[Callers] Dances with One Swing

Fri Jun 26 06:10:47 PDT 2015

I am happy to see that I am not alone in my perspective.  I oftn dance 18th
Century contras with little or no swinging and they are indeed enjoyable.

That being said, I have very few mondern contras with one, or no swings
included.  Can anyone suggest some good ones to add to my collection?

Rich Sbardella
Stafford, CT

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Perry Shafran via Callers <
callers at lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:

> Completely agree with this perspective.  Contra is, at its heart, more of
> a community dance than a partner dance, because you dance with so many
> different people during the course of one dance.  I think that, over the
> years, contra has become more of a partner-centered dance, and I often see
> dancers outright ignore their neighbors to give full attention to their
> partners at all times.
>
> I also must be from the old school, because short periods of inactivity
> during a dance has never bothered me, and like Rich I do tend to appreciate
> that.  I think that the desire for contra to be fast-paced and
> always-moving, while exciting for many contra dancers, has turned off many
> other long-time contra dancers.
>
> But the trend does seem to be for fast-moving high-energy dancing, and I
> do think that callers need to be somewhat concerned with that.  However, I
> also think that callers also need to be concerned with the folks who don't
> move so fast and like the periods of inactivity, where they can get
> themselves set if need be and be where they want to be for the next move.
> Trying to integrate all types of dancers is what makes this a true form of
> community dance.
>
> Perry
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* Rich Sbardella <richsbardella at gmail.com>
> *To:* Perry Shafran <pshaf at yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* Shared_Weight_Callers <callers at lists.sharedweight.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:41 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Callers] More on Programming
>
> I differ with Cary's generalized storyline of contra being "uniting of
> partners".  If I had to generalize a storyline, it would be of building
> community.  I may be wrong, but I think David Kaynor, in his calling
> booklet, referred to your "hands four" group as your "neighborhood".  I
> love that terminology.  I often choose new or weak dancers as partners, and
> I rely on the support of these neighborhoods to make the dance enjoyable.
>
> In a square the neighborhood changes from four dancers to eight but you
> stay with them longer.  In most mixer squares, if called and danced
> correctly, the partner relationship is restored as the dance resolves.
>
> As a dancer, I love squares.  It is a refreshing change, thus adding
> variety without difficulty, during an evening of contras.  Squares often
> provide a rest period as others dance.  This is a plus, not a minus; as I
> age, I appreciate the rest.
>
> I have found that some callers who are quite competent with contras, are
> terrible with squares,  I also see callers choosing squares that are too
> difficult for an open contra dance, thus causing failure on the floor.
> Calling squares is a different art than calling contras.  Choosing squares
> carefully with an adequate walk thru is essential.  If a caller gets too
> much negative feedback, or no positive feedback, perhaps that caller should
> not be calling squares.
>
> Another problem is that squares are not called often enough at some
> series.  The concept of corners, opposites, home position, RH lady, etc,,
> are foreign to many contra dancers.  These are all EZ concepts but all
> together in a four minute blitz, every once in a while, can be overwhelming.
>
> Adding squares regularly to our programs would enhance and expand the
> experience.
>
> Squarely, (can I say that?)
> Rich Sbardella
> Stafford, CT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Perry Shafran via Callers <
> callers at lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> See, this is what I mean, when I get advice from some callers that say one
> thing and advice from other callers that say the complete opposite.
>
> I figure that there are lots of different people on the floor.  Some
> people LIKE squares, believe it or not.  Whenever I see squares called,
> yeah, there are some people who head for the sidelines, but generally I see
> dancers on the floor having a good time.  So I learned some time ago that
> for everyone who grumbles about a square being called, there are 10 others
> who love it.
>
> As for insisting that every dance has two swings AND the neighbor swing
> MUST come before the partner swing, that seems to be a personal preference
> rather than a hard and fast rule.  I think that most dancers don't really
> care which one comes first.  I went to a dance weekend this past weekend
> where there were more than a few dances with no neighbor swing, and it
