[Callers] Jets / rubies genderfree terms redux: gems?

Linda Leslie via Callers callers at lists.sharedweight.net
Fri May 29 09:03:55 PDT 2015


Thanks for reviewing these thoughts, Ron. I am in full agreement with all of your points!
Linda Leslie

On May 29, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Ron Blechner via Callers <callers at lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> For reference, my own thoughts on the terms, and a general FAQ about gender free terms:
> http://contradances.tumblr.com/post/113203981035/genderfree-contra-dance-term-faq
> 
> I have not updated it with gems / rubies.
> 
> I like jets / rubies, but I think gems / rubies is better:
> 
> 1. I disagree that the "em" sound is harder to hear than the "et" in jet. Good mic skills / having a foam pad on a mic will dull the sharp "ts" in "gents", and thus, "jets". Because a loud "ts" on the mic is harsh. Therefore, this argument against "gems" is not an issue.
> 
> 2. A lot of people don't know "jet" is a gemstone, and so they think airplane. I've had a lot of gender free dancers complain about this.  Given that the terms need to serve the LGBTQ community, and not merely us as callers, I take this complaint seriously. Thus, "gem" is a better choice.
> 
> 3. Yes, a ruby is a gem. So what? They're both gems.
> 
> 4. There's a gender connotation to thinking jet = airplane, since it's either phallic, or people think the NY/NJ football team, or the West Side Story fictional gang. Again, the terms are here to serve the dancers, not merely us.
> 
> 5. Gem has all the same advantages as jet.
> 
> I thus think gem / ruby is a superior pair than jet / ruby.
> 
> Ron Blechner
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20150529/1659854a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Callers mailing list