<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Could someone please explain to me why the word gyp*** is considered
a racial slur. I note that the body that represents gyp***s in the
USA calls itself the Gypsy Council USA and in the UK it is the Gypsy
Council. This is the term they have chosen to represent their
ethnicity and they seem to be proud of it. Who are we to disagree?<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<center> <br>
<div align="left"><font size="+1" face="Ubuntu">Michael
Barraclough</font><br>
<font size="+1" face="Ubuntu"> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://michaelbarraclough.com">http://michaelbarraclough.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</font></div>
</center>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/14/2018 01:33 PM, Rich Sbardella
via Callers wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAE4BujK17L0fL_S7ox5F-P44wV--gfV1cA2NEk+s4uYZDbx2aQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">I think having a word that sounds similar is an
asset, not a liability. I have used look-see quite
successfully. In years, few will know that a "look-see" used to
be called as a G... I have also used Walk 'round with no
problem.
<div><br>
<div>My initial attempt was Hipsy, but Linda Leslie quickly,
and prudently discouraged such usage.</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Rich</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Martha
Wild via Callers <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">callers@lists.sharedweight.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I don’t
see that if you substitute a term that ends with a long e it
should be nixed just for that reason. OK, maybe kipsy might
be considered just a euphemism. But "Look-see", as described
by Susan Michaels, has the virtue of involving the fact that
you are looking at the other person, and seeing them. Why
shouldn’t we choose a term that’s easier to substitute and
remember to use like “Look-see” instead of the bland, cold,
bulky, impossible to shorten, “right shoulder round” (or
left shoulder round).<br>
Martha<br>
<br>
> On Mar 14, 2018, at 1:11 PM, Kalia Kliban via Callers
<<a href="mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">callers@lists.sharedweight.<wbr>net</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> I appreciate the point that several have made that a
term that sounds just like gypsy isn't a reasonable
substitute. Fair enough. The search continues...<br>
><br>
> Kalia in Sebastopol<br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> List Name: Callers mailing list<br>
> List Address: <a
href="mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">Callers@lists.sharedweight.net</a><br>
> Archives: <a
href="https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.mail-archive.com/<wbr>callers@lists.sharedweight.<wbr>net/</a><br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
List Name: Callers mailing list<br>
List Address: <a
href="mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">Callers@lists.sharedweight.net</a><br>
Archives: <a
href="https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.mail-archive.com/<wbr>callers@lists.sharedweight.<wbr>net/</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
List Name: Callers mailing list
List Address: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net">Callers@lists.sharedweight.net</a>
Archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/">https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>