<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">In southern-style square dancing, there are several variations on a figure which is often called “dosido” for two couples, and they are nothing like what Luke is imagining. They go by names like Georgia Rangtang, Georgy-Alabam, Do-si, Dosido and (I think) in MWSD a version of it is called Do Paso. That’s not to say that the figure you are describing isn’t a good one for your dance; it’s just another reason to avoid calling it a dosido. <div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Richard<br class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; border-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````<br class="">Richard Hopkins<br class="">Tallahassee FL<br class="">850-544-7614<br class=""><a href="mailto:hopkinsrs@comcast.net" class="">hopkinsrs@comcast.net</a><br class=""><br class=""></span>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 1, 2015, at 4:01 PM, via Callers <<a href="mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net" class="">callers@lists.sharedweight.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">Send Callers mailing list submissions to<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><a href="mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net" class="">callers@lists.sharedweight.net</a><br class=""><br class="">To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net<br class="">or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>callers-request@lists.sharedweight.net<br class=""><br class="">You can reach the person managing the list at<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>callers-owner@lists.sharedweight.net<br class=""><br class="">When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br class="">than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Today's Topics:<br class=""><br class=""> 1. Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance (Aahz via Callers)<br class=""> 2. Re: Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance (Aahz via Callers)<br class=""> 3. 4 person do-si-do? (Luke Donforth via Callers)<br class=""> 4. Re: 4 person do-si-do? (Tom Hinds via Callers)<br class=""> 5. Re: Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance<br class=""> (Aahz Maruch via Callers)<br class=""> 6. Re: 4 person do-si-do? (Aahz Maruch via Callers)<br class=""> 7. Re: Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance<br class=""> (Bill Olson via Callers)<br class=""> 8. Re: 4 person do-si-do? (Hilton Baxter via Callers)<br class=""> 9. Re: 4 person do-si-do? (Rich Sbardella via Callers)<br class=""> 10. Re: 4 person do-si-do? (Don Veino via Callers)<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">----------------------------------------------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 1<br class="">Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:27:22 -0800<br class="">From: Aahz via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">Subject: [Callers] Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance<br class="">Message-ID: <20151130222722.GA23748@panix.com><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br class=""><br class="">Howdy,<br class=""><br class="">I've been asked to run a barn dance Saturday Jan 16, 9pm-11pm, but I'm<br class="">busy. The dance will be part of the Western Regional Outdoor Leadership<br class="">Conference:<br class=""><br class="">http://outdoored.stanford.edu/center/wrolc-2016/<br class=""><br class="">If you don't know where Stanford is, you're probably coming from too far<br class="">away to make sense. ;-)<br class=""><br class="">There will be 100+ college students. The theme for this year's<br class="">conference is "diversity", and they would prefer a caller who can fit the<br class="">theme in addition to having experience with one-night-stand environments.<br class=""><br class="">I've offered to be a filter so that they don't need to deal with the<br class="">responses, so please respond privately to me if you're interested and<br class="">available. I've already explained that booking will be somewhat<br class="">difficult both because of the relatively short notice and because it's<br class="">Ralph Page weekend.<br class=""><br class="">I probably will also be sending out an e-mail blast to people I have<br class="">addresses for, apologies if you get this twice. They have already<br class="">contacted other callers so you may actually get three copies...<br class="">-- <br class="">Square/Contra Caller http://caller.aahz.ws/<br class=""> <*> <*> <*><br class="">"Those who hear not the music think the dancers mad."<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 2<br class="">Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:10:45 -0800<br class="">From: Aahz via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance<br class="">Message-ID: <20151201001045.GA4132@panix.com><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br class=""><br class="">On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, Aahz via Callers wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">I've been asked to run a barn dance Saturday Jan 16, 9pm-11pm, but I'm<br class="">busy. The dance will be part of the Western Regional Outdoor Leadership<br class="">Conference:<br class=""><br class="">http://outdoored.stanford.edu/center/wrolc-2016/<br class=""><br class="">If you don't know where Stanford is, you're probably coming from too far<br class="">away to make sense. ;-)<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Someone pointed out that I should at least have mentioned that this is<br class="">California.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 3<br class="">Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 05:45:27 -0500<br class="">From: Luke Donforth via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: "Callers@Lists.Sharedweight.net" <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">Subject: [Callers] 4 person do-si-do?<br class="">Message-ID:<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><CAFrKOZbyzOSGTT2YwMjcghwcmXnQi+ek0J-=ekz0QKJgGLi7Ng@mail.gmail.com><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br class=""><br class="">It's 5 am, and I find myself awake and writing dances; specifically 4x4s.