opening up a whole new world!
>
> Thanks
>
> Ken
>
Millstone or "windmill" - term I've seen used in print for older Canadian dances.
Bob Livingston
From: Angela DeCarlis via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
To: Jacob or Nancy Bloom <jandnbloom(a)gmail.com>
Cc: callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Callers] Wrist-Lock Stars
I've never heard "millstone" or "mill" before, but it sounds like it has precedence. My guess is that it was (is?) a useful term at dances where hands-across stars are default. Since that isn't generally the case in many places any longer, it makes sense that "hands-across" has become the more useful modifier.
On Oct 10, 2016 11:37 AM, "Jacob or Nancy Bloom via Callers" <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
When I attended the Berea Christmas Dance School forty years ago, and put my hand on the wrist in front of me during a walk through, someone complained, saying, "He said a star, not a mill!"
Is the term "mill", or the term "millstone", commonly used to refer to wrist stars in areas where hands-across is the default way of doing a star?
Jacob Bloom
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jerome Grisanti via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight. net> wrote:
I agree with Chet that Louisville's default star is hands-across, although weekend festivals in nearby cities tend toward the millstone star. I avoid the terms wrist-lock or even wrist-grip star, as I prefer the fingers to lay atop the adjoining wrist without using the thumb to "grip" in any way.
The Midwest where I dance/call now is pretty solidly wrist-star territory (St. Louis, Columbia MO, Kansas City, Lawrence). When I call one-night events (parties, weddings), I dictate hands-across stars, but when calling for an established contra community I ask for the default.
--Jerome
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0858
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
"Whatever you do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius and power and magic in it." --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:31 AM, John Sweeney via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.ne t> wrote:
Hi all,
I have been to contra dances and festivals all over America and
everywhere I have danced everyone automatically uses a wrist-lock star
(unless the caller has specified hands-across because of the subsequent
choreography).
But I am constantly challenged in England by people claiming that
wrist-lock stars are not the standard in America.
When I go to somewhere like The Flurry and see 600 people from all
over the country all doing wrist-locks it seems to me that it must be the
standard way of doing things.
And obviously it has been common in America for a long time; this
video is from 1964 in Northern Vermont and shows wrist-lock stars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=pZubTju7g_s
So, are there still significant communities that don't use
wrist-locks?
Is the wrist-lock the de facto standard?
Thanks.
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 & 07802
940 574
http://www.modernjive.com for Modern Jive Events & DVDs
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
______________________________ _________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/ listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedwei ght.net
______________________________ _________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/ listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedwei ght.net
--
jandnbloom@gmail.comhttp://jacobbloom.net/
______________________________ _________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/ listinfo.cgi/callers- sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
With more experience I've become very sensitive to when to use dances that
include out-of-set action. For me, once you get to something like ~20% of
the hall being "new", I likely won't include any out of set dances in the
first half (second half, only if things are going well).
Cal and Irene by Dan Pearl is one I do use a fair bit when introducing out
of set action:
A1
(16) N Bal., & Swing (SHDW on Lt. Diag. while facing in)
A2
(2,6) N Slide Lt., Cir. Lt. 3/4 (SHDW in this Cir./Ring)
(4,4) Ring Bal., N Calif. Twirl
B1
(16) P Bal., & Swing
B2
(8) Rt. & Lt. Thru **OR** P Prom. Across
(6,2) Cir. Lt. 3/4, Pass Thru Up/Dn
The parts are basic and common earlier in a program. The CA Twirl to face P
is an AHA! moment. I now stress that the A2 Circle is NOT with your Partner
(but you'll come back to them) in the teaching. I can vividly remember a
dancer that repeatedly "fixed" that circle to be with their P every time
through the dance, breaking it for those around them. Call coaching didn't
work, I had to get on the floor and "twin" them once through the dance to
convince them it was OK to separate.
I've recently come up with the following, which I've had luck with under
similar conditions, as you excurse and return with your Partner:
(I'll Take) What's Behind Door #2 - DI - Don Veino 20160822
A1
Star Right
Neighbor Allemande Rt. 1+1/2
A2
Next Neighbors Star Left
Original (A1 Allemande) Neighbor Swing
B1
Circle Left 3/4, Partner Swing
[alt. music fit: Give and Take to Gent's Side, Swing]
B2 (Author preferred)
Ring/4 Balance, Slide/Twirl Right 1x
Neighbor Left Hand Balance, Pull By Up/Down (leisurely)
B2 (Easier alternate)
Ring/4 Balance, Slide/Twirl Right 1x
Ring/4 Balance, Pass Through Up/Down
Written to match with the tune Door County #2 by Larry Unger, but fits with
other old timey or common tunes.
-Don
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:36 PM, K Panton via Callers <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> 3-33-33 is not a good choice for introducing beginners to extra-4some
expeditions. I've also found that a diagonal chain followed by a
straight-across figure causes confusion.
>
> The Young Adult Rose,and others, have a pass-through to shadow allemande
which is doable.
