HI, Luke!_______________________________________________I looked up Bill’s web site, and found that he wrote 20 Below in Feb, 2003. Coincidentally enough, I came up with The Winter Storm that very same month and year…..I was on the ferry to Martha’s Vineyard to call a dance over there, and there was a cold, windy, snowy storm….but not enough to keep the ferries in port! I thought of the dance while on the ferry. The storm was the biggest part of the story; but I also know that at that time, some of us were attempting to come up with dances that had a different start than “circle left 3/4, swing N”. I learned about Bill’s dance a few years later. Since the A’s are a bit different from each other, I believe they do qualify as different dances…..but not by much! So it will be interesting to see what folks have to say about Ron’s most recent question…..As for zig zags, I find it very useful that the timing is “squishy” , or “forgiving” in some compositions, since this means that many dance styles and abilities are accommodated. In Meg’s Choice, by Sue Rosen, called in Rehoboth by the author, Amy Larkin and Bob Golder were dancing together, and they turned the zig/zag motion into a playful poussette. Very nice!Your final entry below is very similar to Boys from Urbana by John Coffman.Becket-CWA1 -----------(8) Circle Left 3/4 (with P)Zig left Zag rightNew gents alle left 1/2A2 -----------(16) Neighbor balance and swingB1 -----------(8) Long lines, forward and back(8) Women allemande Right 1-1/2B2 -----------(16) Partner balance and swingI believe in your second, single progression dance, the dancers may arrive early for the N B&S—a bit too “squishy” for some?The dances may very well be new compositions, so I look forward to hearing from others on the list.warmly, LindaOn Jul 30, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Luke Donforth via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:_______________________________________________Hello folks,Thanks for all the insight on Grand Marches. It was a very fruitful discussion for me, so I'm going to toss another question out there.What timing do you like for zig and zag the set? The (uncommon) move where you and someone else (usually partner) move out to one side and slip behind the couple you were facing to face a new couple, and then possibly do it again where you keep going and then cut back to face a 3rd couple (double progression).
I've got dances in my box that have a zig and zag in 8 (single progression) like Bill Pope's "The Cows Are Watching"; and I've got danced in my box that zig-zag-zig (double progression) in 8, like Rick Mohr's "Leave the Wine".
A couple of the zig-zag dances I've seen do the zig and zag in, pairing it with a circle 1 1/4 or such (Will Mentor's "Frock's Rocking Frolic").I've danced and enjoyed all of these dances, or they wouldn't be in my box, but it seems a squishier move on timing than most; so I'm curious what people think about it; and/or what they ask for the band when calling one of these.
This came up for me when I was playing with a new (I think) choreography. I put forth two possibilities drawing inspiration from Linda Leslie's Winter Storm and Bill Olson's 20 Below (side question, which one came first?).
Becket, double progression cwA1Circle Left 3/4With Partner, zig left, zag right past a couple, zig left to face another new coupleA2New Neighbor Gypsy and SwingB1Men allemande Left 1 1/2Pass Partner Right to start 1/2 heyB2Partner Gypsy and SwingBecket, single progression cw
A1Circle Left 3/4With Partner, zig left, zag right to face new coupleA2New Neighbor balance and swingB1Men allemande Left 1 1/2
Pass Partner to start 1/2 hey by RightB2Partner Balance and SwingAnd for those of you who have stuck with my rambling this long, I'll toss another one out there:
Becket, single progression, ccwA1Circle Left 1 1/4with Partner: Zig left, zag right to face new coupleA2New Neighbor balance and swing
B1Promenade across set with NeighborWomen Do-Si-Do 1 1/2B2Partner Balance and SwingIf I had enough dancers, I'd just medley them; using the double progression every other time so you'd always see new faces... no, wait, that's a terrible idea.
Thoughts or experience?
Thanks again!--
Callers mailing list
Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
Callers mailing list
Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net