[Callers] How would you teach this? What would you call it?

[Julia Whiteneck]

whoops - further consideration, i admit I don't know an easy way! seems straightforward though, if you just explain the simple mechanism of going out and then coming back in it doesn't seem complicated. I would make sure to say how far around the star should go, who is in the lead going out and then who is in the lead going back in.

________________________________
From: Callers <callers-bounces at lists.sharedweight.net> on behalf of Julia Whiteneck via Callers <callers at lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 5:43 PM
To: Callers at Lists.Sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] How would you teach this? What would you call it?

looks like a star into a slide left

________________________________
From: Callers <callers-bounces at lists.sharedweight.net> on behalf of Luke Donforth via Callers <callers at lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 4:30 PM
To: Callers at Lists.Sharedweight.net
Subject: [Callers] How would you teach this? What would you call it?

Hi All,

I'm playing around with choreographing triplets, and I've got a sequence that I think would flow well; but I'm not sure how to teach it short of a demo.

The idea is that couples 2 & 3 do a star. Out of that star, they move out, up, and back in; leaving space in the middle for couple 1 to move to the bottom.

I put together an animation of it:
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/292197780/

Is that already a defined move? What would you call it? How would you teach it?

Thanks for your thoughts!

--
Luke Donforth
Luke.Donforth at gmail.com<mailto:Luke.Donev at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20190307/47d5a1f1/attachment.html>