<br class="">Unfortunately, I don't have 8 dancers waiting on my insomnia to test<br class="">things, so I figured I'd send them to shared weight...<br class=""><br class="">Possibly this is a choreographic question already answered in square<br class="">dancing, but I'm not familiar with the outcome. How well does a four person<br class="">do-si-do work? I'm thinking of something along the lines of:<br class=""><br class="">Doubled-si-do<br class="">Four Facing Four<br class=""><br class="">A1 -----------<br class="">(4) Give and Gents take (up and down)<br class="">(12) Neighbor swing<br class="">A2 -----------<br class="">(8) Women's Chain back to partner (up and down), turn to face in<br class="">(8) All four Women Do-si-do 1x<br class="">B1 -----------<br class="">(8) All four Men Do-si-do 1x<br class="">(8) All eight Circle Left 1/2x<br class="">B2 -----------<br class="">(16) Partner balance and swing<br class="">End facing line of direction<br class=""><br class="">In my head, the four person do-si-do is a right hand star sans hands; but<br class="">not sure how well it'll fly; especially since the right diagonal women have<br class="">less far to turn to face in than the left diagonal women coming out of the<br class="">chain.<br class=""><br class="">Thoughts?<br class=""><br class="">Thank you<br class=""><br class="">-- <br class="">Luke Donforth<br class="">Luke.Donforth@gmail.com <Luke.Donev@gmail.com><br class="">-------------- next part --------------<br class="">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br class="">URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20151201/18d8ab09/attachment.html><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 4<br class="">Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 08:55:12 -0500<br class="">From: Tom Hinds via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: Luke Donforth <luke.donev@gmail.com><br class="">Cc: "Callers@Lists.Sharedweight.net" <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] 4 person do-si-do?<br class="">Message-ID: <3EA4A682-26DF-4FB9-8BA8-CC22215C526D@earthlink.net><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed<br class=""><br class="">Luke,<br class=""><br class="">There have been times when I've tried new ideas and the dancers <br class="">figured out an easier way. Or said differently they saw through the <br class="">complexity and thought it was not worth the effort. I'm not saying <br class="">this is true for your dance but it's something to be prepared for.<br class=""><br class="">In terms of timing I'd guess that the 4 person do-si-do is going to <br class="">take more than 8 beats.<br class=""><br class="">Tom<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 5<br class="">Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 07:10:56 -0800<br class="">From: Aahz Maruch via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance<br class="">Message-ID: <20151201151056.GA19052@panix.com><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br class=""><br class="">On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, Aahz via Callers wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">I've offered to be a filter so that they don't need to deal with the<br class="">responses, so please respond privately to me if you're interested and<br class="">available. I've already explained that booking will be somewhat<br class="">difficult both because of the relatively short notice and because it's<br class="">Ralph Page weekend.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Thanks to the several people who told me about Contra Carnivale, that's<br class="">proof I'm currently out of the loop on the contra side. ;-)<br class="">-- <br class="">Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/<br class=""> <*> <*> <*><br class="">Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 6<br class="">Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 07:22:40 -0800<br class="">From: Aahz Maruch via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] 4 person do-si-do?<br class="">Message-ID: <20151201152240.GA7848@panix.com><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br class=""><br class="">On Tue, Dec 01, 2015, Luke Donforth via Callers wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">Possibly this is a choreographic question already answered in square<br class="">dancing, but I'm not familiar with the outcome. How well does a four person<br class="">do-si-do work? I'm thinking of something along the lines of:<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">In the normal duple improper formation, a four-person do-si-do is called<br class="">zigzag, there are lots of dances with that. But that's not what you're<br class="">doing here.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">In my head, the four person do-si-do is a right hand star sans hands; but<br class="">not sure how well it'll fly; especially since the right diagonal women have<br class="">less far to turn to face in than the left diagonal women coming out of the<br class="">chain.<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">From my POV, that's a four-person gypsy. Or maybe the square dance<br class=""></blockquote>equivalent would be promenade inside the ring. The key element of<br class="">do-si-do is facing the same direction during the movement (modulo the<br class="">contra variant of a spinning do-si-do or square dancing's highland fling)<br class="">and ending up facing the same direction at the end.<br class=""><br class="">I recently saw a square dance caller struggle with explaining Walk Around<br class="">the Corner (which is square dancing's equivalent of gypsy) and See Saw,<br class="">failing to mention either of the "easy" ways of getting across the<br class="">concept:<br class=""><br class="">* keep your shoulder toward the person you're walking around<br class=""><br class="">* exactly the same thing as an armless allemande<br class=""><br class="">Anyway, there are probably several ways to call what you want, but I<br class="">think that do-si-do ain't one of them. ;-)<br class="">-- <br class="">Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/<br class=""> <*> <*> <*><br class="">Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 7<br class="">Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:04:53 +0000<br class="">From: Bill Olson via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: Aahz <caller@aahz.ws>, "callers@lists.sharedweight.net"<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance<br class="">Message-ID: <BAY177-W24CB4327B5398ED4B4147AC60F0@phx.gbl><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br class=""><br class="">I think most people figured that one out! Go Cardinals!! Win PAC 12 title!