[Callers] Buzz Step Swing

Sun Jun 21 06:00:09 PDT 2015

Okay, so what about my first comment?:

Some people are not physically capable of a buzz step.

It can be too fast for any variety of physical limitations. If it could be
that some dancers simply can't get it easily. (Some dancers never "get" the
buzz step, and that's okay.)

The single most important thing to teach a dancer is "it's okay to make
mistakes". If we want to make our dances spaces where brand new dancers
feel comfortable, stating that all dancers need to learn the buzz step adds
an unwelcoming environmental factor.

I agree that a buzz step doesn't need to take long to teach, but I do it in
the context of teaching for beginners. I teach that the dosido works
spinning or not. That almost all moves can be done walking. That people
dancing lady role can refuse a flourish. (God forbid we teach lady role
dancers that they can initiate flourishes, but that's a different
discussion.) So teaching an optional swing method is contrary to these
other lessons. And I be sure, when I teach buzz step, to demonstrate that
one can buzz while the other walks.

Ron
On Jun 21, 2015 6:44 AM, "John Sweeney via Callers" <
callers at lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:

> Yes, of course I always tell dancers that they can walk instead of buzz,
> but
> the buzz-step is so much more fun that it seems crazy not to teach it when
> every dance is going to have a swing and usually two.
>
> <Digression:> Yes, I love swinging, and have been loving it for fifty years
> now, but why does every new dance have to have two swings?  Oh no, not
> Neighbour Balance & Swing, Circle Left 3/4, Partner Swing again - that's
> half the dance gone with nothing new or interesting in it! (And changing
> the
> Circle Left 3/4 to Men/Ladies Allemande 1 & 1/2 does not make it more
> interesting!)  I write lots of dances with one or zero swings - a
> zero-swing
> dance can have so much good stuff in it that the dancers don't even notice
> there is no swing; they are having too much fun. It always puzzles me when
> people take a great one-swing dance and re-choreograph it to add a second
> swing, losing part of what made it a great dance just for the sake of even
> more swinging. <End of digression.>
>
> I found it interesting that Ron said, "the buzz-step swing gets axed if I'm
> short on time".  If I only had time to teach one thing then the only thing
> I
> would teach would be the buzz-step swing, and how to finish it so you end
> up
> in the right place.  I can't think of anything else that newcomers can't
> learn during the walk-throughs.
>
> Question: If you were calling for a group with a dozen newcomers in the
> hall
> out of 100 people, and the organizers said you could have two minutes
> teaching before you started the first walk-through, what would you teach?
> For me the answer is obvious, every dance has a buzz-step swing; teach a
> buzz-step swing.
>
> Another reason for teaching swinging is that there are a significant number
> of "experienced" dancers who have bad swinging habits.  I dance all over
> the
> USA and the UK and wherever I go there are always some people who:
> - grip, clamp, squeeze, hang, press
> - hold their partner in the wrong place so it is uncomfortable
> - use too much strength and try to do silly things like making their
> partners feet leave the floor
> - lean sideways or backwards
> - start twirls too late and when they are facing the wrong way so that they
> end up in the wrong place
> - etc.
>
> If just a couple of those dancers pick up on any of these points and
> improve
> their swinging then you have done good work!
>
> Yes, I hate it when callers talk too much and take time out of dancing
> time.
> But this can be really short:
>
> Sample teach:
> = = = = = = = =
> Hi, I'm John.  We have some new people here today and they are going to
> spend half an hour swinging tonight, so please let's spend a minute or two
> on showing them how it's done.  And all you great dancers out there why not
> see if you can't make your swing even better for you and your partners.
>
> This is called a buzz-step swing.
>
> First, let go of you partner completely. Put your left toe just behind your
> right foot like this. Now walk fast on the spot. Now push with your left
> foor as though you were on a skateboard and turn clockwise by yourself on
> the spot. Relax your knees so you don't bounce up and down.  See how
> smoothly.you can turn with the minimum of effort.
>
> Now take your partner in a ballroom hold - the man's hand on the lady's
> shoulderblade - it is far more comfotable for the lady if you hold them up
> high.  Now relax - make sure you are not pressing on any part of your
> partner.
>
> And swing - it should be a gentle embrace where, as a single
> counterbalanced
> unit, you glide smoothly and effortlessly around. Smile at your partner and
> you won't get dizzy.
>
> Now think of your joined hands as an arrowhead and finish pointing at the
> other couple.
>
> If you are having trouble with the buzz-step then you can always just walk.
> = = = = = = = =
>
> I just timed that and it took less than 90 seconds. Surely that is worth
> doing!
>
> Yes, some of them won’t get it, but for those who do you have just greatly
> enhanced their enjoyment of the evening.
>
> Anyway, that's what I think. :-)
>
> Happy dancing,
> John
>
> John Sweeney, Dancer, England john at modernjive.com 01233 625 362
> http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers at lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/attachments/20150621/b55a8021/attachment.htm>