>
> Does anyone have some reliable key to unlock this mystery for new
dancers, thereby opening up a whole new world!
>
> Thanks
>
> Ken
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
<http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net>
>
John,
Somewhere south of Asheville and leading west possibly into the lower Midwest, is the land of hands across stars. They are standard in Atlanta, the heart of hands-across-land.
Andrea
Sent from my external brain
> On Oct 10, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Dave Casserly via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> Jeff Kaufman wrote a paper on regional variations in contra dance. Here's what he found for wrist-grip stars (page 31 of the link). Basically, they're common everywhere in the US except in some parts of the South. This is based on data from ten or more years ago, so I'm not sure if that's still true. I would not be surprised if it isn't-- there's enough cross-contamination that wrist-grips could have taken over even in the South. We do have people from Georgia and North Carolina on the list; hopefully they'll chime in.
>
> -Dave
> Washington, DC
>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:31 AM, John Sweeney via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I have been to contra dances and festivals all over America and
>> everywhere I have danced everyone automatically uses a wrist-lock star
>> (unless the caller has specified hands-across because of the subsequent
>> choreography).
>>
>> But I am constantly challenged in England by people claiming that
>> wrist-lock stars are not the standard in America.
>>
>> When I go to somewhere like The Flurry and see 600 people from all
>> over the country all doing wrist-locks it seems to me that it must be the
>> standard way of doing things.
>>
>> And obviously it has been common in America for a long time; this
>> video is from 1964 in Northern Vermont and shows wrist-lock stars:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZubTju7g_s
>>
>> So, are there still significant communities that don't use
>> wrist-locks?
>>
>> Is the wrist-lock the de facto standard?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Happy dancing,
>> John
>>
>> John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 & 07802
>> 940 574
>> http://www.modernjive.com for Modern Jive Events & DVDs
>> http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Callers mailing list
>> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
>
>
> --
> David Casserly
> (cell) 781 258-2761
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
Cheat or swing in a square.
On Oct 10, 2016, at 12:36 PM, K Panton via Callers wrote:
> 3-33-33 is not a good choice for introducing beginners to
> extra-4some expeditions. I've also found that a diagonal chain
> followed by a straight-across figure causes confusion.
>
> The Young Adult Rose,and others, have a pass-through to shadow
> allemande which is doable.
>
> Does anyone have some reliable key to unlock this mystery for new
> dancers, thereby opening up a whole new world!
>
> Thanks
>
> Ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
Here in Oklahoma I call it a wagon-wheel grip, but I think I picked up that term in either Michigan or California when I was starting to dance contra circa 2008. Wagon-wheel stars are the default in OK/TX/KS/MO local dances, and also seem standard in the SF Bay Area.
When I teach a star in a room with a lot of new dancers, I say “our convention here is to make a wagon-wheel in the middle — your hand should be on the wrist of the person in front of you.” Our intro workshops usually speak to the question of grip (nothing the other person can’t get out of wordlessly without injury, please), so we don’t generally get people who are gripping tightly.
Incidentally, I enjoy the wagon wheel as a moment when experienced dancers can help new dancers have an “ah ha!” moment without disrupting my teaching. It’s a neat opportunity to introduce the concept of dancers being able to learn details of technique from each other, which I hope then continues throughout the evening.
Louise
(Stillwater, OK)
Please change your address book to use Mark Widmer's new email address:
widmermt98(a)gmail.com
The old email address (mark(a)harbormist.com) will be going away soon.
I've had issues with the combination of box the gnat and pull by. I'd
be hesitant to use that combination for a group with a lot of beginners.
Kalia Kliban (who also posted about Another Nice Combination but forgot
to sign it)
On 10/10/2016 10:30 AM, Meg Dedolph via Callers wrote:
> I like this one a lot:
>
> /Becky's Brouhaha - Rhiannon (Giddens) Laffan />//>/A1 N Bal and Box
> the Gnat, Pull by R, (Previous N) Allemande L />/A2 (Current) N B&S
> />/B1 Circle L 3/4, P Sw />/B2 Ladies Chain, Left Hand Star/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:36 AM K Panton via Callers
> <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> wrote:
>
> 3-33-33 is not a good choice for introducing beginners to extra-4some
> expeditions. I've also found that a diagonal chain followed by a
> straight-across figure causes confusion.
>
> The Young Adult Rose,and others, have a pass-through to shadow
> allemande which is doable.
>
> Does anyone have some reliable key to unlock this mystery for new
> dancers, thereby opening up a whole new world!
>
> Thanks
>
> Ken
>
> _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> <mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net>
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
Not sure how I came by it, but I call them "pack saddle" stars when I teach
beginners ("wrist-lock", no). "Raise your right hand, put it in the center
and now lay it on the wrist of the person in front of you, like a pack
saddle on a horse, to make a star. Notice you don't need to clamp on or
even really use your thumb at all."
And yes, very much the default star form from my experience.