> appeared that everyone had a great time dancing.
>
> I have long been taught that variety is the spice of life, and people do
> enjoy squares mixed in with a contra, as well as varied choreography.
> Varied choreography makes the dance interesting.  Hard and fast rules limit
> the choreography that you can do and excludes many all-time great dances
> that might have a neighbor swing or a partner swing first (like Joyride and
> Ramsay Chase).  And let's not even talking about throwing in an occasional
> chestnut in there - we have to get rid of all those wonderful dances
> because they are "boring" by today's standards.  (Except to those folks who
> love them of course!)
>
> Perry
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* Cary Ravitz via Callers <callers at lists.sharedweight.net>
> *To:* Shared_Weight_Callers <callers at lists.sharedweight.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:34 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Callers] More on Programming
>
> Why swings in every dance - because that is a huge part of the contra
> experience, a swing with the person that you asked to dance.
>
> Why should the partner swing follow the neighbor swing - because this is
> an art form, not an exercise routine. The storyline of a contra is the
> uniting of partners, not the the breaking up of partners (that's my
> preference anyway). And in practical terms, I want to be with my partner at
> the end of a dance to thank them quickly before finding another partner.
>
> "Squares are just like contras, only you have to listen" - this is not
> correct.
>
> Some things that people to not like about squares -
>
>   less movement/music connection due to lack of strict phrasing
>   having to listen to the caller breaks the movement/music connection
>   teaching time
>   mixer squares breaks the partner connection
>   visiting squares leave people "out of the dance" for long periods.
>
> I find squares and contras completely different.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:47 AM, George Mercer via Callers <
> callers at lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> I may not be a good example or even that good a caller, but ... I like
> swings, I have no need to have a neighbor swing in every dance and most
> certainly don't care where in the dance the neighbor swing happens.  That's
> making up rules for the sake of having rules.  I like the buzz step, but to
> put it mildly there are many dancers with whom a buzz step is impossible,
> difficult or merely uncomfortable.  I teach a walking swing and sometimes
> demonstrate a buzz step with a little time for practice. Far too many
> callers and beginner workshop instructors teach a buzz step in a way that
> promotes bouncing, which in turn makes swinging difficult or worse. I've
> also heard more than one caller-instructor tell dancers that to "give
> weight" (an inadequate term) they should lean back. Just kill me. As a
> dancer, I often combine a walking swing-with a buzz step -- especially if
> we have gotten out of sync with the music. I come down on to the floor when
> I think it's required. On two occasions recently while dancing, the person
> I was dancing with said, "Well, this a dance the caller has never actually
> danced before. If she or he had, she or he wouldn't have chosen it." Amen.
> I was at an dance recently where a mixer was called near the end of the
> evening. I'm not sure what that was all about. Once early in my limited
> calling career,just as the first dance got underway about 20 newcomers
> walked in. I then called several dances without swings, just to get them
> acclimated to moving in rhythm and with the music.  I'll never do that
> again.  I was too cautious and shouldn't have been. I honestly was afraid
> the experienced dancers were going to hurt me. And they say I can't learn.
> Perhaps my biggest peeve on the dance floor is the experienced dancers who
> insist on sharing their bad dance habits (swinging backwards, excessive and
> unexpected twirling -- I almost wrote twerking --, inappropriate dipping,
> showing how athletic and fancy they are, etc.) with new dancers rather than
> helping them learn the basic fundamentals, timing and courtesy. I love
> squares. Not everyone does, but I often explain to people in my square,
> "squares are just like contras, only you have to listen."  And finally,
> callers, please stop telling people that when they reach the end of the
> line, "they're out."  This seems to encourgae dancers to think, "Well now,
> I don't have to pay attention." While they are on the floor they should
> "stay in the dance." That just may be me.  Thanks, George
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cary Ravitz
> caryravitz at gmail.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers at lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers at lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers at lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20150626/8e6acdb8/attachment.htm>