<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:10:45 -0800<br class="">To: callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] Caller needed: 1/16 Stanford barn dance<br class="">From: callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class=""><br class="">On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, Aahz via Callers wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">I've been asked to run a barn dance Saturday Jan 16, 9pm-11pm, but I'm<br class="">busy. The dance will be part of the Western Regional Outdoor Leadership<br class="">Conference:<br class=""><br class="">http://outdoored.stanford.edu/center/wrolc-2016/<br class=""><br class="">If you don't know where Stanford is, you're probably coming from too far<br class="">away to make sense. ;-)<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Someone pointed out that I should at least have mentioned that this is<br class="">California.<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Callers mailing list<br class="">Callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net<br class=""></blockquote> <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span> <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span> <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span> <br class="">-------------- next part --------------<br class="">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br class="">URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20151201/caa3e4db/attachment-0001.htm><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 8<br class="">Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:10:16 -0500<br class="">From: Hilton Baxter via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] 4 person do-si-do?<br class="">Message-ID: <565DD478.8060908@binghamton.edu><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed<br class=""><br class="">I wrote a dance with a 4 person do-si-do and have called it a few times. <br class="">Whoever has to travel from the far corners will need an extra couple of <br class="">beats, so it's good to have a "soft" figure after the do-si-do for 4, so <br class="">the folks arrive late (men, in your dance, Luke) can catch up somewhat <br class="">gracefully.<br class=""><br class="">As for treating it as a gypsy for 4, in my dance people liked going <br class="">forward and then twirling away to the right and back to place. This was <br class="">probably because it gave some ccw movement to contrast cw turns <br class="">elsewhere in the dance. To teach the figure, I've had dancers do a RH <br class="">star "but just pretend to touch" then walk through with twirls over L <br class="">shoulder.<br class=""><br class="">Hilton Baxter<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">On 12/1/15 10:22 AM, Aahz Maruch via Callers wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Tue, Dec 01, 2015, Luke Donforth via Callers wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Possibly this is a choreographic question already answered in square<br class="">dancing, but I'm not familiar with the outcome. How well does a four person<br class="">do-si-do work? I'm thinking of something along the lines of:<br class=""></blockquote>In the normal duple improper formation, a four-person do-si-do is called<br class="">zigzag, there are lots of dances with that. But that's not what you're<br class="">doing here.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">In my head, the four person do-si-do is a right hand star sans hands; but<br class="">not sure how well it'll fly; especially since the right diagonal women have<br class="">less far to turn to face in than the left diagonal women coming out of the<br class="">chain.<br class=""></blockquote> From my POV, that's a four-person gypsy. Or maybe the square dance<br class="">equivalent would be promenade inside the ring. The key element of<br class="">do-si-do is facing the same direction during the movement (modulo the<br class="">contra variant of a spinning do-si-do or square dancing's highland fling)<br class="">and ending up facing the same direction at the end.<br class=""><br class="">I recently saw a square dance caller struggle with explaining Walk Around<br class="">the Corner (which is square dancing's equivalent of gypsy) and See Saw,<br class="">failing to mention either of the "easy" ways of getting across the<br class="">concept:<br class=""><br class="">* keep your shoulder toward the person you're walking around<br class=""><br class="">* exactly the same thing as an armless allemande<br class=""><br class="">Anyway, there are probably several ways to call what you want, but I<br class="">think that do-si-do ain't one of them. ;-)<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 9<br class="">Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:08:28 -0500<br class="">From: Rich Sbardella via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: Luke Donforth <luke.donev@gmail.com><br class="">Cc: "Callers@Lists.Sharedweight.net" <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] 4 person do-si-do?<br class="">Message-ID:<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><CAE4BujLVWfDArVtrTdUY-mffVCX83EFLui3zZzqG24YQF=41Zw@mail.gmail.com><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br class=""><br class="">Luke,<br class=""><br class="">In modern square dance a left hand star without hands is simply called<br class="">promenade inside. By definition a right hand star w/o hands would be a<br class="">reverse promenade inside. Both would take 8 beats/steps to accomplish in a<br class="">square, and probably close to eight beats in a mescolanza.