[Organizers] Volunteers

[David Chandler via Organizers]

A very useful broad perspective, Mark, since all of us are all-volunteer
organizations (I assume). I wonder if you have any specific things you do
to "cultivate" your volunteers and encourage them to keep coming and take
increasing amounts of responsibility?

Thanks.
David Chandler

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Mark Jones <markjones at busybusy.org> wrote:

> I believe a profoundly useful point of view for any
> organizer-producer, is that each and every volunteer, over time, may
> have the potential to succeed you (or, as the case may be, relieve
> you).
>
> And...that some (few) volunteers may be sufficiently equipped or
> motivated to grow into, besides running the dance, to participate on
> your organization's board, or perhaps, be so vigorous in interest as
> to help establish a new dance series.
>
> This is the long-run future of having a variety of well-cultivated
> volunteers and friends-in-aid: recent, long-time, younger and older.
> It is not a slight task to welcome them, treat them well, and invite
> them to appreciate the responsibility of aiding their own community
> work well.
>
> Treating your volunteers well is a broader topic than free admission to
> the dance (and free admission may not be meaningful to some people.)
>
> With the organizer, and with future organizers as represented by
> present and future volunteers, there is a future dance and a future
> dance community, and the leadership to sustain it.
>
> Every musician knows that it is the organizer-producers that are
> crucial for their gig opportunities, and for creating dances.
>
> I relatedly view it as an essential part of growing the community of
> dance to be alert to (the hard work and dedication that make)
> opportunities for making it possible for young musicians to earn their
> musical chops by playing regularly (another kind of volunteer).
>
> Then there is the project of thoughtfully exposing and welcoming a
> variety of new people who have never danced, whether younger or older
> to your community.  One might call them volunteers.
>
> Regards,
> Mark Jones
> Boston Massachusetts
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:46 PM, David Chandler via Organizers
> <organizers at lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> > I'm interested in how other groups handle in-dance organizational tasks -
> > collecting admissions, putting out refreshments, sound and perhaps
> checking
> > shoes at the door. Do you use volunteers? Pay people? If volunteers, do
> you
> > have a structured corps of volunteers you rely on or just ask for
> volunteers
> > as needed? It would be very helpful if you mentioned how frequently you
> have
> > dances, and roughly how many attend your dances.
> >
> > We (Country Dance New York) have a pretty formal system, and put on
> roughly
> > 80 dances a year (weekly Tuesday and Saturday 9.5 months a year), getting
> > roughly 40-50 for English and 60 plus for contra. Some people volunteer
> for
> > only one or a few dances, but a lot of the work is done by "full-time
> > volunteers," who do at least 8 tasks during the fall and/or spring. In
> > exchange for this they get in free to every event. The tasks are also
> pretty
> > structured - only members can work the door in order to increase
> security of
> > funds, and attendance is kept on an iPad using Square so there is some
> > training involved; refreshments involve buying food, refilling water
> > pitchers and putting out a number of different things to eat at the
> break,
> > then washing dishes and cleaning up. Volunteer coordinators line up
> people
> > for each task in advance. In general this works very well - tasks get
> done,
> > and volunteers who are short on cash can get in free. The downside, in my
> > view, relates to our feeling dependent on the system and thus reluctant
> to
> > consider other options for fear we would lose our volunteers. In
> particular,
> > some have suggested that it would be more fair to lower our admission
> rate
> > for those most likely to be in need (students in particular), or to go
> to a
> > "pay what you can" system of some sort. The reports I've read suggest
> that
> > "pay what you can" usually works out well, with perhaps increased
> attendance
> > and no loss of income. However, we can't do that because if people could
> get
> > in by paying what they can the incentive to be a volunteer would vanish
> and
> > we are afraid we would not be able to get things done (or a very small
> group
> > would have to do them, and burn out since we have so many dances).
> However,
> > I have heard rumors that other dances don't have such a structured
> volunteer
> > system and still manage to get these in-dance tasks done. I would love to
> > hear how you manage getting tasks done with volunteers, especially if you
> > have a "pay what you can" or very reduced rate for those in need.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > David
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Organizers mailing list
> > Organizers at lists.sharedweight.net
> > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/organizers-sharedweight.net
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/organizers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20170213/3dbffa22/attachment.htm>