From: Jonathan Sivier via Contra Callers <contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 9:48 PM To: New Contra Callers List <contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> Subject: [External] [Callers] Re: Choreographic No-Nos
I don't agree with your list. Yes, swings on the first half of a phrase are challenging and I might try to avoid them. There are dances with this that generally work fine, especially if the caller is aware of the potential issue and
teaches and calls accordingly. The do-si-do across can be a bit awkward in a crowded line, but only if everyone is doing the do-si-do. If only the 1's or 2's are doing it then there is no problem. Shadow swings seem to be a personal preference or dislike
and not really a choreographic issue. I actually think that a right chain after a swing can work very well. If you end the swing with the pointy hands pointing across then the right hands of the right hand dancers are right there ready to pull by. I suppose
you might say there is a momentum change, but that can be very welcome in a dance where everything seems to be traveling the same way. Not every dance has to have continuous motion in the same direction all the time. I danced a dance with that set of figures
just last Friday and I was thinking to myself how well it seemed to work.
So I see #1 and #3 as more of a challenge than a problem. #4 is a personal preference and #2 seems like a perfectly fine transition between figures.
Jonathan
On 8/5/2024 7:37 PM, Michael Fuerst via Contra Callers wrote:
> I am accumulating a list of figures, or figure sequence that significant dance writers (not necessarily a majority) consider Choreographic No-Nos
> My list so far:
> 1. do-si-do across
> 2. right chain after a swing
> 3 short swings on an odd phrase
> 4. Shadow swings
> Does anyone have further suggestions?
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave@lists.sharedweight.net