<br class=""><br class="">I do not quite understand your comment about the women, as they will all<br class="">have to adjust there walk around to accomodate for the last women into the<br class="">"handless star" or promenade.<br class=""><br class="">Unless I am misunderstanding your concept, this does not resemble a dosido<br class="">in any fashion, and I believe using that term might muddy the use of Dosido<br class="">and As Couples Dosido.<br class=""><br class="">Rich Sbardella<br class="">Stafford, CT<br class=""><br class="">On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Luke Donforth via Callers <<br class="">callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">It's 5 am, and I find myself awake and writing dances; specifically 4x4s.<br class="">Unfortunately, I don't have 8 dancers waiting on my insomnia to test<br class="">things, so I figured I'd send them to shared weight...<br class=""><br class="">Possibly this is a choreographic question already answered in square<br class="">dancing, but I'm not familiar with the outcome. How well does a four person<br class="">do-si-do work? I'm thinking of something along the lines of:<br class=""><br class="">Doubled-si-do<br class="">Four Facing Four<br class=""><br class="">A1 -----------<br class="">(4) Give and Gents take (up and down)<br class="">(12) Neighbor swing<br class="">A2 -----------<br class="">(8) Women's Chain back to partner (up and down), turn to face in<br class="">(8) All four Women Do-si-do 1x<br class="">B1 -----------<br class="">(8) All four Men Do-si-do 1x<br class="">(8) All eight Circle Left 1/2x<br class="">B2 -----------<br class="">(16) Partner balance and swing<br class="">End facing line of direction<br class=""><br class="">In my head, the four person do-si-do is a right hand star sans hands; but<br class="">not sure how well it'll fly; especially since the right diagonal women have<br class="">less far to turn to face in than the left diagonal women coming out of the<br class="">chain.<br class=""><br class="">Thoughts?<br class=""><br class="">Thank you<br class=""><br class="">--<br class="">Luke Donforth<br class="">Luke.Donforth@gmail.com <Luke.Donev@gmail.com><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Callers mailing list<br class="">Callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></blockquote>-------------- next part --------------<br class="">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br class="">URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20151201/19ea7ed8/attachment-0001.htm><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Message: 10<br class="">Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:21:00 -0500<br class="">From: Don Veino via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">To: Luke Donforth <luke.donev@gmail.com><br class="">Cc: "Callers@Lists.Sharedweight.net" <callers@lists.sharedweight.net><br class="">Subject: Re: [Callers] 4 person do-si-do?<br class="">Message-ID:<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><CAAJTtiJeho-rMBkH-c9g6rdhS0ppc5+XZQE=RYRCVKzXSJzEjQ@mail.gmail.com><br class="">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br class=""><br class="">With respect to Tom's prior comment about dancers substituting the simplest<br class="">interpretation sometimes, I think this dance could have that apply.<br class=""><br class="">Up through the A2 Ladies Chain you are in lines of four facing<br class="">configuration (as opposed to square). If the Dosidos happen in two groups<br class="">of 2 (parallel traditional Dosidos) up and down then that formation is<br class="">maintained, timing is proven and the Circle entry still has the same<br class="">inertia.<br class=""><br class="">-Don<br class=""><br class="">On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Luke Donforth via Callers <<br class="">callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">It's 5 am, and I find myself awake and writing dances; specifically 4x4s.<br class="">Unfortunately, I don't have 8 dancers waiting on my insomnia to test<br class="">things, so I figured I'd send them to shared weight...<br class=""><br class="">Possibly this is a choreographic question already answered in square<br class="">dancing, but I'm not familiar with the outcome. How well does a four person<br class="">do-si-do work? I'm thinking of something along the lines of:<br class=""><br class="">Doubled-si-do<br class="">Four Facing Four<br class=""><br class="">A1 -----------<br class="">(4) Give and Gents take (up and down)<br class="">(12) Neighbor swing<br class="">A2 -----------<br class="">(8) Women's Chain back to partner (up and down), turn to face in<br class="">(8) All four Women Do-si-do 1x<br class="">B1 -----------<br class="">(8) All four Men Do-si-do 1x<br class="">(8) All eight Circle Left 1/2x<br class="">B2 -----------<br class="">(16) Partner balance and swing<br class="">End facing line of direction<br class=""><br class="">In my head, the four person do-si-do is a right hand star sans hands; but<br class="">not sure how well it'll fly; especially since the right diagonal women have<br class="">less far to turn to face in than the left diagonal women coming out of the<br class="">chain.<br class=""><br class="">Thoughts?<br class=""><br class="">Thank you<br class=""><br class="">--<br class="">Luke Donforth<br class="">Luke.Donforth@gmail.com <Luke.Donev@gmail.com><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Callers mailing list<br class="">Callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></blockquote>-------------- next part --------------<br class="">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br class="">URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20151201/71279bcc/attachment-0001.htm><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">Subject: Digest Footer<br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Callers mailing list<br class="">Callers@lists.sharedweight.net<br class="">http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">------------------------------<br class=""><br class="">End of Callers Digest, Vol 20, Issue 1<br class="">**************************************<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>