Thanks Everyone – I seem to be trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist (or maybe it’s just me that has it).

 

I’ll post my “unknown” dances over time so as not to overwhelm the list.

 

Here’s the first:

1s Improper

Down hall 4-in-line (1's in the middle), Don't turn around, back-up a few steps, 1s arch while 2s go under to new couple (8)

Dosido the one you meet, Pass by and swing the next

Pass thru across set Right shoulder with Partner, turn alone; In normal couples R&L thru across

LLFB, 1s Swing in middle

 

Thanks

 

Jeremy

 

From: Callers [mailto:callers-bounces@lists.sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Laur via Callers
Sent: 25 November 2015 04:17
To: Winston, Alan P.; Paul Wilde via Callers
Cc: callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"]

 

I agree with Paul. I find this a great part of our forum and easily identifiable. 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad

On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, 10:56 PM, Paul Wilde via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:

I am happy w/ the present system whereby identifying requests/ answers are part of the regular forum.

 

Thanks,

Paul

 

First of all, I think making changes is a bit premature -- nobody AFAIK
is complaining about the current stream of requests.  That said, Mailman
has the ability to create "virtual" mailing lists called topics:

https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/node29.html

It would be straightforward -- once we agree on any topic names -- for
Seth/Chris to implement topic filtering.


Aahz speaks for me on this.  I don't find the current level any problem at all, and a sub-list tag
wouldn't be a problem either.

-- Alan

_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net