Adam,

I guess Google is Too Hard for some?

Re: evocative nature of terms.
"Box the gnat", "hey", "chain", etc all aren't evocative, either. Swing may be. I love how "right shoulder round" is self explanatory.

I want to underline the excellent point you made about rhyming. "Oh, we can't SAY that word, but we'll think it. Wink."

Best,
Ron

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 9:57 AM Adam Carlson <adam_carlson@pobox.com> wrote:
Ron,

I was halfway through a long, researched response explaining why it is a slur, why just because a particular caller hasn't been personally confronted at one of their dances they shouldn't assume it's not, and why the origins of the term, while pertinent are not the whole story on how we should approach it today when Isaac, in one short paragraph, provided a much more effective response than mine would ever be. In researching I was pleasantly surprised by number of good references in the wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_the_Romani_people. I found it by googling "gypsy usage as a slur" which also turned up a lot of useful material.

I'd love to see your article when you're done.

BTW, I'm really saddened that the term "right shoulder round" has become the standard replacement for gypsy. It's about as evocative as "modified ballroom position paired rotation" is for swing and takes too long to say. I really liked pixie when it was popular, just because I like the word, and I like two-eye turn, though it doesn't make much sense unless you know what a two-hand turn is, which many contra dancers don't these days. (Pixie doesn't make any sense, but it doesn't purport to.) I've never tried Look-See, which is appealing, but maybe too cute by half, and I fear won't come across well on PAs. Though pixie and look-see are both phonetic references back to gypsy. They just rhyme, so it's a way of referring back to the tainted word. It'd be like if someone who was racist but didn't want to offend people with the N word went around talking about "those jiggers".

Cheers,
Adam

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 7:56 AM Ron Blechner via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I am working on a shared document, if only because it takes a lot of time and work to educate people and I'd like a resource with lots of links that people can easily share. If you'd like to positively contribute, please email me directly contraron at gmail dot com.

It's the 21st century. We're smart people who love history, right? 

"G*psy" has its etymology back to mistaking olive-skinned peoples from India and Persia for Egyptians. It's _always_ been a racial term, and it's always been a slang that was put on Romany. While some groups have reclaimed the term, this is not the majority, and, like f*ggot to LGBTQ people, or the N word to Africans and African Americans, the word simply isn't white people's word, even if someone has "given you permission" to use it.

When Cecil Sharp introduced it, so far research I've seen shows he didn't use "gip" it in the racial sense. It was a Morris dance word that had no roots in Romance languages. Sometime after in the 20th century, probably because of homonym confusion, other callers and dancers assumed it was "g*psy".

Romancing nomadicism:
So, y'all have Jewish friends, right?
You all know the diaspora, and thousands of years of nomadicism by Jews was _forced_, right? 
You know that it was forced because of racism and anti-Semitism, and Jews have suffered greatly, culminating in the Holocaust, right?

It's nearly identical to Romany oppression. Their nomadicism has been forced. They have the same myths, same racist stereotypes of baby stealing and dark magic. They've been denied citizenship and forced to relocate century after century in Europe. They suffered over a million deaths in the Holocaust.

Why, then, would we romanticize their forced nomadicism? 

In dance,
Ron Blechner


On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 9:16 AM Isaac Banner via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Hey Jeff,

Not **us** non-roma folk, thank you. My family on my mother's side were a part of the culture and none of us appreciate the folks telling us not to worry and that we don't need to be offended.

Isaav

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 8:10 AM Jeffrey Spero via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
But Isaac… isn’t that what people on BOTH sides of the issue are doing? There are VERY few Roma in the contra community, and we’ve heard from very few overall on this issue.  Mostly it’s just us non-Roma folk arguing amongst ourselves about what WE perceive how a majority of the Roma people feel about this.  And that does apply to people who are both for and against using the term “gypsy” to describe a contradance move.  Aren’t we ALL saying what is right or wrong for people who are from another heritage?

And now I am bowing out of this controversy as it seems never-ending and very divisive.

Jeff



> On Oct 8, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Isaac Banner via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> Hey John,
>
> If the N word was also a move that somehow wasn't connected to the slur, you wouldn't dare argue that it's different or that you should get to call it, so drop the argument please. Just because you don't think I should be offended about the word and how it reflects on my heritage doesn't mean you get to dictate whether I actually am. I would ask you not to decide for others how they ought to experience and respect their racial identity, thanks.
>
> Isaac
>

_______________________________________________
List Name:  Callers mailing list
List Address:  Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/
_______________________________________________
List Name:  Callers mailing list
List Address:  Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/
_______________________________________________
List Name:  Callers mailing list
List Address:  Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/